GHSA-96xm-fv9w-pf3f · Severity: medium · Ecosystem: rust — soroban-sdk has overflow in Bytes::slice, Vec::slice, GenRange::gen_range for u64
soroban-sdk is a Rust SDK for Soroban contracts. Arithmetic overflow can be triggered in the `Bytes::slice`, `Vec::slice`, and `Prng::gen_range` (for `u64`) methods in the `soroban-sdk` in versions up to and including `25.0.1`, `23.5.1`, and `25.0.2`. Contracts that pass user-controlled or computed range bounds to `Bytes::slice`, `Vec::slice`, or `Prng::gen_range` may silently operate on incorrect data ranges or generate random numbers from an unintended range, potentially resulting in corrupted contract state. Note that the best practice when using the `soroban-sdk` and building Soroban contracts is to always enable `overflow-checks = true`. The `stellar contract init` tool that prepares the boiler plate for a Soroban contract, as well as all examples and docs, encourage the use of configuring `overflow-checks = true` on `release` profiles so that these arithmetic operations fail rather than silently wrap. Contracts are only impacted if they use `overflow-checks = false` either explicitly or implicitly. It is anticipated the majority of contracts could not be impacted because the best practice encouraged by tooling is to enable `overflow-checks`. The fix available in `25.0.1`, `23.5.1`, and `25.0.2` replaces bare arithmetic with `checked_add` / `checked_sub`, ensuring overflow traps regardless of the `overflow-checks` profile setting. As a workaround, contract workspaces can be configured with a profile available in the GitHub Securtity Advisory to enable overflow checks on the arithmetic operations. This is the best practice when developing Soroban contracts, and the default if using the contract boilerplate generated using `stellar contract init`. Alternatively, contracts can validate range bounds before passing them to `slice` or `gen_range` to ensure the conversions cannot overflow.
Conclusion & alert: CVE-2026-24889 is rated Low Risk (22/100): CVSS Medium severity, with low exploitation likelihood (EPSS 0.01%). Mandatory action: Monitor for updates and reassess as exploit intelligence or EPSS changes.
Risk is dynamic; we continuously reassess and refresh what is shown on this page as upstream context changes.
EPSS lead: Daily EPSS estimates relative likelihood of exploitation; percentile ranks this CVE among scored vulnerabilities (higher = more severe relative rank).
| # | Date | Old EPSS score | New EPSS score | Delta (New - Old) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2026-01-29 | — | 0.01% | — |
Full EPSS history (1 record total)
CVSS metrics for this CVE.
| Base score | Version | Severity | Vector | Exploitability | Impact | Score source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.3 | 3.1 | MEDIUM |
|
3.9 | 1.4 | [email protected] |
GHSA-96xm-fv9w-pf3f · Severity: medium · Ecosystem: rust — soroban-sdk has overflow in Bytes::slice, Vec::slice, GenRange::gen_range for u64
| Vendor | Product | Version | Raw CPE |
|---|---|---|---|
| stellar | rs-soroban-sdk | < 22.0.9 | cpe:2.3:a:stellar:rs-soroban-sdk:*:*:*:*:*:rust:*:* |
| stellar | rs-soroban-sdk | >= 23.0.0, < 23.5.1 | cpe:2.3:a:stellar:rs-soroban-sdk:*:*:*:*:*:rust:*:* |
| stellar | rs-soroban-sdk | >= 25.0.0, < 25.0.2 | cpe:2.3:a:stellar:rs-soroban-sdk:*:*:*:*:*:rust:*:* |
| URL | Tags |
|---|---|
| https://github.com/stellar/rs-soroban-sdk/commit/3890521426d71bb4d892b21f5a283a1e836cfa38 | Patch |
| https://github.com/stellar/rs-soroban-sdk/commit/59fcef437260ed4da42d1efb357137a5c166c02e | Patch |
| https://github.com/stellar/rs-soroban-sdk/commit/c2757c6d774dbb28b34a0b77ffe282e59f0f8462 | Patch |
| https://github.com/stellar/rs-soroban-sdk/pull/1703 | Issue Tracking Patch |
| https://github.com/stellar/rs-soroban-sdk/releases/tag/v22.0.9 | Product Release Notes |
| https://github.com/stellar/rs-soroban-sdk/releases/tag/v23.5.1 | Product Release Notes |
| https://github.com/stellar/rs-soroban-sdk/releases/tag/v25.0.2 | Product Release Notes |
| https://github.com/stellar/rs-soroban-sdk/security/advisories/GHSA-96xm-fv9w-pf3f | Mitigation Vendor Advisory Patch |