Aggregating NVD, CVE, and multi-source threat feeds, this list provides deep analysis of high-risk threats such as RCE. By integrating CVSS and EPSS models, the system dynamically tracks Exp (Exploit) resources and PoC availability to accurately assess Exploitability. Combined with official Patches and remediation strategies, it helps prioritize Vulnerability Management workflows, significantly shortening response cycles and securing your critical assets.
Assigner (CNA / source)：[email protected] Remove this filter
| CVE | Description | Max CVSS | EPSS % | Published | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-25701 | The fUSBHub driver in the PCoIP Software Client prior to version 21.07.0 had an error in object management during the handling of a variety of IOCTLs, which allowed an attacker to cause a denial of service. | 5.5 | 0.22% | 2021-07-21 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2021-25699 | The OpenSSL component of the Teradici PCoIP Software Client prior to version 21.07.0 was compiled without the no-autoload-config option, which allowed an attacker to elevate to the privileges of the running process via placing a specially crafted dll in a build configuration directory. | 7.8 | 0.41% | 2021-07-21 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2021-25698 | The OpenSSL component of the Teradici PCoIP Standard Agent prior to version 21.07.0 was compiled without the no-autoload-config option, which allowed an attacker to elevate to the privileges of the running process via placing a specially crafted dll in a build configuration directory. | 7.8 | 0.41% | 2021-07-21 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2021-25695 | The USB vHub in the Teradici PCOIP Software Agent prior to version 21.07.0 would accept commands from any program, which may allow an attacker to elevate privileges by changing the flow of program execution within the vHub driver. | 7.8 | 0.28% | 2021-07-21 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2021-25693 | An attacker may cause a Denial of Service (DoS) in multiple versions of Teradici PCoIP Agent via a null pointer dereference. | 7.5 | 0.96% | 2021-05-13 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2021-25694 | Teradici PCoIP Graphics Agent for Windows prior to 21.03 does not validate NVENC.dll. An attacker could replace the .dll and redirect pixels elsewhere. | 7.8 | 0.26% | 2021-05-13 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2021-25692 | Sensitive smart card data is logged in default INFO logs by Teradici's PCoIP Connection Manager and Security Gateway prior to version 21.01.3. | 4.6 | 0.18% | 2021-04-06 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2021-25690 | A null pointer dereference in Teradici PCoIP Soft Client versions prior to 20.07.3 could allow an attacker to crash the software. | 7.5 | 0.97% | 2021-02-11 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2021-25689 | An out of bounds write in Teradici PCoIP soft client versions prior to version 20.10.1 could allow an attacker to remotely execute code. | 9.8 | 1.50% | 2021-02-11 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2021-25688 | Under certain conditions, Teradici PCoIP Agents for Windows prior to version 20.10.0 and Teradici PCoIP Agents for Linux prior to version 21.01.0 may log parts of a user's password in the application logs. | 5.5 | 0.24% | 2021-02-11 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2020-13186 | An Anti CSRF mechanism was discovered missing in the Teradici Cloud Access Connector v31 and earlier in a specific web form, which allowed an attacker with knowledge of both a machineID and user GUID to modify data if a user clicked a malicious link. | 6.5 | 0.34% | 2021-02-11 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2020-13185 | Certain web application pages in the authenticated section of the Teradici Cloud Access Connector prior to v18 were accessible without the need to specify authentication tokens, which allowed an attacker in the ability to execute sensitive functions without credentials. | 6.5 | 0.97% | 2021-02-11 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2020-13222 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none | N/A | 0.24% | 2021-01-26 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2020-13221 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none | N/A | 0.24% | 2021-01-26 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2020-13220 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none | N/A | 0.24% | 2021-01-26 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2020-13219 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none | N/A | 0.24% | 2021-01-26 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2020-13218 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none | N/A | 0.24% | 2021-01-26 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2020-13217 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none | N/A | 0.24% | 2021-01-26 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2020-13216 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none | N/A | 0.24% | 2021-01-26 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2020-13215 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2020. Notes: none | N/A | 0.24% | 2021-01-26 | 2023-11-06 |