CVE-2025-49600

In MbedTLS 3.3.0 before 3.6.4, mbedtls_lms_verify may accept invalid signatures if hash computation fails and internal errors go unchecked, enabling LMS (Leighton-Micali Signature) forgery in a fault scenario. Specifically, unchecked return values in mbedtls_lms_verify allow an attacker (who can induce a hardware hash accelerator fault) to bypass LMS signature verification by reusing stale stack data, resulting in acceptance of an invalid signature. In mbedtls_lms_verify, the return values of the internal Merkle tree functions create_merkle_leaf_value and create_merkle_internal_value are not checked. These functions return an integer that indicates whether the call succeeded or not. If a failure occurs, the output buffer (Tc_candidate_root_node) may remain uninitialized, and the result of the signature verification is unpredictable. When the software implementation of SHA-256 is used, these functions will not fail. However, with hardware-accelerated hashing, an attacker could use fault injection against the accelerator to bypass verification.

Published: 2025-07-04 Last update: 2026-06-05 Assigner: [email protected] Source: [email protected]

Conclusion & alert: CVE-2025-49600 is rated Low Risk (20.7/100): CVSS Medium severity, with low exploitation likelihood (EPSS 0.13%). Mandatory action: Monitor for updates and reassess as exploit intelligence or EPSS changes.

Risk is dynamic; we continuously reassess and refresh what is shown on this page as upstream context changes.

Exploit prediction scoring system (EPSS) score for CVE-2025-49600

EPSS lead: Daily EPSS estimates relative likelihood of exploitation; percentile ranks this CVE among scored vulnerabilities (higher = more severe relative rank).

# Date Old EPSS score New EPSS score Delta (New - Old)
1 2026-06-15 0.01% 0.13% +0.11%
2 2025-07-05 0.01%

Full EPSS history (2 records total)

Common vulnerability scoring system (CVSS) metrics for CVE-2025-49600

CVSS metrics for this CVE.

Base score Version Severity Vector Exploitability Impact Score source
4.9 3.1 MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N Click to expand
Attack vector (AV:P)
Hands-on access—USB, keyboard, opening the case—not something you do purely over the wire.
Attack complexity (AC:H)
Even with access, the exploit needs extra luck, timing, or a fussy environment to actually work.
Privileges required (PR:N)
No account or special rights needed—anonymous or random user is enough.
User interaction (UI:N)
Nobody has to click “OK” or open a trap file; it can work without a victim helping.
Scope (S:C)
Breaking this can reach past the original component and bite other resources—bigger blast radius.
Confidentiality (C:N)
Doesn’t really leak secrets in a meaningful way.
Integrity (I:H)
They could widely tamper with or forge data—trust in the data is badly hurt.
Availability (A:N)
Service keeps running; no real outage angle.
0.5 4.0 [email protected]

Weakness enumeration for CVE-2025-49600

OS Trackers for CVE-2025-49600

vendor priority summary link
alpine CVE-2025-49600: 1 source package rows (mbedtls); 18 state rows across 4 repos (3.20-main, 3.21-main, 3.22-main, edge-main); fixed 4, open 14. https://security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2025-49600
debian unimportant CVE-2025-49600 unimportant priority: Debian including 1 source packages (mbedtls), 5 status rows across 5 suites (bookworm, bullseye, forky, sid, trixie): resolved 5. https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2025-49600
ubuntu medium CVE-2025-49600 medium priority: Ubuntu including 1 source packages (mbedtls), 9 status rows across 9 suites (bionic, focal, jammy, noble, oracular, plucky, questing, upstream, xenial): not-affected 5, ignored 2, needed 1, released 1. https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-49600

Affected software / configurations for CVE-2025-49600

Vendor Product Version Raw CPE
trustedfirmware mbed_tls >= 3.3.0, < 3.6.4 cpe:2.3:a:trustedfirmware:mbed_tls:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

References for CVE-2025-49600

cvelogic Threat Intelligence