CVE-2022-35051

Exp

OTFCC commit 617837b was discovered to contain a heap buffer overflow via /release-x64/otfccdump+0x6b55af.

Published: 2022-10-14 Last update: 2024-11-21 Assigner: [email protected] Source: [email protected]

Conclusion & alert: CVE-2022-35051 is rated High Exploit Risk (63.1/100): CVSS Medium severity, with medium exploitation likelihood (EPSS 0.43%). Core evidence: 1 public exploit reference(s) are indexed (Exploit-DB). Mandatory action: Public exploits are available—assess exposure, apply mitigations, and prioritize patching.

Risk is dynamic; we continuously reassess and refresh what is shown on this page as upstream context changes.

Public exploit references (Exploit-DB) for CVE-2022-35051

EDB-ID Source Kind Published Link
nvd_ref exploit_tag Exploit-DB ↗

Exploit prediction scoring system (EPSS) score for CVE-2022-35051

EPSS lead: Daily EPSS estimates relative likelihood of exploitation; percentile ranks this CVE among scored vulnerabilities (higher = more severe relative rank).

# Date Old EPSS score New EPSS score Delta (New - Old)
1 2026-04-22 0.18% 0.43% +0.25%
2 2026-01-30 0.31% 0.18% -0.13%
3 2025-10-16 0.31%

Full EPSS history (9 records total)

Common vulnerability scoring system (CVSS) metrics for CVE-2022-35051

CVSS metrics for this CVE.

Base score Version Severity Vector Exploitability Impact Score source
6.5 3.1 MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H Click to expand
Attack vector (AV:N)
Could be attacked over the internet or any normal routed network—not just someone sitting at the machine.
Attack complexity (AC:L)
Once they can reach the bug, pulling it off is straightforward—no weird race conditions or rare setup.
Privileges required (PR:N)
No account or special rights needed—anonymous or random user is enough.
User interaction (UI:R)
A real person has to do something—click, install, enable—otherwise it doesn’t land.
Scope (S:U)
Damage stays in the same “trust bubble” as the broken component—no big spill into unrelated systems.
Confidentiality (C:N)
Doesn’t really leak secrets in a meaningful way.
Integrity (I:N)
Data isn’t meaningfully altered or forged.
Availability (A:H)
Could take the service down hard or make it unusable for people who depend on it.
2.8 3.6 [email protected]

Weakness enumeration for CVE-2022-35051

OS Trackers for CVE-2022-35051

vendor priority summary link
debian unimportant CVE-2022-35051 unimportant priority: Debian including 1 source packages (texlive-bin), 5 status rows across 5 suites (bookworm, bullseye, forky, sid, trixie): open 4, resolved 1. https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2022-35051
ubuntu negligible CVE-2022-35051 negligible priority: Ubuntu including 1 source packages (texlive-bin), 10 status rows across 10 suites (bionic, focal, jammy, kinetic, lunar, mantic, noble, trusty, upstream, xenial): not-affected 6, ignored 3, needs-triage 1. https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2022-35051

Affected software / configurations for CVE-2022-35051

Vendor Product Version Raw CPE
otfcc_project otfcc <= 0.10.4 cpe:2.3:a:otfcc_project:otfcc:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

References for CVE-2022-35051

cvelogic Threat Intelligence