CVE-2025-64344 | Suricata is vulnerable to a stack overflow from unbounded stack allocation in LuaPushStringBuffer

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published: 2025-11-26 Last update: 2026-06-17 Assigner: [email protected] Source: [email protected]

Conclusion & alert: CVE-2025-64344 is rated Low Risk (37.6/100): CVSS High severity, with low exploitation likelihood (EPSS 0.29%). Mandatory action: Monitor for updates and reassess as exploit intelligence or EPSS changes.

Risk is dynamic; we continuously reassess and refresh what is shown on this page as upstream context changes.

Exploit prediction scoring system (EPSS) score for CVE-2025-64344

EPSS lead: Daily EPSS estimates relative likelihood of exploitation; percentile ranks this CVE among scored vulnerabilities (higher = more severe relative rank).

# Date Old EPSS score New EPSS score Delta (New - Old)
1 2026-06-15 0.05% 0.29% +0.24%
2 2025-12-28 0.05% 0.05% +0.00%
3 2025-12-04 0.05%

Full EPSS history (5 records total)

Common vulnerability scoring system (CVSS) metrics for CVE-2025-64344

CVSS metrics for this CVE.

Base score Version Severity Vector Exploitability Impact Score source
7.5 3.1 HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H Click to expand
Attack vector (AV:N)
Could be attacked over the internet or any normal routed network—not just someone sitting at the machine.
Attack complexity (AC:L)
Once they can reach the bug, pulling it off is straightforward—no weird race conditions or rare setup.
Privileges required (PR:N)
No account or special rights needed—anonymous or random user is enough.
User interaction (UI:N)
Nobody has to click “OK” or open a trap file; it can work without a victim helping.
Scope (S:U)
Damage stays in the same “trust bubble” as the broken component—no big spill into unrelated systems.
Confidentiality (C:N)
Doesn’t really leak secrets in a meaningful way.
Integrity (I:N)
Data isn’t meaningfully altered or forged.
Availability (A:H)
Could take the service down hard or make it unusable for people who depend on it.
3.9 3.6 [email protected]

Weakness enumeration for CVE-2025-64344

OS Trackers for CVE-2025-64344

vendor priority summary link
alpine CVE-2025-64344: 1 source package rows (suricata); 16 state rows across 3 repos (3.22-community, 3.23-community, edge-community); fixed 1, open 15. https://security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2025-64344
debian not yet assigned CVE-2025-64344 not yet assigned priority: Debian including 1 source packages (suricata), 4 status rows across 4 suites (bullseye, forky, sid, trixie): resolved 3, open 1. https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2025-64344
redhat high https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-64344
ubuntu medium CVE-2025-64344 medium priority: Ubuntu including 1 source packages (suricata), 7 status rows across 7 suites (bionic, jammy, noble, plucky, questing, upstream, xenial): needs-triage 5, ignored 1, released 1. https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-64344

Affected software / configurations for CVE-2025-64344

Vendor Product Version Raw CPE
oisf suricata < 7.0.13 cpe:2.3:a:oisf:suricata:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
oisf suricata >= 8.0.0, < 8.0.2 cpe:2.3:a:oisf:suricata:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

References for CVE-2025-64344

cvelogic Threat Intelligence