CVE-2023-35952

Exp

Multiple stack-based buffer overflow vulnerabilities exist in the readOFF.cpp functionality of libigl v2.4.0. A specially-crafted .off file can lead to a buffer overflow. An attacker can arbitrary code execution to trigger these vulnerabilities.This vulnerability exists within the code responsible for parsing comments within the geometric faces section within an OFF file.

Published: 2024-05-28 Last update: 2026-06-17 Assigner: [email protected] Source: [email protected]
NVD Status：Analyzed，CVE State: published
View at NVD, CVE.org, EUVD

CVE-2023-35952 is rated High Exploit Risk (60/100): CVSS High severity, with low exploitation likelihood (EPSS 0.50%). 2 public exploit reference(s) are indexed (Exploit-DB). Public exploits are available—assess exposure, apply mitigations, and prioritize patching.

Risk is dynamic; we continuously reassess and refresh what is shown on this page as upstream context changes.

Public exploit references (Exploit-DB) for CVE-2023-35952

EDB-ID Source Kind Published Link
— nvd_ref exploit_tag Exploit-DB ↗
— nvd_ref exploit_tag Exploit-DB ↗

Exploit prediction scoring system (EPSS) score for CVE-2023-35952

EPSS lead: Daily EPSS estimates relative likelihood of exploitation; percentile ranks this CVE among scored vulnerabilities (higher = more severe relative rank).

# Date Old EPSS score New EPSS score Delta (New - Old)
1 2026-06-15 0.11% 0.50% +0.39%
2 2025-07-06 0.05% 0.11% +0.06%
3 2025-04-15 — 0.05% —

Full EPSS history (6 records total)

Common vulnerability scoring system (CVSS) metrics for CVE-2023-35952

CVSS metrics for this CVE.

Base score Version Severity Vector Exploitability Impact Score source
7.8 3.1 HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H Click to expand
Attack vector (AV:L)
They already need access on the box, or another person has to do something wrong; it’s not a remote drive-by.
Attack complexity (AC:L)
Once they can reach the bug, pulling it off is straightforward—no weird race conditions or rare setup.
Privileges required (PR:N)
No account or special rights needed—anonymous or random user is enough.
User interaction (UI:R)
A real person has to do something—click, install, enable—otherwise it doesn’t land.
Scope (S:U)
Damage stays in the same “trust bubble” as the broken component—no big spill into unrelated systems.
Confidentiality (C:H)
Serious risk that confidential data gets exposed in a big way.
Integrity (I:H)
They could widely tamper with or forge data—trust in the data is badly hurt.
Availability (A:H)
Could take the service down hard or make it unusable for people who depend on it.
 1.8 5.9 [email protected]

Weakness enumeration for CVE-2023-35952

OS Trackers for CVE-2023-35952

vendor priority summary link
ubuntu medium CVE-2023-35952 medium priority: Ubuntu including 1 source packages (slic3r-prusa), 9 status rows across 9 suites (bionic, focal, jammy, mantic, noble, oracular, plucky, questing, upstream): needs-triage 6, ignored 3. https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2023-35952

Affected software / configurations for CVE-2023-35952

Vendor Product Version Raw CPE
libigl libigl 2.4.0 cpe:2.3:a:libigl:libigl:2.4.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
libigl libigl 2.5.0 cpe:2.3:a:libigl:libigl:2.5.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

References for CVE-2023-35952

URL Tags
https://talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2023-1784 Exploit Mitigation Third Party Advisory
https://www.talosintelligence.com/vulnerability_reports/TALOS-2023-1784 Exploit Mitigation Third Party Advisory
cvelogic Threat Intelligence