CVE-2026-33995 | FreeRDP: Possible double free in kerberos_AcceptSecurityContext

FreeRDP is a free implementation of the Remote Desktop Protocol. Prior to version 3.24.2, a double-free vulnerability in kerberos_AcceptSecurityContext() and kerberos_InitializeSecurityContextA() (WinPR, winpr/libwinpr/sspi/Kerberos/kerberos.c) can cause a crash in any FreeRDP clients on systems where Kerberos and/or Kerberos U2U is configured (Samba AD member, or krb5 for NFS). The crash is triggered during NLA connection teardown and requires a failed authentication attempt. This issue has been patched in version 3.24.2.

Published: 2026-03-30 Last update: 2026-04-01 Assigner: [email protected] Source: [email protected]
NVD Status：Analyzed，CVE State: published
View at NVD, CVE.org, EUVD

CVE-2026-33995 is rated Low Risk (32.3/100): CVSS Medium severity, with low exploitation likelihood (EPSS 0.13%). Monitor for updates and reassess as exploit intelligence or EPSS changes.

Risk is dynamic; we continuously reassess and refresh what is shown on this page as upstream context changes.

Exploit prediction scoring system (EPSS) score for CVE-2026-33995

EPSS lead: Daily EPSS estimates relative likelihood of exploitation; percentile ranks this CVE among scored vulnerabilities (higher = more severe relative rank).

# Date Old EPSS score New EPSS score Delta (New - Old)
1 2026-05-24 0.15% 0.13% -0.03%
2 2026-05-22 0.06% 0.15% +0.10%
3 2026-03-31 — 0.06% —

Full EPSS history (3 records total)

Common vulnerability scoring system (CVSS) metrics for CVE-2026-33995

CVSS metrics for this CVE.

Base score Version Severity Vector Exploitability Impact Score source
5.3 3.1 MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L Click to expand
Attack vector (AV:N)
Could be attacked over the internet or any normal routed network—not just someone sitting at the machine.
Attack complexity (AC:L)
Once they can reach the bug, pulling it off is straightforward—no weird race conditions or rare setup.
Privileges required (PR:N)
No account or special rights needed—anonymous or random user is enough.
User interaction (UI:N)
Nobody has to click “OK” or open a trap file; it can work without a victim helping.
Scope (S:U)
Damage stays in the same “trust bubble” as the broken component—no big spill into unrelated systems.
Confidentiality (C:N)
Doesn’t really leak secrets in a meaningful way.
Integrity (I:N)
Data isn’t meaningfully altered or forged.
Availability (A:L)
Might cause slowdowns, glitches, or partial disruption—not a full brick.
 3.9 1.4 [email protected]

Weakness enumeration for CVE-2026-33995

OS Trackers for CVE-2026-33995

vendor priority summary link
alpine — CVE-2026-33995: 1 source package rows (freerdp); 33 state rows across 2 repos (3.23-community, edge-community); fixed 2, open 31. https://security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2026-33995
debian not yet assigned CVE-2026-33995 not yet assigned priority: Debian including 2 source packages (freerdp2, freerdp3), 5 status rows across 5 suites (bookworm, bullseye, forky, sid, trixie): resolved 3, open 2. https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2026-33995
redhat medium — https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-33995
suse medium CVE-2026-33995 severity moderate: SUSE including 17 source package names (freerdp, freerdp-devel, …), 32 product×package rows across 5 product lines (SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP7, SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP5-LTSS, … (5 product lines)): Known Not Affected 32. https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-33995/
ubuntu medium CVE-2026-33995 medium priority: Ubuntu including 3 source packages (freerdp, freerdp2, freerdp3), 16 status rows across 7 suites (bionic, focal, jammy, noble, questing, upstream, xenial): needs-triage 10, DNE 5, released 1. https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-33995

Affected software / configurations for CVE-2026-33995

Vendor Product Version Raw CPE
freerdp freerdp < 3.24.2 cpe:2.3:a:freerdp:freerdp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

References for CVE-2026-33995

cvelogic Threat Intelligence