CVE-2025-60751

Exp

GeographicLib 2.5 is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow in GeoConvert DMS::InternalDecode.

Published: 2025-10-21 Last update: 2026-04-15 Assigner: [email protected] Source: [email protected]
NVD Status：Deferred，CVE State: published
View at NVD, CVE.org, EUVD

CVE-2025-60751 is rated High Exploit Risk (70/100): CVSS High severity, with medium exploitation likelihood (EPSS 0.60%). 1 public exploit reference(s) are indexed (Exploit-DB). Public exploits are available—assess exposure, apply mitigations, and prioritize patching.

Risk is dynamic; we continuously reassess and refresh what is shown on this page as upstream context changes.

Public exploit references (Exploit-DB) for CVE-2025-60751

EDB-ID Source Kind Published Link
52522 exploit_db edb 2026-04-29 Exploit-DB ↗

Exploit prediction scoring system (EPSS) score for CVE-2025-60751

EPSS lead: Daily EPSS estimates relative likelihood of exploitation; percentile ranks this CVE among scored vulnerabilities (higher = more severe relative rank).

# Date Old EPSS score New EPSS score Delta (New - Old)
1 2026-04-30 0.02% 0.60% +0.59%
2 2025-11-21 0.05% 0.02% -0.04%
3 2025-10-27 — 0.05% —

Full EPSS history (4 records total)

Common vulnerability scoring system (CVSS) metrics for CVE-2025-60751

CVSS metrics for this CVE.

Base score Version Severity Vector Exploitability Impact Score source
7.5 3.1 HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H Click to expand
Attack vector (AV:N)
Could be attacked over the internet or any normal routed network—not just someone sitting at the machine.
Attack complexity (AC:L)
Once they can reach the bug, pulling it off is straightforward—no weird race conditions or rare setup.
Privileges required (PR:N)
No account or special rights needed—anonymous or random user is enough.
User interaction (UI:N)
Nobody has to click “OK” or open a trap file; it can work without a victim helping.
Scope (S:U)
Damage stays in the same “trust bubble” as the broken component—no big spill into unrelated systems.
Confidentiality (C:N)
Doesn’t really leak secrets in a meaningful way.
Integrity (I:N)
Data isn’t meaningfully altered or forged.
Availability (A:H)
Could take the service down hard or make it unusable for people who depend on it.
 3.9 3.6 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0

Weakness enumeration for CVE-2025-60751

OS Trackers for CVE-2025-60751

vendor priority summary link
debian not yet assigned CVE-2025-60751 not yet assigned priority: Debian including 1 source packages (geographiclib), 5 status rows across 5 suites (bookworm, bullseye, forky, sid, trixie): resolved 3, open 2. https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2025-60751
ubuntu medium CVE-2025-60751 medium priority: Ubuntu including 1 source packages (geographiclib), 8 status rows across 8 suites (bionic, focal, jammy, noble, plucky, questing, upstream, xenial): needs-triage 6, ignored 1, released 1. https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-60751

Affected software / configurations for CVE-2025-60751

Vendor Product Version Raw CPE
No affected products in dataset.

References for CVE-2025-60751

cvelogic Threat Intelligence