CVE-2025-21685 [Medium] | Security Vulnerability in Linux Kernel

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: platform/x86: lenovo-yoga-tab2-pro-1380-fastcharger: fix serdev race The yt2_1380_fc_serdev_probe() function calls devm_serdev_device_open() before setting the client ops via serdev_device_set_client_ops(). This ordering can trigger a NULL pointer dereference in the serdev controller's receive_buf handler, as it assumes serdev->ops is valid when SERPORT_ACTIVE is set. This is similar to the issue fixed in commit 5e700b384ec1 ("platform/chrome: cros_ec_uart: properly fix race condition") where devm_serdev_device_open() was called before fully initializing the device. Fix the race by ensuring client ops are set before enabling the port via devm_serdev_device_open(). Note, serdev_device_set_baudrate() and serdev_device_set_flow_control() calls should be after the devm_serdev_device_open() call.

#	Date	Old EPSS score	New EPSS score	Delta (New - Old)
1	2025-02-10	—	0.04%	—

Date

Old EPSS score

New EPSS score

Delta (New - Old)

2025-02-10

—

0.04%

—

Base score	Version	Severity	Vector	Exploitability	Impact	Score source
4.7	3.1	MEDIUM	`CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H` Click to expand Attack vector (AV:L) They already need access on the box, or another person has to do something wrong; it’s not a remote drive-by. Attack complexity (AC:H) Even with access, the exploit needs extra luck, timing, or a fussy environment to actually work. Privileges required (PR:L) A normal user session is enough; they don’t have to be admin. User interaction (UI:N) Nobody has to click “OK” or open a trap file; it can work without a victim helping. Scope (S:U) Damage stays in the same “trust bubble” as the broken component—no big spill into unrelated systems. Confidentiality (C:N) Doesn’t really leak secrets in a meaningful way. Integrity (I:N) Data isn’t meaningfully altered or forged. Availability (A:H) Could take the service down hard or make it unusable for people who depend on it.	1.0	3.6	[email protected]
4.7	3.1	MEDIUM	`CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H` Click to expand Attack vector (AV:L) They already need access on the box, or another person has to do something wrong; it’s not a remote drive-by. Attack complexity (AC:H) Even with access, the exploit needs extra luck, timing, or a fussy environment to actually work. Privileges required (PR:L) A normal user session is enough; they don’t have to be admin. User interaction (UI:N) Nobody has to click “OK” or open a trap file; it can work without a victim helping. Scope (S:U) Damage stays in the same “trust bubble” as the broken component—no big spill into unrelated systems. Confidentiality (C:N) Doesn’t really leak secrets in a meaningful way. Integrity (I:N) Data isn’t meaningfully altered or forged. Availability (A:H) Could take the service down hard or make it unusable for people who depend on it.	1.0	3.6	134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0

Base score

Version

Severity

Vector

Exploitability

Impact

Score source

4.7

3.1

MEDIUM

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H Click to expand

Attack vector (AV:L): They already need access on the box, or another person has to do something wrong; it’s not a remote drive-by.
Attack complexity (AC:H): Even with access, the exploit needs extra luck, timing, or a fussy environment to actually work.
Privileges required (PR:L): A normal user session is enough; they don’t have to be admin.
User interaction (UI:N): Nobody has to click “OK” or open a trap file; it can work without a victim helping.
Scope (S:U): Damage stays in the same “trust bubble” as the broken component—no big spill into unrelated systems.
Confidentiality (C:N): Doesn’t really leak secrets in a meaningful way.
Integrity (I:N): Data isn’t meaningfully altered or forged.
Availability (A:H): Could take the service down hard or make it unusable for people who depend on it.

1.0

3.6

[email protected]

4.7

3.1

MEDIUM

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H Click to expand

Attack vector (AV:L): They already need access on the box, or another person has to do something wrong; it’s not a remote drive-by.
Attack complexity (AC:H): Even with access, the exploit needs extra luck, timing, or a fussy environment to actually work.
Privileges required (PR:L): A normal user session is enough; they don’t have to be admin.
User interaction (UI:N): Nobody has to click “OK” or open a trap file; it can work without a victim helping.
Scope (S:U): Damage stays in the same “trust bubble” as the broken component—no big spill into unrelated systems.
Confidentiality (C:N): Doesn’t really leak secrets in a meaningful way.
Integrity (I:N): Data isn’t meaningfully altered or forged.
Availability (A:H): Could take the service down hard or make it unusable for people who depend on it.

1.0

3.6

134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0

OS Trackers for CVE-2025-21685

vendor	priority	summary	link
`debian`	unimportant	CVE-2025-21685 unimportant priority: Debian including 1 source packages (linux), 5 status rows across 5 suites (bookworm, bullseye, forky, sid, trixie): resolved 5.	https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2025-21685
`redhat`	low	—	https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-21685
`suse`	medium	CVE-2025-21685 severity moderate: SUSE including 52 source package names (cluster-md-kmp-default, dlm-kmp-default, …), 271 product×package rows across 47 product lines (SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2, SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 12 SP5, … (47 product lines)): Known Not Affected 245, Fixed 26.	https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-21685/
`ubuntu`	medium	CVE-2025-21685 medium priority: Ubuntu including 150 source packages (linux, linux-allwinner-5.19, …), 1483 status rows across 10 suites (bionic, focal, jammy, noble, oracular, plucky, questing, trusty, upstream, xenial): DNE 1093, ignored 147, not-affected 144, released 99.	https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-21685

Affected software / configurations for CVE-2025-21685

Vendor	Product	Version	Raw CPE
linux	linux_kernel	>= 6.10, < 6.12.11	cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel::::::::
linux	linux_kernel	6.13	cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.13:rc1::::::
linux	linux_kernel	6.13	cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.13:rc2::::::
linux	linux_kernel	6.13	cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.13:rc3::::::
linux	linux_kernel	6.13	cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.13:rc4::::::
linux	linux_kernel	6.13	cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.13:rc5::::::
linux	linux_kernel	6.13	cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.13:rc6::::::
linux	linux_kernel	6.13	cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.13:rc7::::::

References for CVE-2025-21685

URL	Tags
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/3f67e07873df3c6d9ce2582260b83732e1d3a40b	Patch
https://git.kernel.org/stable/c/59616a91e5e74833b2008b56c66879857c616006	Patch

URL

CVE-2025-21685 | platform/x86: lenovo-yoga-tab2-pro-1380-fastcharger: fix serdev race

Exploit prediction scoring system (EPSS) score for CVE-2025-21685

Common vulnerability scoring system (CVSS) metrics for CVE-2025-21685

Weakness enumeration for CVE-2025-21685

OS Trackers for CVE-2025-21685

Affected software / configurations for CVE-2025-21685

References for CVE-2025-21685