Portainer missing authorization on custom template file endpoint, which exposes template content

Description

Summary

A missing authorization vulnerability in the Custom Template file endpoint (GET /api/custom_templates/{id}/file) allows any authenticated user to read the file content of any custom template by enumerating sequential integer IDs, bypassing Resource Control access restrictions. Template files may contain environment-specific values such as connection strings, API tokens, or registry credentials that administrators would not expect standard users to read.

Severity

Medium

CWE-862 — Missing Authorization

Exploitation requires an authenticated user account and at least one custom template to exist. Template files are returned verbatim and may contain embedded credentials.

Affected Versions

The vulnerability exists in every Portainer release since custom templates were introduced — the customTemplateFile handler has never performed an authorization check.

Fixes are included in the following releases:

Branch First vulnerable Fixed in
2.33.x (LTS) 2.33.0 2.33.8
2.39.x (LTS) 2.39.0 2.39.1

Portainer 2.40.0 and later are not affected — the fix was already on develop when the 2.40.x STS line branched. Portainer LTS branches receive fixes for 6 months plus a 3-month overlap after the next LTS ships. All releases prior to 2.33.0 are end-of-life and will not receive a fix; users on EOL versions should upgrade to a supported release.

Workarounds

There is no runtime configuration that blocks the vulnerable endpoint directly. Administrators who cannot immediately upgrade can reduce exposure by:

  • Avoiding storing secrets in custom templates until the patched release is deployed. Move sensitive configuration values to Portainer environment variables or an external secret store.
  • Reviewing existing custom templates for embedded secrets. Assume any secret previously stored in a custom template on an unpatched instance has been exposed to every authenticated user and rotate accordingly.

Neither replaces the fix.

Affected Code

The customTemplateFile handler in api/http/handler/customtemplates/customtemplate_file.go (lines 30-53) retrieves a custom template by its numeric ID and returns the file content without performing any authorization check.

All other custom template endpoints properly verify access:

Endpoint Method Authorization Check
/api/custom_templates/{id} GET (inspect) userCanEditTemplate() + UserCanAccessResource()
/api/custom_templates/{id} PUT (update) userCanEditTemplate()
/api/custom_templates/{id} DELETE userCanEditTemplate()
/api/custom_templates GET (list) FilterAuthorizedCustomTemplates()
/api/custom_templates/{id}/file GET None

Vulnerable code (customtemplate_file.go:30-53):

func (handler *Handler) customTemplateFile(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) *httperror.HandlerError {
    customTemplateID, _ := request.RetrieveNumericRouteVariableValue(r, "id")
    customTemplate, _ := handler.DataStore.CustomTemplate().Read(portainer.CustomTemplateID(customTemplateID))
    // NO AUTHORIZATION CHECK
    fileContent, _ := handler.FileService.GetFileContent(customTemplate.ProjectPath, entryPath)
    return response.JSON(w, &fileResponse{FileContent: string(fileContent)})
}

Secure reference (customtemplate_inspect.go:50-75):

canEdit := userCanEditTemplate(customTemplate, securityContext)
hasAccess := authorization.UserCanAccessResource(securityContext.UserID, teamIDs, resourceControl)
if !canEdit && !hasAccess {
    return httperror.Forbidden("Access denied to resource", httperrors.ErrResourceAccessDenied)
}

Impact

Any authenticated user (including the lowest-privilege standard user) can read the file content of every custom template in the instance. Custom templates commonly contain Docker Compose configuration, which may include environment-specific secrets such as database connection strings, API tokens, or registry credentials.

Timeline

  • 2026-02-11: Reported via GitHub Security Advisory by duddnr0615k.
  • 2026-03-04: Fix merged to develop and cherry-picked to release/2.39.
  • 2026-03-19: 2.39.1 released with fix.
  • 2026-03-25: 2.40.0 released with fix already present from branch cut.
  • 2026-05-07: 2.33.8 released.

Credit

  • duddnr0615k — identified and reported the missing authorization check on the custom template file endpoint.

Basic information

Type
reviewed
Severity
medium
Advisory on GitHub
Open advisory ↗
Repository advisory
Open repository advisory ↗
Source code
Browse source ↗
Published (advisory)
2026-05-14 16:34:02 UTC
Updated
2026-06-09 10:25:48 UTC
GitHub reviewed
2026-05-14 16:34:02 UTC
NVD published
2026-05-28

EPSS Score

Score Percentile
0.04% 12.47%

CVSS Scores

Base score Version Severity Vector
6.5 3.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N Click to expand
Attack vector (AV:N)
Could be attacked over the internet or any normal routed network—not just someone sitting at the machine.
Attack complexity (AC:L)
Once they can reach the bug, pulling it off is straightforward—no weird race conditions or rare setup.
Privileges required (PR:L)
A normal user session is enough; they don’t have to be admin.
User interaction (UI:N)
Nobody has to click “OK” or open a trap file; it can work without a victim helping.
Scope (S:U)
Damage stays in the same “trust bubble” as the broken component—no big spill into unrelated systems.
Confidentiality (C:H)
Serious risk that confidential data gets exposed in a big way.
Integrity (I:N)
Data isn’t meaningfully altered or forged.
Availability (A:N)
Service keeps running; no real outage angle.
6.0 4.0
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N Click to expand
Attack vector (AV:N)
Could be attacked over the internet or any normal routed network.
Attack complexity (AC:L)
Exploitation conditions are straightforward and stable.
Attack requirements (AT:P)
Additional preconditions must be present for exploitation.
Privileges required (PR:L)
Low privileges are required.
User interaction (UI:N)
No user interaction is required.
Vulnerable system confidentiality impact (VC:H)
High confidentiality impact on the vulnerable system.
Vulnerable system integrity impact (VI:N)
No integrity impact on the vulnerable system.
Vulnerable system availability impact (VA:N)
No availability impact on the vulnerable system.
Subsequent system confidentiality impact (SC:N)
No confidentiality impact on subsequent systems.
Subsequent system integrity impact (SI:N)
No integrity impact on subsequent systems.
Subsequent system availability impact (SA:N)
No availability impact on subsequent systems.

Identifiers

CWEs

CWE id Name
CWE-862 Missing Authorization

Credits

  • duddnr0615k (reporter)

Affected packages (2)

Vulnerable version ranges and first patched releases as published by GitHub.

Ecosystem Package Vulnerable range First patched Vulnerable functions
go github.com/portainer/portainer >= 2.33.0, < 2.33.8 2.33.8
go github.com/portainer/portainer >= 2.39.0, < 2.39.1 2.39.1

References

cvelogic Threat Intelligence