CVE-2025-32049 | Libsoup: denial of service attack to websocket server

A flaw was found in libsoup. The SoupWebsocketConnection may accept a large WebSocket message, which may cause libsoup to allocate memory and lead to a denial of service (DoS).

Published: 2025-04-03 Last update: 2026-04-15 Assigner: [email protected] Source: [email protected]

Conclusion & alert: CVE-2025-32049 is rated Moderate Risk (46.8/100): CVSS High severity, with low exploitation likelihood (EPSS 0.69%). Mandatory action: Review affected assets and schedule remediation.

Risk is dynamic; we continuously reassess and refresh what is shown on this page as upstream context changes.

Exploit prediction scoring system (EPSS) score for CVE-2025-32049

EPSS lead: Daily EPSS estimates relative likelihood of exploitation; percentile ranks this CVE among scored vulnerabilities (higher = more severe relative rank).

# Date Old EPSS score New EPSS score Delta (New - Old)
1 2026-06-15 0.60% 0.69% +0.08%
2 2026-05-12 1.56% 0.60% -0.95%
3 2026-03-22 1.56%

Full EPSS history (21 records total)

Common vulnerability scoring system (CVSS) metrics for CVE-2025-32049

CVSS metrics for this CVE.

Base score Version Severity Vector Exploitability Impact Score source
7.5 3.1 HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H Click to expand
Attack vector (AV:N)
Could be attacked over the internet or any normal routed network—not just someone sitting at the machine.
Attack complexity (AC:L)
Once they can reach the bug, pulling it off is straightforward—no weird race conditions or rare setup.
Privileges required (PR:N)
No account or special rights needed—anonymous or random user is enough.
User interaction (UI:N)
Nobody has to click “OK” or open a trap file; it can work without a victim helping.
Scope (S:U)
Damage stays in the same “trust bubble” as the broken component—no big spill into unrelated systems.
Confidentiality (C:N)
Doesn’t really leak secrets in a meaningful way.
Integrity (I:N)
Data isn’t meaningfully altered or forged.
Availability (A:H)
Could take the service down hard or make it unusable for people who depend on it.
3.9 3.6 [email protected]

Weakness enumeration for CVE-2025-32049

OS Trackers for CVE-2025-32049

vendor priority summary link
debian not yet assigned CVE-2025-32049 not yet assigned priority: Debian including 2 source packages (libsoup2.4, libsoup3), 7 status rows across 5 suites (bookworm, bullseye, forky, sid, trixie): open 7. https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2025-32049
redhat medium https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-32049
suse high CVE-2025-32049 severity important: SUSE including 58 source package names (libsoup-2.62.2-6.el7_9, libsoup-2.62.3-9.el8_10, …), 205 product×package rows across 44 product lines (Image SLE-Micro, Image SLE-Micro-Azure, … (44 product lines)): Fixed 201, First Fixed 4. https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-32049/
ubuntu medium CVE-2025-32049 medium priority: Ubuntu including 2 source packages (libsoup2.4, libsoup3), 16 status rows across 9 suites (bionic, focal, jammy, noble, oracular, plucky, questing, upstream, xenial): needed 11, ignored 4, DNE 1. https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-32049

Affected software / configurations for CVE-2025-32049

Vendor Product Version Raw CPE
No affected products in dataset.

References for CVE-2025-32049

cvelogic Threat Intelligence