CVE-2025-3360 | Glibc: glib prior to 2.82.5 is vulnerable to integer overflow and buffer under-read when parsing a very long invalid iso 8601 timestamp with g_date_time_new_from_iso8601().

A flaw was found in GLib. An integer overflow and buffer under-read occur when parsing a long invalid ISO 8601 timestamp with the g_date_time_new_from_iso8601() function.

Published: 2025-04-07 Last update: 2026-04-15 Assigner: [email protected] Source: [email protected]
NVD Status：Deferred，CVE State: published
View at NVD, CVE.org, EUVD

CVE-2025-3360 is rated Low Risk (25.5/100): CVSS Low severity, with low exploitation likelihood (EPSS 0.13%). Monitor for updates and reassess as exploit intelligence or EPSS changes.

Risk is dynamic; we continuously reassess and refresh what is shown on this page as upstream context changes.

Exploit prediction scoring system (EPSS) score for CVE-2025-3360

EPSS lead: Daily EPSS estimates relative likelihood of exploitation; percentile ranks this CVE among scored vulnerabilities (higher = more severe relative rank).

# Date Old EPSS score New EPSS score Delta (New - Old)
1 2026-05-16 0.39% 0.13% -0.27%
2 2026-02-01 0.06% 0.39% +0.33%
3 2025-04-13 — 0.06% —

Full EPSS history (4 records total)

Common vulnerability scoring system (CVSS) metrics for CVE-2025-3360

CVSS metrics for this CVE.

Base score Version Severity Vector Exploitability Impact Score source
3.7 3.1 LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L Click to expand
Attack vector (AV:N)
Could be attacked over the internet or any normal routed network—not just someone sitting at the machine.
Attack complexity (AC:H)
Even with access, the exploit needs extra luck, timing, or a fussy environment to actually work.
Privileges required (PR:N)
No account or special rights needed—anonymous or random user is enough.
User interaction (UI:N)
Nobody has to click “OK” or open a trap file; it can work without a victim helping.
Scope (S:U)
Damage stays in the same “trust bubble” as the broken component—no big spill into unrelated systems.
Confidentiality (C:N)
Doesn’t really leak secrets in a meaningful way.
Integrity (I:N)
Data isn’t meaningfully altered or forged.
Availability (A:L)
Might cause slowdowns, glitches, or partial disruption—not a full brick.
 2.2 1.4 [email protected]

Weakness enumeration for CVE-2025-3360

OS Trackers for CVE-2025-3360

vendor priority summary link
debian not yet assigned CVE-2025-3360 not yet assigned priority: Debian including 1 source packages (glib2.0), 5 status rows across 5 suites (bookworm, bullseye, forky, sid, trixie): resolved 5. https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2025-3360
redhat low — https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-3360
suse medium CVE-2025-3360 severity moderate: SUSE including 516 source package names (0.23.1-12.3:glib2-tools-2.78.6-150600.4.11.1, 0.23.1-12.3:libgio-2_0-0-2.78.6-150600.4.11.1, …), 1952 product×package rows across 333 product lines (Container bci/gcc, Container bci/golang, … (333 product lines)): Fixed 1661, Known Affected 221, Known Not Affected 70. https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-3360/
ubuntu low CVE-2025-3360 low priority: Ubuntu including 1 source packages (glib2.0), 10 status rows across 10 suites (bionic, focal, jammy, noble, oracular, plucky, questing, trusty, upstream, xenial): released 5, not-affected 4, ignored 1. https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-3360

Affected software / configurations for CVE-2025-3360

Vendor Product Version Raw CPE
No affected products in dataset.

References for CVE-2025-3360

cvelogic Threat Intelligence