CVE-2025-68356 | gfs2: Prevent recursive memory reclaim

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: gfs2: Prevent recursive memory reclaim Function new_inode() returns a new inode with inode->i_mapping->gfp_mask set to GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE. This value includes the __GFP_FS flag, so allocations in that address space can recurse into filesystem memory reclaim. We don't want that to happen because it can consume a significant amount of stack memory. Worse than that is that it can also deadlock: for example, in several places, gfs2_unstuff_dinode() is called inside filesystem transactions. This calls filemap_grab_folio(), which can allocate a new folio, which can trigger memory reclaim. If memory reclaim recurses into the filesystem and starts another transaction, a deadlock will ensue. To fix these kinds of problems, prevent memory reclaim from recursing into filesystem code by making sure that the gfp_mask of inode address spaces doesn't include __GFP_FS. The "meta" and resource group address spaces were already using GFP_NOFS as their gfp_mask (which doesn't include __GFP_FS). The default value of GFP_HIGHUSER_MOVABLE is less restrictive than GFP_NOFS, though. To avoid being overly limiting, use the default value and only knock off the __GFP_FS flag. I'm not sure if this will actually make a difference, but it also shouldn't hurt. This patch is loosely based on commit ad22c7a043c2 ("xfs: prevent stack overflows from page cache allocation"). Fixes xfstest generic/273.

公開: 2025-12-24 最終更新: 2026-04-15 Assigner: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 ソース: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67

総合評価: CVE-2025-68356 は低リスク(3.7/100)。悪用される可能性が高い(EPSS 0.02%、4 パーセンタイル) 推奨対応: 総合リスクは低く緊急対応は不要です。通常の保守サイクルでパッチを適用し、CVSS / EPSS が上昇したら優先度を見直してください。

リスクは変動します。再評価に基づき、本ページの表示内容を更新しています。

CVE-2025-68356 の EPSS(Exploit Prediction Scoring System)スコア

EPSS は日次で悪用されやすさの相対度合いを推定します。パーセンタイルは採点済み CVE の中での相対位置(高いほど相対的に深刻)を示します。

# 日付 旧 EPSS スコア 新 EPSS スコア Δ(新 − 旧)
1 2025-12-24 0.02%

EPSS の全履歴 (全 1 件)

CVE-2025-68356 の CVSS(Common Vulnerability Scoring System)指標

この CVE の CVSS 指標。

この CVE のデータセットに CVSS はありません。

CVE-2025-68356 の弱点分類(列挙)

CVE-2025-68356 の OS トラッカー

vendor priority summary link
debian unimportant CVE-2025-68356 unimportant priority: Debian including 1 source packages (linux), 5 status rows across 5 suites (bookworm, bullseye, forky, sid, trixie): resolved 5. https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2025-68356
redhat medium https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-68356
suse medium CVE-2025-68356 severity moderate: SUSE including 116 source package names (13.2-9.1:libsqlite3-0-3.49.1-1.1, 2.1.3-6.31:libsqlite3-0-3.49.1-1.1, …), 493 product×package rows across 83 product lines (Container suse/sl-micro/6.0/baremetal-os-container, Container suse/sl-micro/6.0/base-os-container, … (83 product lines)): Known Not Affected 297, Fixed 171, First Fixed 25. https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-68356/
ubuntu medium CVE-2025-68356 medium priority: Ubuntu including 157 source packages (linux, linux-allwinner-5.19, …), 1405 status rows across 9 suites (bionic, focal, jammy, noble, plucky, questing, trusty, upstream, xenial): DNE 1010, ignored 179, released 99, not-affected 79, needed 38. https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-68356

CVE-2025-68356 の影響を受けるソフトウェア/構成

ベンダー 製品 バージョン 生の CPE
データセットに影響を受ける製品はありません。

CVE-2025-68356 の参考情報

cvelogic Threat Intelligence