Aggregating NVD, CVE, and multi-source threat feeds, this list provides deep analysis of high-risk threats such as RCE. By integrating CVSS and EPSS models, the system dynamically tracks Exp (Exploit) resources and PoC availability to accurately assess Exploitability. Combined with official Patches and remediation strategies, it helps prioritize Vulnerability Management workflows, significantly shortening response cycles and securing your critical assets.
Assigner (CNA / source)：[email protected] Remove this filter
| CVE | Description | Max CVSS | EPSS % | Published | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2018-7340 | Duo Network Gateway 1.2.9 and earlier may incorrectly utilize the results of XML DOM traversal and canonicalization APIs in such a way that an attacker may be able to manipulate the SAML data without invalidating the cryptographic signature, allowing the attack to potentially bypass authentication to SAML service providers. | 7.5 | 0.10% | 2019-04-17 | 2024-11-21 |
| CVE-2017-11430 | OmniAuth OmnitAuth-SAML 1.9.0 and earlier may incorrectly utilize the results of XML DOM traversal and canonicalization APIs in such a way that an attacker may be able to manipulate the SAML data without invalidating the cryptographic signature, allowing the attack to potentially bypass authentication to SAML service providers. | 7.7 | 0.44% | 2019-04-17 | 2024-11-21 |
| CVE-2017-11429 | Clever saml2-js 2.0 and earlier may incorrectly utilize the results of XML DOM traversal and canonicalization APIs in such a way that an attacker may be able to manipulate the SAML data without invalidating the cryptographic signature, allowing the attack to potentially bypass authentication to SAML service providers. | 7.7 | 0.39% | 2019-04-17 | 2024-11-21 |
| CVE-2017-11428 | OneLogin Ruby-SAML 1.6.0 and earlier may incorrectly utilize the results of XML DOM traversal and canonicalization APIs in such a way that an attacker may be able to manipulate the SAML data without invalidating the cryptographic signature, allowing the attack to potentially bypass authentication to SAML service providers. | 7.7 | 0.37% | 2019-04-17 | 2024-11-21 |
| CVE-2017-11427 | OneLogin PythonSAML 2.3.0 and earlier may incorrectly utilize the results of XML DOM traversal and canonicalization APIs in such a way that an attacker may be able to manipulate the SAML data without invalidating the cryptographic signature, allowing the attack to potentially bypass authentication to SAML service providers. | 7.7 | 3.43% | 2019-04-17 | 2024-11-21 |
| CVE-2017-11424 | In PyJWT 1.5.0 and below the `invalid_strings` check in `HMACAlgorithm.prepare_key` does not account for all PEM encoded public keys. Specifically, the PKCS1 PEM encoded format would be allowed because it is prefaced with the string `-----BEGIN RSA PUBLIC KEY-----` which is not accounted for. This enables symmetric/asymmetric key confusion attacks against users using the PKCS1 PEM encoded public keys, which would allow an attacker to craft JWTs from scratch. | 7.5 | 0.19% | 2017-08-24 | 2026-05-13 |