CVE-2025-0426

A security issue was discovered in Kubernetes where a large number of container checkpoint requests made to the unauthenticated kubelet read-only HTTP endpoint may cause a Node Denial of Service by filling the Node's disk.

Published: 2025-02-13 Last update: 2026-04-15 Assigner: [email protected] Source: [email protected]

Conclusion & alert: CVE-2025-0426 is rated Low Risk (27.9/100): CVSS Medium severity, with low exploitation likelihood (EPSS 0.03%). Mandatory action: Monitor for updates and reassess as exploit intelligence or EPSS changes.

Risk is dynamic; we continuously reassess and refresh what is shown on this page as upstream context changes.

Exploit prediction scoring system (EPSS) score for CVE-2025-0426

EPSS lead: Daily EPSS estimates relative likelihood of exploitation; percentile ranks this CVE among scored vulnerabilities (higher = more severe relative rank).

# Date Old EPSS score New EPSS score Delta (New - Old)
1 2025-11-21 0.18% 0.03% -0.14%
2 2025-11-18 0.04% 0.18% +0.13%
3 2025-02-14 0.04%

Full EPSS history (3 records total)

Common vulnerability scoring system (CVSS) metrics for CVE-2025-0426

CVSS metrics for this CVE.

Base score Version Severity Vector Exploitability Impact Score source
6.2 3.1 MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H Click to expand
Attack vector (AV:L)
They already need access on the box, or another person has to do something wrong; it’s not a remote drive-by.
Attack complexity (AC:L)
Once they can reach the bug, pulling it off is straightforward—no weird race conditions or rare setup.
Privileges required (PR:N)
No account or special rights needed—anonymous or random user is enough.
User interaction (UI:N)
Nobody has to click “OK” or open a trap file; it can work without a victim helping.
Scope (S:U)
Damage stays in the same “trust bubble” as the broken component—no big spill into unrelated systems.
Confidentiality (C:N)
Doesn’t really leak secrets in a meaningful way.
Integrity (I:N)
Data isn’t meaningfully altered or forged.
Availability (A:H)
Could take the service down hard or make it unusable for people who depend on it.
2.5 3.6 [email protected]

Weakness enumeration for CVE-2025-0426

GitHub Security Advisory for CVE-2025-0426

GHSA-jgfp-53c3-624w · Severity: medium · Ecosystem: go — Node Denial of Service via kubelet Checkpoint API

OS Trackers for CVE-2025-0426

vendor priority summary link
alpine medium CVE-2025-0426: 1 source package rows (kubernetes); 1 state rows across 1 repos (3.21-community); fixed 1, open 0. https://security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2025-0426
debian not yet assigned CVE-2025-0426 not yet assigned priority: Debian including 1 source packages (kubernetes), 5 status rows across 5 suites (bookworm, bullseye, forky, sid, trixie): resolved 5. https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2025-0426
redhat medium https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-0426
suse medium https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-0426/
ubuntu medium CVE-2025-0426 medium priority: Ubuntu including 1 source packages (kubernetes), 6 status rows across 6 suites (focal, jammy, noble, oracular, plucky, upstream): not-affected 3, DNE 1, ignored 1, needs-triage 1. https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-0426

Affected software / configurations for CVE-2025-0426

Vendor Product Version Raw CPE
No affected products in dataset.

References for CVE-2025-0426

cvelogic Threat Intelligence