Canonical LXD Source Container Identification Vulnerability via cmdline Spoofing in devLXD Server

Description

Impact

In LXD's devLXD server, the source container identification process uses process cmdline (command line) information, allowing attackers to impersonate other containers by spoofing process names.

The core issue lies in the findContainerForPID function in lxd/api_devlxd.go.
This function identifies senders through two steps as shown below:

  1. cmdline-based identification: Check while tracing back through parent processes, and if it starts with [lxc monitor], extract the project name and container name from that process name in the format projectName_containerName.
  2. PID namespace-based identification: If not found in Step 1, check against all containers' PID namespaces.

https://github.com/canonical/lxd/blob/43d5189564d27f6161b430ed258c8b56603c2759/lxd/api_devlxd.go#L166-L276

Attackers can exploit Step 1 processing to impersonate arbitrary containers across projects by spoofing process names.

Reproduction Steps

  1. Access devLXD server from a normal container (e.g., EEEE):
root@EEEE:~# curl --unix-socket /dev/lxd/sock http://lxd-host/1.0/meta-data
instance-id: 9f928574-2561-4eff-af82-a68e57d3c68b
local-hostname: EEEE
  1. Use exec -a to spoof process name and impersonate another container (DDDD):
root@EEEE:~# bash -c "exec -a '[lxc monitor]' curl --unix-socket /dev/lxd/sock http://lxd-host/1.0/meta-data -x 'test-project_DDDD'"
instance-id: 1bb2f1c3-3ad2-4cd6-9965-67b14c3582cc
local-hostname: DDDD

This attack successfully obtains metadata (instance-id, local-hostname) of another container
DDDD from within container EEEE.

Risk

This vulnerability allows attackers to perform the following actions:

  1. Theft of other containers' metadata information
    Obtaining other containers' information via devLXD API's /1.0/meta-data endpoint:
    https://github.com/canonical/lxd/blob/43d5189564d27f6161b430ed258c8b56603c2759/lxd/devlxd.go#L295-L304

  2. Obtaining other containers' configuration information via devLXD API's /1.0/config and /1.0/config/{key} endpoints:
    https://github.com/canonical/lxd/blob/43d5189564d27f6161b430ed258c8b56603c2759/lxd/devlxd.go#L175-L221
    https://github.com/canonical/lxd/blob/43d5189564d27f6161b430ed258c8b56603c2759/lxd/devlxd.go#L228-L267

  3. Obtaining other containers' device information via devLXD API's /1.0/devices endpoint:
    https://github.com/canonical/lxd/blob/43d5189564d27f6161b430ed258c8b56603c2759/lxd/devlxd.go#L377-L395
    Particularly in environments where multiple projects run containers on the same LXD host,
    inter-project information leakage may occur. The attack prerequisite is root privileges within
    any container.

Countermeasures

While containers basically run in separate PID namespaces, based on investigation, the [lxc monitor] process runs in the same PID namespace as the LXD execution process. Therefore, the problem can be resolved by modifying the implementation to use cmdline information only when the PID namespace of the target process matches the PID namespace of the process running LXD.

Patches

LXD Series Status
6 Fixed in LXD 6.5
5.21 Fixed in LXD 5.21.4
5.0 Ignored - Not critical
4.0 Ignored - EOL and not critical

References

Reported by GMO Flatt Security Inc.

Basic information

Type
reviewed
Severity
medium
Advisory on GitHub
Open advisory ↗
Repository advisory
Open repository advisory ↗
Source code
Browse source ↗
Published (advisory)
2025-10-02 21:20:25 UTC
Updated
2025-11-05 22:04:47 UTC
GitHub reviewed
2025-10-02 21:20:25 UTC
NVD published
2025-10-02

EPSS Score

Score Percentile
0.06% 17.05%

CVSS Scores

Base score Version Severity Vector
4.1 3.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N Click to expand
Attack vector (AV:N)
Could be attacked over the internet or any normal routed network—not just someone sitting at the machine.
Attack complexity (AC:L)
Once they can reach the bug, pulling it off is straightforward—no weird race conditions or rare setup.
Privileges required (PR:H)
They need powerful rights—admin, root, or similar—before this pays off.
User interaction (UI:N)
Nobody has to click “OK” or open a trap file; it can work without a victim helping.
Scope (S:C)
Breaking this can reach past the original component and bite other resources—bigger blast radius.
Confidentiality (C:L)
Some sensitive info could get out, but not a total data dump.
Integrity (I:N)
Data isn’t meaningfully altered or forged.
Availability (A:N)
Service keeps running; no real outage angle.
5.1 4.0
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N Click to expand
Attack vector (AV:N)
Could be attacked over the internet or any normal routed network.
Attack complexity (AC:L)
Exploitation conditions are straightforward and stable.
Attack requirements (AT:N)
No additional preconditions are required beyond normal reachability.
Privileges required (PR:H)
High privileges are required.
User interaction (UI:N)
No user interaction is required.
Vulnerable system confidentiality impact (VC:L)
Limited confidentiality impact on the vulnerable system.
Vulnerable system integrity impact (VI:N)
No integrity impact on the vulnerable system.
Vulnerable system availability impact (VA:N)
No availability impact on the vulnerable system.
Subsequent system confidentiality impact (SC:L)
Limited confidentiality impact on subsequent systems.
Subsequent system integrity impact (SI:N)
No integrity impact on subsequent systems.
Subsequent system availability impact (SA:N)
No availability impact on subsequent systems.

Identifiers

CWEs

CWE id Name
CWE-290 Authentication Bypass by Spoofing

Affected packages (3)

Vulnerable version ranges and first patched releases as published by GitHub.

Ecosystem Package Vulnerable range First patched Vulnerable functions
go github.com/canonical/lxd >= 4.0, < 5.21.4 5.21.4
go github.com/canonical/lxd >= 6.0, < 6.5 6.5
go github.com/canonical/lxd >= 0.0.0-20200331193331-03aab09f5b5c, < 0.0.0-20250827065555-0494f5d47e41 0.0.0-20250827065555-0494f5d47e41

References

cvelogic Threat Intelligence