CVE-2021-41136 | Inconsistent Interpretation of HTTP Requests ('HTTP Request Smuggling') in puma

Puma is a HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby/Rack applications. Prior to versions 5.5.1 and 4.3.9, using `puma` with a proxy which forwards HTTP header values which contain the LF character could allow HTTP request smugggling. A client could smuggle a request through a proxy, causing the proxy to send a response back to another unknown client. The only proxy which has this behavior, as far as the Puma team is aware of, is Apache Traffic Server. If the proxy uses persistent connections and the client adds another request in via HTTP pipelining, the proxy may mistake it as the first request's body. Puma, however, would see it as two requests, and when processing the second request, send back a response that the proxy does not expect. If the proxy has reused the persistent connection to Puma to send another request for a different client, the second response from the first client will be sent to the second client. This vulnerability was patched in Puma 5.5.1 and 4.3.9. As a workaround, do not use Apache Traffic Server with `puma`.

Published: 2021-10-12 Last update: 2025-05-27 Assigner: [email protected] Source: [email protected]

Conclusion & alert: CVE-2021-41136 is rated Low Risk (32.6/100): CVSS Low severity, with medium exploitation likelihood (EPSS 0.29%). Mandatory action: Monitor for updates and reassess as exploit intelligence or EPSS changes.

Risk is dynamic; we continuously reassess and refresh what is shown on this page as upstream context changes.

Exploit prediction scoring system (EPSS) score for CVE-2021-41136

EPSS lead: Daily EPSS estimates relative likelihood of exploitation; percentile ranks this CVE among scored vulnerabilities (higher = more severe relative rank).

# Date Old EPSS score New EPSS score Delta (New - Old)
1 2025-11-21 0.68% 0.29% -0.39%
2 2025-11-18 0.27% 0.68% +0.41%
3 2025-09-12 0.27%

Full EPSS history (15 records total)

Common vulnerability scoring system (CVSS) metrics for CVE-2021-41136

CVSS metrics for this CVE.

Base score Version Severity Vector Exploitability Impact Score source
3.7 3.1 LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N Click to expand
Attack vector (AV:N)
Could be attacked over the internet or any normal routed network—not just someone sitting at the machine.
Attack complexity (AC:H)
Even with access, the exploit needs extra luck, timing, or a fussy environment to actually work.
Privileges required (PR:L)
A normal user session is enough; they don’t have to be admin.
User interaction (UI:R)
A real person has to do something—click, install, enable—otherwise it doesn’t land.
Scope (S:U)
Damage stays in the same “trust bubble” as the broken component—no big spill into unrelated systems.
Confidentiality (C:L)
Some sensitive info could get out, but not a total data dump.
Integrity (I:L)
Attackers could change some data, but it’s limited—not everything goes.
Availability (A:N)
Service keeps running; no real outage angle.
1.2 2.5 [email protected]
3.7 3.1 LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N Click to expand
Attack vector (AV:N)
Could be attacked over the internet or any normal routed network—not just someone sitting at the machine.
Attack complexity (AC:H)
Even with access, the exploit needs extra luck, timing, or a fussy environment to actually work.
Privileges required (PR:L)
A normal user session is enough; they don’t have to be admin.
User interaction (UI:R)
A real person has to do something—click, install, enable—otherwise it doesn’t land.
Scope (S:U)
Damage stays in the same “trust bubble” as the broken component—no big spill into unrelated systems.
Confidentiality (C:L)
Some sensitive info could get out, but not a total data dump.
Integrity (I:L)
Attackers could change some data, but it’s limited—not everything goes.
Availability (A:N)
Service keeps running; no real outage angle.
1.2 2.5 [email protected]
3.6 2.0 LOW
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:N Click to expand
Access vector (AV:N)
Can be exploited remotely over network reachability.
Access complexity (AC:H)
Exploitation requires uncommon or highly specific conditions.
Authentication (AU:S)
A single authentication is required.
Confidentiality impact (C:P)
Partial confidentiality impact.
Integrity impact (I:P)
Partial integrity impact.
Availability impact (A:N)
No availability impact.
3.9 4.9 [email protected]

Weakness enumeration for CVE-2021-41136

GitHub Security Advisory for CVE-2021-41136

GHSA-48w2-rm65-62xx · Severity: low · Ecosystem: rubygems — Puma with proxy which forwards LF characters as line endings could allow HTTP request smuggling

OS Trackers for CVE-2021-41136

vendor priority summary link
debian not yet assigned CVE-2021-41136 not yet assigned priority: Debian including 1 source packages (puma), 5 status rows across 5 suites (bookworm, bullseye, forky, sid, trixie): resolved 5. https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-41136
gentoo low CVE-2021-41136: 1 GLSA(s) (202208-28), 1 atom(s) (www-servers/puma); latest impact low. https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=CVE-2021-41136
redhat low https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-41136
suse low https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-41136/
ubuntu medium CVE-2021-41136 medium priority: Ubuntu including 1 source packages (puma), 8 status rows across 8 suites (focal, hirsute, impish, jammy, kinetic, trusty, upstream, xenial): ignored 4, not-affected 3, needs-triage 1. https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2021-41136

Affected software / configurations for CVE-2021-41136

Vendor Product Version Raw CPE
puma puma <= 4.3.8 cpe:2.3:a:puma:puma:*:*:*:*:*:ruby:*:*
puma puma >= 5.0.0, <= 5.5.0 cpe:2.3:a:puma:puma:*:*:*:*:*:ruby:*:*
debian debian_linux 10.0 cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:10.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
debian debian_linux 11.0 cpe:2.3:o:debian:debian_linux:11.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

References for CVE-2021-41136

cvelogic Threat Intelligence