CVE-2022-3274 | Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) on user's settings in GitHub repository ikus060/rdiffweb prior to 2.4.6. in ikus060/rdiffweb

Exp

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository ikus060/rdiffweb prior to 2.4.7.

Published: 2022-09-22 Last update: 2026-06-17 Assigner: [email protected] Source: [email protected]
NVD Status：Modified，CVE State: published
View at NVD, CVE.org, EUVD

CVE-2022-3274 is rated Exploit Available (50/100): CVSS Low severity, with low exploitation likelihood (EPSS 0.36%). 1 public exploit reference(s) are indexed (Exploit-DB). Public exploits are available—assess exposure, apply mitigations, and prioritize patching.

Risk is dynamic; we continuously reassess and refresh what is shown on this page as upstream context changes.

Public exploit references (Exploit-DB) for CVE-2022-3274

EDB-ID Source Kind Published Link
— nvd_ref exploit_tag Exploit-DB ↗

Exploit prediction scoring system (EPSS) score for CVE-2022-3274

EPSS lead: Daily EPSS estimates relative likelihood of exploitation; percentile ranks this CVE among scored vulnerabilities (higher = more severe relative rank).

# Date Old EPSS score New EPSS score Delta (New - Old)
1 2026-06-15 0.68% 0.36% -0.32%
2 2026-03-18 0.65% 0.68% +0.04%
3 2026-03-17 — 0.65% —

Full EPSS history (21 records total)

Common vulnerability scoring system (CVSS) metrics for CVE-2022-3274

CVSS metrics for this CVE.

Base score Version Severity Vector Exploitability Impact Score source
3.5 3.1 LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N Click to expand
Attack vector (AV:N)
Could be attacked over the internet or any normal routed network—not just someone sitting at the machine.
Attack complexity (AC:L)
Once they can reach the bug, pulling it off is straightforward—no weird race conditions or rare setup.
Privileges required (PR:L)
A normal user session is enough; they don’t have to be admin.
User interaction (UI:R)
A real person has to do something—click, install, enable—otherwise it doesn’t land.
Scope (S:U)
Damage stays in the same “trust bubble” as the broken component—no big spill into unrelated systems.
Confidentiality (C:N)
Doesn’t really leak secrets in a meaningful way.
Integrity (I:L)
Attackers could change some data, but it’s limited—not everything goes.
Availability (A:N)
Service keeps running; no real outage angle.
 2.1 1.4 [email protected]
7.0 3.0 HIGH
CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:H Click to expand
Attack vector (AV:A)
Attacker has to be nearby on the network—same office, same link, that vibe—not the whole wide internet.
Attack complexity (AC:L)
Once they can reach the bug, pulling it off is straightforward—no weird race conditions or rare setup.
Privileges required (PR:L)
A normal user session is enough; they don’t have to be admin.
User interaction (UI:R)
A real person has to do something—click, install, enable—otherwise it doesn’t land.
Scope (S:U)
Damage stays in the same “trust bubble” as the broken component—no big spill into unrelated systems.
Confidentiality (C:H)
Serious risk that confidential data gets exposed in a big way.
Integrity (I:L)
Attackers could change some data, but it’s limited—not everything goes.
Availability (A:H)
Could take the service down hard or make it unusable for people who depend on it.
 1.5 5.5 [email protected]

Weakness enumeration for CVE-2022-3274

GitHub Security Advisory for CVE-2022-3274

GHSA-gmj8-84r4-h46j · Severity: high · Ecosystem: pip — rdiffweb Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability can lead to user email ID being changed

Affected software / configurations for CVE-2022-3274

Vendor Product Version Raw CPE
ikus-soft rdiffweb < 2.4.7 cpe:2.3:a:ikus-soft:rdiffweb:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

References for CVE-2022-3274

cvelogic Threat Intelligence