Canonical LXD Arbitrary File Read via Template Injection in Snapshot Patterns

Description

Impact

In LXD's instance snapshot creation functionality, the Pongo2 template engine is used in the snapshots.pattern configuration for generating snapshot names. While code execution functionality has not been found in this template engine, it has file reading capabilities, creating a vulnerability that allows arbitrary file reading through template injection attacks.

Reproduction Steps

  1. Log in to LXD-UI with an account that has permissions to modify instance settings
  2. Set the following template injection payload in the instance snapshot pattern:
{% filter urlencode|slice:":100" %}{% include "/etc/passwd" %}{%endfilter %}

Note that the above template uses the Pongo2 template engine's include tag to read system files. It also uses urlencode and slice filters to bypass character count and type restrictions.

  1. Set scheduled snapshots to run every minute and wait for snapshot generation
  2. Wait about a minute and confirm that file contents can be obtained from the created snapshot name

Risk

The attack requires having configuration change permissions for LXD instances.
The attack allows reading arbitrary files accessible with LXD process permissions. This could lead to leakage of the following information:
-​ LXD host configuration files (/etc/passwd, /etc/shadow, etc.)
-​ LXD database files (containing information about all projects and instances)
-​ Configuration files and data of other instances
-​ Sensitive information on the host system

Countermeasures

Pongo2 provides mechanisms for sandboxing templates.

> Template sandboxing (directory patterns, banned tags/filters)
( https://github.com/flosch/pongo2/tree/master?tab=readme-ov-file#features )

This functionality allows banning specific tags and filters by generating a custom TemplateSet.

At minimum, the following tags are considered to pose a risk of file leakage on the LXD host when used. Therefore, banning these can provide countermeasures against file reading attacks.
-​ include
-​ ssi
-​ extends
-​ import

The deny-list approach is prone to vulnerability recurrence due to missed countermeasures or new feature additions. Therefore, as the safest approach, we recommend using an allow-list format to permit only necessary functions.

However, as far as our investigation shows, pongo2 does not have functionality to retrieve a list of registered tags or filters, nor does it provide means to implement an allow-list approach. Therefore, it is necessary to either forcibly obtain the registration list through reflection and ban anything not on the allow-list, or ban everything from the current implemented list since the library has not been updated for about two years.

In LXD's implementation, template injection attacks can be prevented by modifying the RenderTemplate function in shared/util.go to use a restricted TemplateSet as shown above.

Patches

LXD Series Status
6 Fixed in LXD 6.5
5.21 Fixed in LXD 5.21.4
5.0 Ignored - Not critical
4.0 Ignored - EOL and not critical

References

Reported by GMO Flatt Security Inc.

Basic information

Type
reviewed
Severity
high
Advisory on GitHub
Open advisory ↗
Repository advisory
Open repository advisory ↗
Source code
Browse source ↗
Published (advisory)
2025-10-02 21:21:33 UTC
Updated
2026-01-16 22:03:02 UTC
GitHub reviewed
2025-10-02 21:21:33 UTC
NVD published
2025-10-02

EPSS Score

Score Percentile
0.06% 19.32%

CVSS Scores

Base score Version Severity Vector
6.5 3.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N Click to expand
Attack vector (AV:N)
Could be attacked over the internet or any normal routed network—not just someone sitting at the machine.
Attack complexity (AC:L)
Once they can reach the bug, pulling it off is straightforward—no weird race conditions or rare setup.
Privileges required (PR:L)
A normal user session is enough; they don’t have to be admin.
User interaction (UI:N)
Nobody has to click “OK” or open a trap file; it can work without a victim helping.
Scope (S:U)
Damage stays in the same “trust bubble” as the broken component—no big spill into unrelated systems.
Confidentiality (C:H)
Serious risk that confidential data gets exposed in a big way.
Integrity (I:N)
Data isn’t meaningfully altered or forged.
Availability (A:N)
Service keeps running; no real outage angle.
7.1 4.0
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N Click to expand
Attack vector (AV:N)
Could be attacked over the internet or any normal routed network.
Attack complexity (AC:L)
Exploitation conditions are straightforward and stable.
Attack requirements (AT:N)
No additional preconditions are required beyond normal reachability.
Privileges required (PR:L)
Low privileges are required.
User interaction (UI:N)
No user interaction is required.
Vulnerable system confidentiality impact (VC:H)
High confidentiality impact on the vulnerable system.
Vulnerable system integrity impact (VI:N)
No integrity impact on the vulnerable system.
Vulnerable system availability impact (VA:N)
No availability impact on the vulnerable system.
Subsequent system confidentiality impact (SC:N)
No confidentiality impact on subsequent systems.
Subsequent system integrity impact (SI:N)
No integrity impact on subsequent systems.
Subsequent system availability impact (SA:N)
No availability impact on subsequent systems.

Identifiers

CWEs

CWE id Name
CWE-1336 Improper Neutralization of Special Elements Used in a Template Engine

Affected packages (3)

Vulnerable version ranges and first patched releases as published by GitHub.

Ecosystem Package Vulnerable range First patched Vulnerable functions
go github.com/lxc/lxd >= 0.0.0-20200331193331-03aab09f5b5c, < 0.0.0-20250827065555-0494f5d47e41 0.0.0-20250827065555-0494f5d47e41
go github.com/lxc/lxd >= 4.0.0, < 5.21.4 5.21.4
go github.com/lxc/lxd >= 6.0.0, < 6.5.0 6.5.0

References

cvelogic Threat Intelligence