CVE-2016-1373

The gadgets-integration API in Cisco Finesse 8.5(1) through 8.5(5), 8.6(1), 9.0(1), 9.0(2), 9.1(1), 9.1(1)SU1, 9.1(1)SU1.1, 9.1(1)ES1 through 9.1(1)ES5, 10.0(1), 10.0(1)SU1, 10.0(1)SU1.1, 10.5(1), 10.5(1)ES1 through 10.5(1)ES4, 10.5(1)SU1, 10.5(1)SU1.1, 10.5(1)SU1.7, 10.6(1), 10.6(1)SU1, 10.6(1)SU2, and 11.0(1) allows remote attackers to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks via a crafted request, aka Bug ID CSCuw86623.

Published: 2016-05-05 Last update: 2026-06-16 Assigner: [email protected] Source: [email protected]
NVD Status：Modified，CVE State: published
View at NVD, CVE.org, EUVD

CVE-2016-1373 is rated Moderate Risk (56.2/100): CVSS High severity, with medium exploitation likelihood (EPSS 1.06%). Review affected assets and schedule remediation.

Risk is dynamic; we continuously reassess and refresh what is shown on this page as upstream context changes.

Exploit prediction scoring system (EPSS) score for CVE-2016-1373

EPSS lead: Daily EPSS estimates relative likelihood of exploitation; percentile ranks this CVE among scored vulnerabilities (higher = more severe relative rank).

# Date Old EPSS score New EPSS score Delta (New - Old)
1 2026-06-15 0.24% 1.06% +0.83%
2 2025-03-30 0.37% 0.24% -0.13%
3 2025-03-29 — 0.37% —

Full EPSS history (5 records total)

Common vulnerability scoring system (CVSS) metrics for CVE-2016-1373

CVSS metrics for this CVE.

Base score Version Severity Vector Exploitability Impact Score source
8.6 3.0 HIGH
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N Click to expand
Attack vector (AV:N)
Could be attacked over the internet or any normal routed network—not just someone sitting at the machine.
Attack complexity (AC:L)
Once they can reach the bug, pulling it off is straightforward—no weird race conditions or rare setup.
Privileges required (PR:N)
No account or special rights needed—anonymous or random user is enough.
User interaction (UI:N)
Nobody has to click “OK” or open a trap file; it can work without a victim helping.
Scope (S:C)
Breaking this can reach past the original component and bite other resources—bigger blast radius.
Confidentiality (C:N)
Doesn’t really leak secrets in a meaningful way.
Integrity (I:H)
They could widely tamper with or forge data—trust in the data is badly hurt.
Availability (A:N)
Service keeps running; no real outage angle.
 3.9 4.0 [email protected]
5.0 2.0 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N Click to expand
Access vector (AV:N)
Can be exploited remotely over network reachability.
Access complexity (AC:L)
Exploitation conditions are straightforward and predictable.
Authentication (AU:N)
No authentication is required.
Confidentiality impact (C:N)
No confidentiality impact.
Integrity impact (I:P)
Partial integrity impact.
Availability impact (A:N)
No availability impact.
 10.0 2.9 [email protected]

Weakness enumeration for CVE-2016-1373

NVD evaluator notes for CVE-2016-1373

Comment: <a href="https://cwe.mitre.org/data/definitions/918.html">CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)</a>

Affected software / configurations for CVE-2016-1373

Vendor Product Version Raw CPE
cisco finesse 8.5\(1\)_base cpe:2.3:a:cisco:finesse:8.5\(1\)_base:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco finesse 8.5\(2\)_base cpe:2.3:a:cisco:finesse:8.5\(2\)_base:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco finesse 8.5\(3\)_base cpe:2.3:a:cisco:finesse:8.5\(3\)_base:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco finesse 8.5\(4\)_base cpe:2.3:a:cisco:finesse:8.5\(4\)_base:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco finesse 8.5\(5\)_base cpe:2.3:a:cisco:finesse:8.5\(5\)_base:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco finesse 8.6\(1\)_base cpe:2.3:a:cisco:finesse:8.6\(1\)_base:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco finesse 9.0\(1\)_base cpe:2.3:a:cisco:finesse:9.0\(1\)_base:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco finesse 9.0\(2\)_base cpe:2.3:a:cisco:finesse:9.0\(2\)_base:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco finesse 9.1\(1\)_base cpe:2.3:a:cisco:finesse:9.1\(1\)_base:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco finesse 9.1\(1\)_es1 cpe:2.3:a:cisco:finesse:9.1\(1\)_es1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco finesse 9.1\(1\)_es2 cpe:2.3:a:cisco:finesse:9.1\(1\)_es2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco finesse 9.1\(1\)_es3 cpe:2.3:a:cisco:finesse:9.1\(1\)_es3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco finesse 9.1\(1\)_es4 cpe:2.3:a:cisco:finesse:9.1\(1\)_es4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco finesse 9.1\(1\)_es5 cpe:2.3:a:cisco:finesse:9.1\(1\)_es5:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco finesse 9.1\(1\)_su1 cpe:2.3:a:cisco:finesse:9.1\(1\)_su1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco finesse 9.1\(1\)_su1.1 cpe:2.3:a:cisco:finesse:9.1\(1\)_su1.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco finesse 10.0\(1\)_base cpe:2.3:a:cisco:finesse:10.0\(1\)_base:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco finesse 10.0\(1\)_su1 cpe:2.3:a:cisco:finesse:10.0\(1\)_su1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco finesse 10.0\(1\)_su1.1 cpe:2.3:a:cisco:finesse:10.0\(1\)_su1.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco finesse 10.5\(1\)_base cpe:2.3:a:cisco:finesse:10.5\(1\)_base:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco finesse 10.5\(1\)_es1 cpe:2.3:a:cisco:finesse:10.5\(1\)_es1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco finesse 10.5\(1\)_es2 cpe:2.3:a:cisco:finesse:10.5\(1\)_es2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco finesse 10.5\(1\)_es3 cpe:2.3:a:cisco:finesse:10.5\(1\)_es3:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco finesse 10.5\(1\)_es4 cpe:2.3:a:cisco:finesse:10.5\(1\)_es4:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco finesse 10.5\(1\)_su1 cpe:2.3:a:cisco:finesse:10.5\(1\)_su1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco finesse 10.5\(1\)_su1.1 cpe:2.3:a:cisco:finesse:10.5\(1\)_su1.1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco finesse 10.5\(1\)_su1.7 cpe:2.3:a:cisco:finesse:10.5\(1\)_su1.7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco finesse 10.6\(1\)_base cpe:2.3:a:cisco:finesse:10.6\(1\)_base:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco finesse 10.6\(1\)_su1 cpe:2.3:a:cisco:finesse:10.6\(1\)_su1:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco finesse 10.6\(1\)_su2 cpe:2.3:a:cisco:finesse:10.6\(1\)_su2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco finesse 11.0\(1\)_base cpe:2.3:a:cisco:finesse:11.0\(1\)_base:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

References for CVE-2016-1373

cvelogic Threat Intelligence