CVE-2019-1665 | Cisco Hyperflex Stored Cross-Site Scripting Vulnerability

A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco HyperFlex software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site scripting (XSS) attack against a user of the web-based management interface of an affected system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input by the web-based management interface of an affected system. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by persuading a user of the interface to click a maliciously crafted link. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary script code in the context of the affected interface or access sensitive, browser-based information. Versions prior to 3.5(1a) are affected.

Published: 2019-02-21 Last update: 2024-11-21 Assigner: [email protected] Source: [email protected]
NVD Status：Modified，CVE State: published
View at NVD, CVE.org, EUVD

CVE-2019-1665 is rated Low Risk (30.3/100): CVSS Medium severity, with low exploitation likelihood (EPSS 0.12%). Monitor for updates and reassess as exploit intelligence or EPSS changes.

Risk is dynamic; we continuously reassess and refresh what is shown on this page as upstream context changes.

Exploit prediction scoring system (EPSS) score for CVE-2019-1665

EPSS lead: Daily EPSS estimates relative likelihood of exploitation; percentile ranks this CVE among scored vulnerabilities (higher = more severe relative rank).

# Date Old EPSS score New EPSS score Delta (New - Old)
1 2025-05-28 0.16% 0.12% -0.03%
2 2025-03-19 0.13% 0.16% +0.03%
3 2024-07-13 — 0.13% —

Full EPSS history (8 records total)

Common vulnerability scoring system (CVSS) metrics for CVE-2019-1665

CVSS metrics for this CVE.

Base score Version Severity Vector Exploitability Impact Score source
4.7 3.0 MEDIUM
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N Click to expand
Attack vector (AV:N)
Could be attacked over the internet or any normal routed network—not just someone sitting at the machine.
Attack complexity (AC:H)
Even with access, the exploit needs extra luck, timing, or a fussy environment to actually work.
Privileges required (PR:N)
No account or special rights needed—anonymous or random user is enough.
User interaction (UI:R)
A real person has to do something—click, install, enable—otherwise it doesn’t land.
Scope (S:C)
Breaking this can reach past the original component and bite other resources—bigger blast radius.
Confidentiality (C:L)
Some sensitive info could get out, but not a total data dump.
Integrity (I:L)
Attackers could change some data, but it’s limited—not everything goes.
Availability (A:N)
Service keeps running; no real outage angle.
 1.6 2.7 [email protected]
6.1 3.0 MEDIUM
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N Click to expand
Attack vector (AV:N)
Could be attacked over the internet or any normal routed network—not just someone sitting at the machine.
Attack complexity (AC:L)
Once they can reach the bug, pulling it off is straightforward—no weird race conditions or rare setup.
Privileges required (PR:N)
No account or special rights needed—anonymous or random user is enough.
User interaction (UI:R)
A real person has to do something—click, install, enable—otherwise it doesn’t land.
Scope (S:C)
Breaking this can reach past the original component and bite other resources—bigger blast radius.
Confidentiality (C:L)
Some sensitive info could get out, but not a total data dump.
Integrity (I:L)
Attackers could change some data, but it’s limited—not everything goes.
Availability (A:N)
Service keeps running; no real outage angle.
 2.8 2.7 [email protected]
4.3 2.0 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N Click to expand
Access vector (AV:N)
Can be exploited remotely over network reachability.
Access complexity (AC:M)
Exploitation needs some favorable conditions, but not exceptional ones.
Authentication (AU:N)
No authentication is required.
Confidentiality impact (C:N)
No confidentiality impact.
Integrity impact (I:P)
Partial integrity impact.
Availability impact (A:N)
No availability impact.
 8.6 2.9 [email protected]

Weakness enumeration for CVE-2019-1665

Affected software / configurations for CVE-2019-1665

Vendor Product Version Raw CPE
cisco hyperflex_hx_data_platform 2.6\(1a\) cpe:2.3:o:cisco:hyperflex_hx_data_platform:2.6\(1a\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco hyperflex_hx_data_platform 2.6\(1b\) cpe:2.3:o:cisco:hyperflex_hx_data_platform:2.6\(1b\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco hyperflex_hx_data_platform 2.6\(1d\) cpe:2.3:o:cisco:hyperflex_hx_data_platform:2.6\(1d\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco hyperflex_hx_data_platform 2.6\(1e\) cpe:2.3:o:cisco:hyperflex_hx_data_platform:2.6\(1e\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco hyperflex_hx_data_platform 3.0\(1a\) cpe:2.3:o:cisco:hyperflex_hx_data_platform:3.0\(1a\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco hyperflex_hx_data_platform 3.0\(1b\) cpe:2.3:o:cisco:hyperflex_hx_data_platform:3.0\(1b\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco hyperflex_hx_data_platform 3.0\(1c\) cpe:2.3:o:cisco:hyperflex_hx_data_platform:3.0\(1c\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco hyperflex_hx_data_platform 3.0\(1d\) cpe:2.3:o:cisco:hyperflex_hx_data_platform:3.0\(1d\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco hyperflex_hx_data_platform 3.0\(1e\) cpe:2.3:o:cisco:hyperflex_hx_data_platform:3.0\(1e\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco hyperflex_hx_data_platform 3.0\(1h\) cpe:2.3:o:cisco:hyperflex_hx_data_platform:3.0\(1h\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cisco hyperflex_hx_data_platform 3.0\(1i\) cpe:2.3:o:cisco:hyperflex_hx_data_platform:3.0\(1i\):*:*:*:*:*:*:*

References for CVE-2019-1665

cvelogic Threat Intelligence