CVE-2004-1995

Exp

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in FuseTalk 2.0 allows remote attackers to create arbitrary accounts via a link to adduser.cfm.

Published: 2004-12-31 Last update: 2026-04-16 Assigner: [email protected] Source: [email protected]
NVD Status：Modified，CVE State: published
View at NVD, CVE.org, EUVD

CVE-2004-1995 is rated High Exploit Risk (73.3/100): CVSS Medium severity, with medium exploitation likelihood (EPSS 5.11%). 2 public exploit reference(s) are indexed (Exploit-DB). EPSS rose +1.03% over the last day, indicating growing attacker interest. Public exploits are available—assess exposure, apply mitigations, and prioritize patching.

Risk is dynamic; we continuously reassess and refresh what is shown on this page as upstream context changes.

Public exploit references (Exploit-DB) for CVE-2004-1995

EDB-ID Source Kind Published Link
24081 exploit_db edb 2004-05-05 Exploit-DB ↗
— nvd_ref exploit_tag Exploit-DB ↗

Exploit prediction scoring system (EPSS) score for CVE-2004-1995

EPSS lead: Daily EPSS estimates relative likelihood of exploitation; percentile ranks this CVE among scored vulnerabilities (higher = more severe relative rank).

# Date Old EPSS score New EPSS score Delta (New - Old)
1 2025-09-26 4.08% 5.11% +1.03%
2 2025-03-30 6.17% 4.08% -2.09%
3 2025-03-29 — 6.17% —

Full EPSS history (11 records total)

Common vulnerability scoring system (CVSS) metrics for CVE-2004-1995

CVSS metrics for this CVE.

Base score Version Severity Vector Exploitability Impact Score source
6.5 3.1 MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N Click to expand
Attack vector (AV:N)
Could be attacked over the internet or any normal routed network—not just someone sitting at the machine.
Attack complexity (AC:L)
Once they can reach the bug, pulling it off is straightforward—no weird race conditions or rare setup.
Privileges required (PR:N)
No account or special rights needed—anonymous or random user is enough.
User interaction (UI:R)
A real person has to do something—click, install, enable—otherwise it doesn’t land.
Scope (S:U)
Damage stays in the same “trust bubble” as the broken component—no big spill into unrelated systems.
Confidentiality (C:N)
Doesn’t really leak secrets in a meaningful way.
Integrity (I:H)
They could widely tamper with or forge data—trust in the data is badly hurt.
Availability (A:N)
Service keeps running; no real outage angle.
 2.8 3.6 [email protected]
7.5 2.0 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P Click to expand
Access vector (AV:N)
Can be exploited remotely over network reachability.
Access complexity (AC:L)
Exploitation conditions are straightforward and predictable.
Authentication (AU:N)
No authentication is required.
Confidentiality impact (C:P)
Partial confidentiality impact.
Integrity impact (I:P)
Partial integrity impact.
Availability impact (A:P)
Partial availability impact.
 10.0 6.4 [email protected]

Weakness enumeration for CVE-2004-1995

Affected software / configurations for CVE-2004-1995

Vendor Product Version Raw CPE
fusetalk fusetalk 2.0 cpe:2.3:a:fusetalk:fusetalk:2.0:-:*:*:*:*:*:*

References for CVE-2004-1995

URL Tags
http://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=108377423825478&w=2 Mailing List
http://secunia.com/advisories/11555 Broken Link Vendor Advisory
http://securitytracker.com/id?1010080 Broken Link Third Party Advisory VDB Entry
http://www.osvdb.org/5895 Broken Link
http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/10276 Broken Link Exploit Third Party Advisory VDB Entry Vendor Advisory
https://exchange.xforce.ibmcloud.com/vulnerabilities/16080 Third Party Advisory VDB Entry
cvelogic Threat Intelligence