CVE-2022-3602 | X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow

A buffer overrun can be triggered in X.509 certificate verification, specifically in name constraint checking. Note that this occurs after certificate chain signature verification and requires either a CA to have signed the malicious certificate or for the application to continue certificate verification despite failure to construct a path to a trusted issuer. An attacker can craft a malicious email address to overflow four attacker-controlled bytes on the stack. This buffer overflow could result in a crash (causing a denial of service) or potentially remote code execution. Many platforms implement stack overflow protections which would mitigate against the risk of remote code execution. The risk may be further mitigated based on stack layout for any given platform/compiler. Pre-announcements of CVE-2022-3602 described this issue as CRITICAL. Further analysis based on some of the mitigating factors described above have led this to be downgraded to HIGH. Users are still encouraged to upgrade to a new version as soon as possible. In a TLS client, this can be triggered by connecting to a malicious server. In a TLS server, this can be triggered if the server requests client authentication and a malicious client connects. Fixed in OpenSSL 3.0.7 (Affected 3.0.0,3.0.1,3.0.2,3.0.3,3.0.4,3.0.5,3.0.6).

公開: 2022-11-01 最終更新: 2026-06-17 Assigner: [email protected] ソース: [email protected]

総合評価: CVE-2022-3602 は高リスク(65.9/100)。CVSS 深刻度は高。悪用される可能性が高い(EPSS 90.77%、100 パーセンタイル) 根拠: EPSS 上、短期間での悪用可能性は高い水準です。 推奨対応: 悪用可能性が高いため、影響範囲の確認と修補の優先付けを推奨します。

リスクは変動します。再評価に基づき、本ページの表示内容を更新しています。

CVE-2022-3602 の EPSS(Exploit Prediction Scoring System)スコア

EPSS は日次で悪用されやすさの相対度合いを推定します。パーセンタイルは採点済み CVE の中での相対位置(高いほど相対的に深刻)を示します。

# 日付 旧 EPSS スコア 新 EPSS スコア Δ(新 − 旧)
1 2026-07-06 89.80% 90.77% +0.97%
2 2026-06-15 83.51% 89.80% +6.30%
3 2026-05-05 83.51%

EPSS の全履歴 (全 97 件)

CVE-2022-3602 の CVSS(Common Vulnerability Scoring System)指標

この CVE の CVSS 指標。

ベーススコア バージョン 深刻度 ベクトル 悪用しやすさ 影響 スコアの出典
7.5 3.1 HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H クリックして展開
攻撃ベクター (AV:N)
インターネットなど、ルーティングされたネットワーク越しに遠隔から悪用しうる。端末の前にいる必要はない。
攻撃の複雑さ (AC:L)
攻撃者が条件を満たせば、レース条件や珍しい構成に依存せずに再現しやすい。
必要な権限 (PR:N)
事前のログインや昇格は不要で、匿名アクセスのまま踏み台にしうる。
ユーザーの関与 (UI:N)
メールのリンクを開く、マクロを有効にするなど、被害者の協力がなくても成立しうる。
スコープ (S:U)
影響は脆弱コンポーネントと同一のセキュリティ権限・信頼境界の内側に収まる。
機密性への影響 (C:N)
機微情報の漏えいは想定しにくい。
完全性への影響 (I:N)
改ざん・なりすましによる信頼毀損は軽微か、想定されない。
可用性への影響 (A:H)
長時間のサービス停止、データ損壊による復旧不能に近い状態など、利用者に著しい不便を与えうる。
3.9 3.6 [email protected]
7.5 3.1 HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H クリックして展開
攻撃ベクター (AV:N)
インターネットなど、ルーティングされたネットワーク越しに遠隔から悪用しうる。端末の前にいる必要はない。
攻撃の複雑さ (AC:L)
攻撃者が条件を満たせば、レース条件や珍しい構成に依存せずに再現しやすい。
必要な権限 (PR:N)
事前のログインや昇格は不要で、匿名アクセスのまま踏み台にしうる。
ユーザーの関与 (UI:N)
メールのリンクを開く、マクロを有効にするなど、被害者の協力がなくても成立しうる。
スコープ (S:U)
影響は脆弱コンポーネントと同一のセキュリティ権限・信頼境界の内側に収まる。
機密性への影響 (C:N)
機微情報の漏えいは想定しにくい。
完全性への影響 (I:N)
改ざん・なりすましによる信頼毀損は軽微か、想定されない。
可用性への影響 (A:H)
長時間のサービス停止、データ損壊による復旧不能に近い状態など、利用者に著しい不便を与えうる。
3.9 3.6 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0

CVE-2022-3602 の弱点分類(列挙)

CVE-2022-3602 の GitHub Security Advisory

GHSA-8rwr-x37p-mx23 · 深刻度: critical · エコシステム: rust — X.509 Email Address 4-byte Buffer Overflow

CVE-2022-3602 の OS トラッカー

vendor priority summary link
alpine CVE-2022-3602: 2 source package rows (nodejs, openssl); 39 state rows across 7 repos (3.17-main, 3.18-main, 3.19-main, 3.20-main, 3.21-main, 3.22-main, edge-main); fixed 14, open 25. https://security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2022-3602
debian unimportant CVE-2022-3602 unimportant priority: Debian including 1 source packages (openssl), 5 status rows across 5 suites (bookworm, bullseye, forky, sid, trixie): resolved 5. https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2022-3602
gentoo low CVE-2022-3602: 2 GLSA(s) (202211-01, 202405-29), 2 atom(s) (dev-libs/openssl, net-libs/nodejs); latest impact low. https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?quicksearch=CVE-2022-3602
redhat high https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-3602
suse high CVE-2022-3602 severity important: SUSE including 94 source package names (cargo-audit-advisory-db-20221102-1.1, cargo-audit-advisory-db-20250304-160000.2.2, …), 390 product×package rows across 55 product lines (SUSE CaaS Platform 4.0, SUSE Enterprise Storage 6, … (55 product lines)): Known Not Affected 314, Fixed 76. https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-3602/
ubuntu high CVE-2022-3602 high priority: Ubuntu including 4 source packages (edk2, nodejs, openssl, openssl1.0), 45 status rows across 13 suites (bionic, focal, jammy, kinetic, lunar, mantic, noble, oracular, plucky, questing, trusty, upstream, xenial): not-affected 28, released 9, DNE 4, needs-triage 3, ignored 1. https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2022-3602

CVE-2022-3602 の影響を受けるソフトウェア/構成

ベンダー 製品 バージョン 生の CPE
openssl openssl >= 3.0.0, < 3.0.7 cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
fedoraproject fedora 36 cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora:36:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
fedoraproject fedora 37 cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora:37:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
netapp clustered_data_ontap cpe:2.3:a:netapp:clustered_data_ontap:-:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
fedoraproject fedora 26 cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora:26:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
fedoraproject fedora 27 cpe:2.3:o:fedoraproject:fedora:27:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
nodejs node.js >= 18.0.0, < 18.11.0 cpe:2.3:a:nodejs:node.js:*:*:*:*:-:*:*:*
nodejs node.js 18.12.0 cpe:2.3:a:nodejs:node.js:18.12.0:*:*:*:lts:*:*:*
nodejs node.js 19.0.0 cpe:2.3:a:nodejs:node.js:19.0.0:*:*:*:-:*:*:*

CVE-2022-3602 の参考情報

URL タグ
http://packetstormsecurity.com/files/169687/OpenSSL-Security-Advisory-20221101.html Third Party Advisory VDB Entry
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/01/15 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/01/16 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/01/17 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/01/18 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/01/19 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/01/20 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/01/21 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/01/24 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/1 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/10 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/11 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/12 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/13 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/14 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/15 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/2 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/3 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/5 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/6 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/7 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/02/9 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/03/1 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/03/10 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/03/11 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/03/2 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/03/3 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/03/5 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/03/6 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/03/7 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
http://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2022/11/03/9 Mailing List Third Party Advisory
https://git.openssl.org/gitweb/?p=openssl.git%3Ba=commitdiff%3Bh=fe3b639dc19b325846f4f6801f2f4604f56e3de3 Broken Link Third Party Advisory
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/63YRPWPUSX3MBHNPIEJZDKQT6YA7UF6S/ Mailing List Third Party Advisory
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-announce%40lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DWP23EZYOBDJQP7HP4YU7W2ABU2YDITS/ Mailing List Third Party Advisory
https://psirt.global.sonicwall.com/vuln-detail/SNWLID-2022-0023 Third Party Advisory
https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/202211-01 Issue Tracking Third Party Advisory
https://security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20221102-0001/ Third Party Advisory
https://tools.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-openssl-W9sdCc2a Third Party Advisory
https://www.kb.cert.org/vuls/id/794340 Third Party Advisory US Government Resource
https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20221101.txt Vendor Advisory
https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/security-center/advisory/intel-sa-00789.html
https://cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-408105.html
cvelogic Threat Intelligence