CVE-2025-22445 | Misleading UI for undefined admin console settings in Calls causes security confusion

Mattermost versions 10.x <= 10.2 fail to accurately reflect missing settings, which allows confusion for admins regarding a Calls security-sensitive configuration via incorrect UI reporting.

Published: 2025-01-09 Last update: 2025-10-02 Assigner: [email protected] Source: [email protected]

Conclusion & alert: CVE-2025-22445 is rated Low Risk (31.7/100): CVSS Low severity, with medium exploitation likelihood (EPSS 0.27%). Mandatory action: Monitor for updates and reassess as exploit intelligence or EPSS changes.

Risk is dynamic; we continuously reassess and refresh what is shown on this page as upstream context changes.

Exploit prediction scoring system (EPSS) score for CVE-2025-22445

EPSS lead: Daily EPSS estimates relative likelihood of exploitation; percentile ranks this CVE among scored vulnerabilities (higher = more severe relative rank).

# Date Old EPSS score New EPSS score Delta (New - Old)
1 2026-05-31 0.18% 0.27% +0.08%
2 2026-02-17 0.12% 0.18% +0.07%
3 2025-11-21 0.12%

Full EPSS history (8 records total)

Common vulnerability scoring system (CVSS) metrics for CVE-2025-22445

CVSS metrics for this CVE.

Base score Version Severity Vector Exploitability Impact Score source
3.5 3.1 LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N Click to expand
Attack vector (AV:N)
Could be attacked over the internet or any normal routed network—not just someone sitting at the machine.
Attack complexity (AC:L)
Once they can reach the bug, pulling it off is straightforward—no weird race conditions or rare setup.
Privileges required (PR:L)
A normal user session is enough; they don’t have to be admin.
User interaction (UI:R)
A real person has to do something—click, install, enable—otherwise it doesn’t land.
Scope (S:U)
Damage stays in the same “trust bubble” as the broken component—no big spill into unrelated systems.
Confidentiality (C:L)
Some sensitive info could get out, but not a total data dump.
Integrity (I:N)
Data isn’t meaningfully altered or forged.
Availability (A:N)
Service keeps running; no real outage angle.
2.1 1.4 [email protected]
5.3 3.1 MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N Click to expand
Attack vector (AV:N)
Could be attacked over the internet or any normal routed network—not just someone sitting at the machine.
Attack complexity (AC:L)
Once they can reach the bug, pulling it off is straightforward—no weird race conditions or rare setup.
Privileges required (PR:N)
No account or special rights needed—anonymous or random user is enough.
User interaction (UI:N)
Nobody has to click “OK” or open a trap file; it can work without a victim helping.
Scope (S:U)
Damage stays in the same “trust bubble” as the broken component—no big spill into unrelated systems.
Confidentiality (C:L)
Some sensitive info could get out, but not a total data dump.
Integrity (I:N)
Data isn’t meaningfully altered or forged.
Availability (A:N)
Service keeps running; no real outage angle.
3.9 1.4 [email protected]

Weakness enumeration for CVE-2025-22445

GitHub Security Advisory for CVE-2025-22445

GHSA-7rgp-4j56-fm79 · Severity: low · Ecosystem: go — Mattermost has Improper Check for Unusual or Exceptional Conditions

OS Trackers for CVE-2025-22445

vendor priority summary link
redhat low https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-22445

Affected software / configurations for CVE-2025-22445

Vendor Product Version Raw CPE
mattermost mattermost_server >= 10.0.0, < 10.3.0 cpe:2.3:a:mattermost:mattermost_server:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

References for CVE-2025-22445

URL Tags
https://mattermost.com/security-updates Vendor Advisory
cvelogic Threat Intelligence