Description
Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Open Source rlottie allows Integer Attacks.
This issue affects rlottie: before 21292665023e5074b38254432716866d00f1985f.
Basic information
- Type
- unreviewed
- Severity
- medium
- Advisory on GitHub
- Open advisory ↗
- Repository advisory
- —
- Source code
- Not specified
- Published (advisory)
- 2026-06-04 12:30:25 UTC
- Updated
- 2026-06-04 12:30:32 UTC
- NVD published
- 2026-06-04
EPSS Score
| Score |
Percentile |
|
0.01%
|
2.18% |
CVSS Scores
| Base score |
Version |
Severity |
Vector |
|
6.1
|
3.1 |
—
|
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H
Click to expand
- Attack vector (AV:L)
- They already need access on the box, or another person has to do something wrong; it’s not a remote drive-by.
- Attack complexity (AC:L)
- Once they can reach the bug, pulling it off is straightforward—no weird race conditions or rare setup.
- Privileges required (PR:N)
- No account or special rights needed—anonymous or random user is enough.
- User interaction (UI:R)
- A real person has to do something—click, install, enable—otherwise it doesn’t land.
- Scope (S:U)
- Damage stays in the same “trust bubble” as the broken component—no big spill into unrelated systems.
- Confidentiality (C:N)
- Doesn’t really leak secrets in a meaningful way.
- Integrity (I:L)
- Attackers could change some data, but it’s limited—not everything goes.
- Availability (A:H)
- Could take the service down hard or make it unusable for people who depend on it.
|
CWEs
| CWE id |
Name |
|
CWE-190
|
Integer Overflow or Wraparound |
cvelogic
Threat Intelligence