CVE-2012-4568

Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in LetoDMS (formerly MyDMS) before 3.3.8 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors.

Published: 2017-10-23 Last update: 2026-05-13 Assigner: [email protected] Source: [email protected]
NVD Status：Modified，CVE State: published
View at NVD, CVE.org, EUVD

CVE-2012-4568 is rated Moderate Risk (47.7/100): CVSS High severity, with low exploitation likelihood (EPSS 0.15%). Review affected assets and schedule remediation.

Risk is dynamic; we continuously reassess and refresh what is shown on this page as upstream context changes.

Exploit prediction scoring system (EPSS) score for CVE-2012-4568

EPSS lead: Daily EPSS estimates relative likelihood of exploitation; percentile ranks this CVE among scored vulnerabilities (higher = more severe relative rank).

# Date Old EPSS score New EPSS score Delta (New - Old)
1 2025-08-21 0.20% 0.15% -0.05%
2 2025-07-15 0.27% 0.20% -0.07%
3 2025-03-30 — 0.27% —

Full EPSS history (7 records total)

Common vulnerability scoring system (CVSS) metrics for CVE-2012-4568

CVSS metrics for this CVE.

Base score Version Severity Vector Exploitability Impact Score source
8.8 3.0 HIGH
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H Click to expand
Attack vector (AV:N)
Could be attacked over the internet or any normal routed network—not just someone sitting at the machine.
Attack complexity (AC:L)
Once they can reach the bug, pulling it off is straightforward—no weird race conditions or rare setup.
Privileges required (PR:N)
No account or special rights needed—anonymous or random user is enough.
User interaction (UI:R)
A real person has to do something—click, install, enable—otherwise it doesn’t land.
Scope (S:U)
Damage stays in the same “trust bubble” as the broken component—no big spill into unrelated systems.
Confidentiality (C:H)
Serious risk that confidential data gets exposed in a big way.
Integrity (I:H)
They could widely tamper with or forge data—trust in the data is badly hurt.
Availability (A:H)
Could take the service down hard or make it unusable for people who depend on it.
 2.8 5.9 [email protected]
6.8 2.0 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P Click to expand
Access vector (AV:N)
Can be exploited remotely over network reachability.
Access complexity (AC:M)
Exploitation needs some favorable conditions, but not exceptional ones.
Authentication (AU:N)
No authentication is required.
Confidentiality impact (C:P)
Partial confidentiality impact.
Integrity impact (I:P)
Partial integrity impact.
Availability impact (A:P)
Partial availability impact.
 8.6 6.4 [email protected]

Weakness enumeration for CVE-2012-4568

OS Trackers for CVE-2012-4568

vendor priority summary link
ubuntu medium CVE-2012-4568 medium priority: Ubuntu including 1 source packages (letodms), 15 status rows across 15 suites (hardy, lucid, oneiric, precise, quantal, raring, saucy, trusty, upstream, utopic, vivid, wily, xenial, yakkety, zesty): not-affected 8, DNE 3, ignored 3, released 1. https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2012-4568

Affected software / configurations for CVE-2012-4568

Vendor Product Version Raw CPE
letodms_project letodms <= 3.3.7 cpe:2.3:a:letodms_project:letodms:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

References for CVE-2012-4568

URL Tags
http://sourceforge.net/p/mydms/code/HEAD/tree/trunk/CHANGELOG Release Notes Third Party Advisory
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/10/06/1 Mailing List Third Party Advisory VDB Entry
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2012/10/31/7 Mailing List Third Party Advisory VDB Entry
cvelogic Threat Intelligence