In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/gup: fix FOLL_FORCE COW security issue and remove FOLL_COW Ever since the Dirty COW (CVE-2016-5195) security issue happened, we know that FOLL_FORCE can be possibly dangerous, especially if there are races that can be exploited by user space. Right now, it would be sufficient to have some code that sets a PTE of a R/O-mapped shared page dirty, in order for it to erroneously become writable by FOLL_FORCE. The implications of setting a write-protected PTE dirty might not be immediately obvious to everyone. And in fact ever since commit 9ae0f87d009c ("mm/shmem: unconditionally set pte dirty in mfill_atomic_install_pte"), we can use UFFDIO_CONTINUE to map a shmem page R/O while marking the pte dirty. This can be used by unprivileged user space to modify tmpfs/shmem file content even if the user does not have write permissions to the file, and to bypass memfd write sealing -- Dirty COW restricted to tmpfs/shmem (CVE-2022-2590). To fix such security issues for good, the insight is that we really only need that fancy retry logic (FOLL_COW) for COW mappings that are not writable (!VM_WRITE). And in a COW mapping, we really only broke COW if we have an exclusive anonymous page mapped. If we have something else mapped, or the mapped anonymous page might be shared (!PageAnonExclusive), we have to trigger a write fault to break COW. If we don't find an exclusive anonymous page when we retry, we have to trigger COW breaking once again because something intervened. Let's move away from this mandatory-retry + dirty handling and rely on our PageAnonExclusive() flag for making a similar decision, to use the same COW logic as in other kernel parts here as well. In case we stumble over a PTE in a COW mapping that does not map an exclusive anonymous page, COW was not properly broken and we have to trigger a fake write-fault to break COW. Just like we do in can_change_pte_writable() added via commit 64fe24a3e05e ("mm/mprotect: try avoiding write faults for exclusive anonymous pages when changing protection") and commit 76aefad628aa ("mm/mprotect: fix soft-dirty check in can_change_pte_writable()"), take care of softdirty and uffd-wp manually. For example, a write() via /proc/self/mem to a uffd-wp-protected range has to fail instead of silently granting write access and bypassing the userspace fault handler. Note that FOLL_FORCE is not only used for debug access, but also triggered by applications without debug intentions, for example, when pinning pages via RDMA. This fixes CVE-2022-2590. Note that only x86_64 and aarch64 are affected, because only those support CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_USERFAULTFD_MINOR. Fortunately, FOLL_COW is no longer required to handle FOLL_FORCE. So let's just get rid of it. Thanks to Nadav Amit for pointing out that the pte_dirty() check in FOLL_FORCE code is problematic and might be exploitable. Note 1: We don't check for the PTE being dirty because it doesn't matter for making a "was COWed" decision anymore, and whoever modifies the page has to set the page dirty either way. Note 2: Kernels before extended uffd-wp support and before PageAnonExclusive (< 5.19) can simply revert the problematic commit instead and be safe regarding UFFDIO_CONTINUE. A backport to v5.19 requires minor adjustments due to lack of vma_soft_dirty_enabled().
総合評価: CVE-2022-50014 は低リスク(35/100)。CVSS 深刻度は高。悪用される可能性が高い(EPSS 0.06%、20 パーセンタイル) 推奨対応: 悪用情報と EPSS の推移を監視し、必要に応じて優先度を見直してください。
リスクは変動します。再評価に基づき、本ページの表示内容を更新しています。
EPSS は日次で悪用されやすさの相対度合いを推定します。パーセンタイルは採点済み CVE の中での相対位置(高いほど相対的に深刻)を示します。
| # | 日付 | 旧 EPSS スコア | 新 EPSS スコア | Δ(新 − 旧) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2026-04-14 | 0.02% | 0.06% | +0.05% |
| 2 | 2025-06-18 | — | 0.02% | — |
EPSS の全履歴 (全 2 件)
この CVE の CVSS 指標。
| ベーススコア | バージョン | 深刻度 | ベクトル | 悪用しやすさ | 影響 | スコアの出典 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.0 | 3.1 | HIGH |
|
1.0 | 5.9 | [email protected] |
| vendor | priority | summary | link |
|---|---|---|---|
debian
|
unimportant | CVE-2022-50014 unimportant priority: Debian including 1 source packages (linux), 5 status rows across 5 suites (bookworm, bullseye, forky, sid, trixie): resolved 5. | https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2022-50014 |
redhat
|
medium | — | https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-50014 |
suse
|
medium | CVE-2022-50014 severity moderate: SUSE including 53 source package names (bpftool-7.0.0-284.11.1.el9_2, cluster-md-kmp-default, …), 293 product×package rows across 53 product lines (SLES-LTSS-TERADATA 15 SP2, SUSE Liberty Linux 9, … (53 product lines)): Known Not Affected 266, Fixed 27. | https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-50014/ |
ubuntu
|
medium | CVE-2022-50014 medium priority: Ubuntu including 144 source packages (linux, linux-allwinner-5.19, …), 1288 status rows across 9 suites (bionic, focal, jammy, noble, oracular, plucky, trusty, upstream, xenial): DNE 924, ignored 147, not-affected 139, released 78. | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2022-50014 |
| ベンダー | 製品 | バージョン | 生の CPE |
|---|---|---|---|
| linux | linux_kernel | >= 5.16, < 5.19.6 | cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.0 | cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.0:rc1:*:*:*:*:*:* |
| linux | linux_kernel | 6.0 | cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:6.0:rc2:*:*:*:*:*:* |