CVE-2025-27795 [Medium] | Security Vulnerability in Graphicsmagick

CVE-2025-27795 is rated Low Risk (25.2/100): CVSS Medium severity, with low exploitation likelihood (EPSS 0.08%). Monitor for updates and reassess as exploit intelligence or EPSS changes.

#	Date	Old EPSS score	New EPSS score	Delta (New - Old)
1	2026-04-15	0.27%	0.08%	-0.19%
2	2026-01-30	0.06%	0.27%	+0.21%
3	2025-09-18	—	0.06%	—

Date

Old EPSS score

New EPSS score

Delta (New - Old)

2026-04-15

0.27%

0.08%

-0.19%

2026-01-30

0.06%

0.27%

+0.21%

2025-09-18

—

0.06%

—

Base score	Version	Severity	Vector	Exploitability	Impact	Score source
4.3	3.1	MEDIUM	`CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:L` Click to expand Attack vector (AV:L) They already need access on the box, or another person has to do something wrong; it’s not a remote drive-by. Attack complexity (AC:L) Once they can reach the bug, pulling it off is straightforward—no weird race conditions or rare setup. Privileges required (PR:N) No account or special rights needed—anonymous or random user is enough. User interaction (UI:N) Nobody has to click “OK” or open a trap file; it can work without a victim helping. Scope (S:C) Breaking this can reach past the original component and bite other resources—bigger blast radius. Confidentiality (C:N) Doesn’t really leak secrets in a meaningful way. Integrity (I:N) Data isn’t meaningfully altered or forged. Availability (A:L) Might cause slowdowns, glitches, or partial disruption—not a full brick.	2.5	1.4	[email protected]
7.5	3.1	HIGH	`CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H` Click to expand Attack vector (AV:N) Could be attacked over the internet or any normal routed network—not just someone sitting at the machine. Attack complexity (AC:L) Once they can reach the bug, pulling it off is straightforward—no weird race conditions or rare setup. Privileges required (PR:N) No account or special rights needed—anonymous or random user is enough. User interaction (UI:N) Nobody has to click “OK” or open a trap file; it can work without a victim helping. Scope (S:U) Damage stays in the same “trust bubble” as the broken component—no big spill into unrelated systems. Confidentiality (C:N) Doesn’t really leak secrets in a meaningful way. Integrity (I:N) Data isn’t meaningfully altered or forged. Availability (A:H) Could take the service down hard or make it unusable for people who depend on it.	3.9	3.6	[email protected]

Base score

Version

Severity

Vector

Exploitability

Impact

Score source

4.3

3.1

MEDIUM

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:L Click to expand

Attack vector (AV:L): They already need access on the box, or another person has to do something wrong; it’s not a remote drive-by.
Attack complexity (AC:L): Once they can reach the bug, pulling it off is straightforward—no weird race conditions or rare setup.
Privileges required (PR:N): No account or special rights needed—anonymous or random user is enough.
User interaction (UI:N): Nobody has to click “OK” or open a trap file; it can work without a victim helping.
Scope (S:C): Breaking this can reach past the original component and bite other resources—bigger blast radius.
Confidentiality (C:N): Doesn’t really leak secrets in a meaningful way.
Integrity (I:N): Data isn’t meaningfully altered or forged.
Availability (A:L): Might cause slowdowns, glitches, or partial disruption—not a full brick.

2.5

1.4

[email protected]

7.5

3.1

HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H Click to expand

Attack vector (AV:N): Could be attacked over the internet or any normal routed network—not just someone sitting at the machine.
Attack complexity (AC:L): Once they can reach the bug, pulling it off is straightforward—no weird race conditions or rare setup.
Privileges required (PR:N): No account or special rights needed—anonymous or random user is enough.
User interaction (UI:N): Nobody has to click “OK” or open a trap file; it can work without a victim helping.
Scope (S:U): Damage stays in the same “trust bubble” as the broken component—no big spill into unrelated systems.
Confidentiality (C:N): Doesn’t really leak secrets in a meaningful way.
Integrity (I:N): Data isn’t meaningfully altered or forged.
Availability (A:H): Could take the service down hard or make it unusable for people who depend on it.

3.9

3.6

[email protected]

OS Trackers for CVE-2025-27795

vendor	priority	summary	link
`alpine`	—	CVE-2025-27795: 1 source package rows (graphicsmagick); 31 state rows across 2 repos (3.22-community, edge-community); fixed 0, open 31.	https://security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2025-27795
`debian`	unimportant	CVE-2025-27795 unimportant priority: Debian including 1 source packages (graphicsmagick), 5 status rows across 5 suites (bookworm, bullseye, forky, sid, trixie): resolved 5.	https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2025-27795
`suse`	medium	CVE-2025-27795 severity moderate: SUSE including 43 source package names (GraphicsMagick-1.3.42-150600.3.4.1, GraphicsMagick-1.3.45-2.1, …), 256 product×package rows across 32 product lines (SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2, SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3-LTSS, … (32 product lines)): Known Not Affected 232, Fixed 24.	https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-27795/
`ubuntu`	medium	CVE-2025-27795 medium priority: Ubuntu including 1 source packages (graphicsmagick), 10 status rows across 10 suites (bionic, focal, jammy, noble, oracular, plucky, questing, trusty, upstream, xenial): not-affected 6, released 4.	https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-27795

Affected software / configurations for CVE-2025-27795

Vendor	Product	Version	Raw CPE
graphicsmagick	graphicsmagick	< 1.3.46	cpe:2.3:a:graphicsmagick:graphicsmagick::::::::

References for CVE-2025-27795

URL	Tags
http://www.graphicsmagick.org/NEWS.html	Release Notes
https://foss.heptapod.net/graphicsmagick/graphicsmagick/-/commit/9bbae7314e3c3b19b830591010ed90bb136b9c42	Patch
https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl/issues/3792#issuecomment-2330978387	Issue Tracking
https://github.com/libjxl/libjxl/issues/3793#issuecomment-2334843280	Issue Tracking
https://issues.oss-fuzz.com/issues/42536330#comment6	Issue Tracking

URL

CVE-2025-27795

Exploit prediction scoring system (EPSS) score for CVE-2025-27795

Common vulnerability scoring system (CVSS) metrics for CVE-2025-27795

Weakness enumeration for CVE-2025-27795

OS Trackers for CVE-2025-27795

Affected software / configurations for CVE-2025-27795

References for CVE-2025-27795