CVE-2009-2911

Exp

SystemTap 1.0, when the --unprivileged option is used, does not properly restrict certain data sizes, which allows local users to (1) cause a denial of service or gain privileges via a print operation with a large number of arguments that trigger a kernel stack overflow, (2) cause a denial of service via crafted DWARF expressions that trigger a kernel stack frame overflow, or (3) cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via vectors that trigger creation of large unwind tables, related to Common Information Entry (CIE) and Call Frame Instruction (CFI) records.

Published: 2009-10-22 Last update: 2026-04-23 Assigner: [email protected] Source: [email protected]

Conclusion & alert: CVE-2009-2911 is rated Exploit Available (50/100): CVSS Low severity, with low exploitation likelihood (EPSS 0.08%). Core evidence: 1 public exploit reference(s) are indexed (Exploit-DB). Mandatory action: Public exploits are available—assess exposure, apply mitigations, and prioritize patching.

Risk is dynamic; we continuously reassess and refresh what is shown on this page as upstream context changes.

Public exploit references (Exploit-DB) for CVE-2009-2911

EDB-ID Source Kind Published Link
nvd_ref exploit_tag Exploit-DB ↗

Exploit prediction scoring system (EPSS) score for CVE-2009-2911

EPSS lead: Daily EPSS estimates relative likelihood of exploitation; percentile ranks this CVE among scored vulnerabilities (higher = more severe relative rank).

# Date Old EPSS score New EPSS score Delta (New - Old)
1 2025-03-17 0.04% 0.08% +0.04%
2 2023-03-07 1.28% 0.04% -1.24%
3 2022-02-04 1.28%

Full EPSS history (3 records total)

Common vulnerability scoring system (CVSS) metrics for CVE-2009-2911

CVSS metrics for this CVE.

Base score Version Severity Vector Exploitability Impact Score source
1.9 2.0 LOW
AV:L/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P Click to expand
Access vector (AV:L)
Requires local access to the target system.
Access complexity (AC:M)
Exploitation needs some favorable conditions, but not exceptional ones.
Authentication (AU:N)
No authentication is required.
Confidentiality impact (C:N)
No confidentiality impact.
Integrity impact (I:N)
No integrity impact.
Availability impact (A:P)
Partial availability impact.
3.4 2.9 [email protected]

Weakness enumeration for CVE-2009-2911

OS Trackers for CVE-2009-2911

vendor priority summary link
debian not yet assigned CVE-2009-2911 not yet assigned priority: Debian including 1 source packages (systemtap), 5 status rows across 5 suites (bookworm, bullseye, forky, sid, trixie): resolved 5. https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2009-2911
redhat low https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2009-2911
suse low CVE-2009-2911 severity low: SUSE including 47 source package names (systemtap-1.0-0.15.16, systemtap-1.5-0.7.54, …), 58 product×package rows across 23 product lines (SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 12 SP5, SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Development Tools 15, … (23 product lines)): Fixed 58. https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2009-2911/
ubuntu low CVE-2009-2911 low priority: Ubuntu including 1 source packages (systemtap), 10 status rows across 10 suites (dapper, hardy, intrepid, jaunty, karmic, lucid, maverick, natty, oneiric, upstream): ignored 4, not-affected 4, DNE 1, released 1. https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2009-2911

Affected software / configurations for CVE-2009-2911

Vendor Product Version Raw CPE
systemtap systemtap 1.0 cpe:2.3:a:systemtap:systemtap:1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

References for CVE-2009-2911

cvelogic Threat Intelligence