CVE-2025-60019 | Glib-networking: uninitialized memory dereferences on glib-networking through glib-networking/tls/openssl/gtlsbio.c via g_tls_bio_new_from_iostream() and g_tls_bio_new_from_datagram_based()

glib-networking's OpenSSL backend fails to properly check the return value of memory allocation routines. An out of memory condition could potentially result in writing to an invalid memory location.

Published: 2025-09-25 Last update: 2026-04-15 Assigner: [email protected] Source: [email protected]
NVD Status：Deferred，CVE State: published
View at NVD, CVE.org, EUVD

CVE-2025-60019 is rated Low Risk (17.8/100): CVSS Low severity, with low exploitation likelihood (EPSS 0.03%). Low composite risk—no urgent action required; patch on your normal maintenance cycle and revisit priority if CVSS or EPSS increases.

Risk is dynamic; we continuously reassess and refresh what is shown on this page as upstream context changes.

Exploit prediction scoring system (EPSS) score for CVE-2025-60019

EPSS lead: Daily EPSS estimates relative likelihood of exploitation; percentile ranks this CVE among scored vulnerabilities (higher = more severe relative rank).

# Date Old EPSS score New EPSS score Delta (New - Old)
1 2026-02-21 0.06% 0.03% -0.03%
2 2026-01-25 0.03% 0.06% +0.03%
3 2025-09-26 — 0.03% —

Full EPSS history (3 records total)

Common vulnerability scoring system (CVSS) metrics for CVE-2025-60019

CVSS metrics for this CVE.

Base score Version Severity Vector Exploitability Impact Score source
3.7 3.1 LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L Click to expand
Attack vector (AV:N)
Could be attacked over the internet or any normal routed network—not just someone sitting at the machine.
Attack complexity (AC:H)
Even with access, the exploit needs extra luck, timing, or a fussy environment to actually work.
Privileges required (PR:N)
No account or special rights needed—anonymous or random user is enough.
User interaction (UI:N)
Nobody has to click “OK” or open a trap file; it can work without a victim helping.
Scope (S:U)
Damage stays in the same “trust bubble” as the broken component—no big spill into unrelated systems.
Confidentiality (C:N)
Doesn’t really leak secrets in a meaningful way.
Integrity (I:N)
Data isn’t meaningfully altered or forged.
Availability (A:L)
Might cause slowdowns, glitches, or partial disruption—not a full brick.
 2.2 1.4 [email protected]

Weakness enumeration for CVE-2025-60019

OS Trackers for CVE-2025-60019

vendor priority summary link
debian unimportant CVE-2025-60019 unimportant priority: Debian including 1 source packages (glib-networking), 5 status rows across 5 suites (bookworm, bullseye, forky, sid, trixie): open 5. https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2025-60019
redhat low — https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-60019
suse medium CVE-2025-60019 severity moderate: SUSE including 3 source package names (glib-networking, glib-networking-32bit, glib-networking-lang), 58 product×package rows across 34 product lines (SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2, SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP3-LTSS, … (34 product lines)): Known Not Affected 58. https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-60019/
ubuntu medium CVE-2025-60019 medium priority: Ubuntu including 1 source packages (glib-networking), 7 status rows across 7 suites (bionic, focal, jammy, noble, plucky, upstream, xenial): not-affected 6, needs-triage 1. https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-60019

Affected software / configurations for CVE-2025-60019

Vendor Product Version Raw CPE
No affected products in dataset.

References for CVE-2025-60019

cvelogic Threat Intelligence