CVE-2025-32050 | Libsoup: integer overflow in append_param_quoted

A flaw was found in libsoup. The libsoup append_param_quoted() function may contain an overflow bug resulting in a buffer under-read.

Published: 2025-04-03 Last update: 2026-04-15 Assigner: [email protected] Source: [email protected]
NVD Status：Deferred，CVE State: published
View at NVD, CVE.org, EUVD

CVE-2025-32050 is rated Moderate Risk (42.5/100): CVSS Medium severity, with medium exploitation likelihood (EPSS 0.33%). Review affected assets and schedule remediation.

Risk is dynamic; we continuously reassess and refresh what is shown on this page as upstream context changes.

Exploit prediction scoring system (EPSS) score for CVE-2025-32050

EPSS lead: Daily EPSS estimates relative likelihood of exploitation; percentile ranks this CVE among scored vulnerabilities (higher = more severe relative rank).

# Date Old EPSS score New EPSS score Delta (New - Old)
1 2026-05-12 0.88% 0.33% -0.55%
2 2026-01-28 0.15% 0.88% +0.73%
3 2025-12-07 — 0.15% —

Full EPSS history (7 records total)

Common vulnerability scoring system (CVSS) metrics for CVE-2025-32050

CVSS metrics for this CVE.

Base score Version Severity Vector Exploitability Impact Score source
5.9 3.1 MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H Click to expand
Attack vector (AV:N)
Could be attacked over the internet or any normal routed network—not just someone sitting at the machine.
Attack complexity (AC:H)
Even with access, the exploit needs extra luck, timing, or a fussy environment to actually work.
Privileges required (PR:N)
No account or special rights needed—anonymous or random user is enough.
User interaction (UI:N)
Nobody has to click “OK” or open a trap file; it can work without a victim helping.
Scope (S:U)
Damage stays in the same “trust bubble” as the broken component—no big spill into unrelated systems.
Confidentiality (C:N)
Doesn’t really leak secrets in a meaningful way.
Integrity (I:N)
Data isn’t meaningfully altered or forged.
Availability (A:H)
Could take the service down hard or make it unusable for people who depend on it.
 2.2 3.6 [email protected]

Weakness enumeration for CVE-2025-32050

OS Trackers for CVE-2025-32050

vendor priority summary link
debian not yet assigned CVE-2025-32050 not yet assigned priority: Debian including 2 source packages (libsoup2.4, libsoup3), 7 status rows across 5 suites (bookworm, bullseye, forky, sid, trixie): resolved 6, open 1. https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2025-32050
redhat medium — https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-32050
suse medium CVE-2025-32050 severity moderate: SUSE including 57 source package names (2.2.1-7.31:libvmtools0-13.0.5-160000.1.1, 2.2.1-7.31:open-vm-tools-13.0.5-160000.1.1, …), 259 product×package rows across 51 product lines (Container suse/sl-micro/6.0/baremetal-os-container, Container suse/sl-micro/6.0/base-os-container, … (51 product lines)): Fixed 259. https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-32050/
ubuntu medium CVE-2025-32050 medium priority: Ubuntu including 2 source packages (libsoup2.4, libsoup3), 16 status rows across 9 suites (bionic, focal, jammy, noble, oracular, plucky, questing, upstream, xenial): released 11, not-affected 4, DNE 1. https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-32050

Affected software / configurations for CVE-2025-32050

Vendor Product Version Raw CPE
No affected products in dataset.

References for CVE-2025-32050

cvelogic Threat Intelligence