CVE-2019-12700 | Cisco FTD, FMC, and FXOS Software Pluggable Authentication Module Denial of Service Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the configuration of the Pluggable Authentication Module (PAM) used in Cisco Firepower Threat Defense (FTD) Software, Cisco Firepower Management Center (FMC) Software, and Cisco FXOS Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to cause a denial of service (DoS) condition. The vulnerability is due to improper resource management in the context of user session management. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by connecting to an affected system and performing many simultaneous successful Secure Shell (SSH) logins. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to exhaust system resources and cause the device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker needs valid user credentials on the system.

Published: 2019-10-02 Last update: 2026-06-16 Assigner: [email protected] Source: [email protected]

Conclusion & alert: CVE-2019-12700 is rated Moderate Risk (53.4/100): CVSS Medium severity, with medium exploitation likelihood (EPSS 1.88%). Mandatory action: Review affected assets and schedule remediation.

Risk is dynamic; we continuously reassess and refresh what is shown on this page as upstream context changes.

Exploit prediction scoring system (EPSS) score for CVE-2019-12700

EPSS lead: Daily EPSS estimates relative likelihood of exploitation; percentile ranks this CVE among scored vulnerabilities (higher = more severe relative rank).

# Date Old EPSS score New EPSS score Delta (New - Old)
1 2026-06-15 1.35% 1.88% +0.53%
2 2026-01-06 1.42% 1.35% -0.07%
3 2025-03-30 1.42%

Full EPSS history (10 records total)

Common vulnerability scoring system (CVSS) metrics for CVE-2019-12700

CVSS metrics for this CVE.

Base score Version Severity Vector Exploitability Impact Score source
6.5 3.1 MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H Click to expand
Attack vector (AV:N)
Could be attacked over the internet or any normal routed network—not just someone sitting at the machine.
Attack complexity (AC:L)
Once they can reach the bug, pulling it off is straightforward—no weird race conditions or rare setup.
Privileges required (PR:L)
A normal user session is enough; they don’t have to be admin.
User interaction (UI:N)
Nobody has to click “OK” or open a trap file; it can work without a victim helping.
Scope (S:U)
Damage stays in the same “trust bubble” as the broken component—no big spill into unrelated systems.
Confidentiality (C:N)
Doesn’t really leak secrets in a meaningful way.
Integrity (I:N)
Data isn’t meaningfully altered or forged.
Availability (A:H)
Could take the service down hard or make it unusable for people who depend on it.
2.8 3.6 [email protected]
7.7 3.0 HIGH
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H Click to expand
Attack vector (AV:N)
Could be attacked over the internet or any normal routed network—not just someone sitting at the machine.
Attack complexity (AC:L)
Once they can reach the bug, pulling it off is straightforward—no weird race conditions or rare setup.
Privileges required (PR:L)
A normal user session is enough; they don’t have to be admin.
User interaction (UI:N)
Nobody has to click “OK” or open a trap file; it can work without a victim helping.
Scope (S:C)
Breaking this can reach past the original component and bite other resources—bigger blast radius.
Confidentiality (C:N)
Doesn’t really leak secrets in a meaningful way.
Integrity (I:N)
Data isn’t meaningfully altered or forged.
Availability (A:H)
Could take the service down hard or make it unusable for people who depend on it.
3.1 4.0 [email protected]
6.8 2.0 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:N/A:C Click to expand
Access vector (AV:N)
Can be exploited remotely over network reachability.
Access complexity (AC:L)
Exploitation conditions are straightforward and predictable.
Authentication (AU:S)
A single authentication is required.
Confidentiality impact (C:N)
No confidentiality impact.
Integrity impact (I:N)
No integrity impact.
Availability impact (A:C)
Complete availability impact.
8.0 6.9 [email protected]

Weakness enumeration for CVE-2019-12700

Affected software / configurations for CVE-2019-12700

Vendor Product Version Raw CPE
cisco firepower_9300_firmware r114 cpe:2.3:o:cisco:firepower_9300_firmware:r114:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco firepower_9300_firmware r241 cpe:2.3:o:cisco:firepower_9300_firmware:r241:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco firepower_extensible_operating_system <= 2.2 cpe:2.3:o:cisco:firepower_extensible_operating_system:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco firepower_extensible_operating_system >= 2.3, < 2.3.1.155 cpe:2.3:o:cisco:firepower_extensible_operating_system:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco firepower_extensible_operating_system >= 2.4, < 2.6.1.131 cpe:2.3:o:cisco:firepower_extensible_operating_system:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco firepower_threat_defense <= 6.1.0 cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco firepower_threat_defense >= 6.2.0, < 6.2.3.14 cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco secure_firewall_management_center <= 6.1.0 cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_firewall_management_center:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco secure_firewall_management_center >= 6.2.0, < 6.2.3.14 cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_firewall_management_center:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco firepower_threat_defense >= 6.2.0, < 6.2.2.5 cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco firepower_threat_defense >= 6.2.3, < 6.2.3.7 cpe:2.3:a:cisco:firepower_threat_defense:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco secure_firewall_management_center >= 6.2.3, < 6.2.3.7 cpe:2.3:a:cisco:secure_firewall_management_center:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

References for CVE-2019-12700

cvelogic Threat Intelligence