Integer overflow in the process_envvars function in elf/rtld.c in glibc before 2.5-rc4 might allow local users to execute arbitrary code via a large LD_HWCAP_MASK environment variable value. NOTE: the glibc maintainers state that they do not believe that this issue is exploitable for code execution
総合評価: CVE-2007-3508 は中リスク(41.7/100)。CVSS 深刻度は高。悪用される可能性が高い(EPSS 0.45%、36 パーセンタイル) 推奨対応: 影響資産を整理し、修補計画に組み込んでください。
リスクは変動します。再評価に基づき、本ページの表示内容を更新しています。
EPSS は日次で悪用されやすさの相対度合いを推定します。パーセンタイルは採点済み CVE の中での相対位置(高いほど相対的に深刻)を示します。
| # | 日付 | 旧 EPSS スコア | 新 EPSS スコア | Δ(新 − 旧) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2026-06-15 | 0.05% | 0.45% | +0.40% |
| 2 | 2026-02-20 | 0.05% | 0.05% | +0.00% |
| 3 | 2025-03-30 | — | 0.05% | — |
EPSS の全履歴 (全 8 件)
この CVE の CVSS 指標。
| ベーススコア | バージョン | 深刻度 | ベクトル | 悪用しやすさ | 影響 | スコアの出典 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.2 | 2.0 | HIGH |
|
3.9 | 10.0 | [email protected] |
| vendor | priority | summary | link |
|---|---|---|---|
alpine
|
— | CVE-2007-3508: no source package rows; 0 state rows across 0 repos (none); fixed 0, open 0. | https://security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2007-3508 |
debian
|
unimportant | CVE-2007-3508 unimportant priority: Debian including 1 source packages (glibc), 5 status rows across 5 suites (bookworm, bullseye, forky, sid, trixie): resolved 5. | https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2007-3508 |
gentoo
|
normal | CVE-2007-3508: 1 GLSA(s) (200707-04), 1 atom(s) (sys-libs/glibc); latest impact normal. | https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=CVE-2007-3508 |
redhat
|
— | — | https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2007-3508 |
ubuntu
|
negligible | CVE-2007-3508 negligible priority: Ubuntu including 1 source packages (glibc), 8 status rows across 8 suites (dapper, edgy, feisty, gutsy, hardy, intrepid, jaunty, upstream): ignored 3, not-affected 3, released 2. | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2007-3508 |
Based on the analysis of Red Hat and several Glibc developers, Mandriva does not believe this to be exploitable.
After careful analysis by Red Hat and several Glibc developers, it has been determined that this bug is not exploitable. For more information please see Red Hat Bugzilla bug #247208 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247208