In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: btrfs: fix double free of qgroup record after failure to add delayed ref head In the previous code it was possible to incur into a double kfree() scenario when calling add_delayed_ref_head(). This could happen if the record was reported to already exist in the btrfs_qgroup_trace_extent_nolock() call, but then there was an error later on add_delayed_ref_head(). In this case, since add_delayed_ref_head() returned an error, the caller went to free the record. Since add_delayed_ref_head() couldn't set this kfree'd pointer to NULL, then kfree() would have acted on a non-NULL 'record' object which was pointing to memory already freed by the callee. The problem comes from the fact that the responsibility to kfree the object is on both the caller and the callee at the same time. Hence, the fix for this is to shift the ownership of the 'qrecord' object out of the add_delayed_ref_head(). That is, we will never attempt to kfree() the given object inside of this function, and will expect the caller to act on the 'qrecord' object on its own. The only exception where the 'qrecord' object cannot be kfree'd is if it was inserted into the tracing logic, for which we already have the 'qrecord_inserted_ret' boolean to account for this. Hence, the caller has to kfree the object only if add_delayed_ref_head() reports not to have inserted it on the tracing logic. As a side-effect of the above, we must guarantee that 'qrecord_inserted_ret' is properly initialized at the start of the function, not at the end, and then set when an actual insert happens. This way we avoid 'qrecord_inserted_ret' having an invalid value on an early exit. The documentation from the add_delayed_ref_head() has also been updated to reflect on the exact ownership of the 'qrecord' object.
総合評価: CVE-2025-68359 は低リスク(3.1/100)。悪用される可能性が高い(EPSS 0.02%、3 パーセンタイル) 推奨対応: 総合リスクは低く緊急対応は不要です。通常の保守サイクルでパッチを適用し、CVSS / EPSS が上昇したら優先度を見直してください。
リスクは変動します。再評価に基づき、本ページの表示内容を更新しています。
EPSS は日次で悪用されやすさの相対度合いを推定します。パーセンタイルは採点済み CVE の中での相対位置(高いほど相対的に深刻)を示します。
| # | 日付 | 旧 EPSS スコア | 新 EPSS スコア | Δ(新 − 旧) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025-12-24 | — | 0.02% | — |
EPSS の全履歴 (全 1 件)
この CVE の CVSS 指標。
この CVE のデータセットに CVSS はありません。
| vendor | priority | summary | link |
|---|---|---|---|
debian
|
unimportant | CVE-2025-68359 unimportant priority: Debian including 1 source packages (linux), 5 status rows across 5 suites (bookworm, bullseye, forky, sid, trixie): resolved 4, open 1. | https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2025-68359 |
redhat
|
low | — | https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-68359 |
suse
|
medium | CVE-2025-68359 severity moderate: SUSE including 116 source package names (13.2-9.1:libsqlite3-0-3.49.1-1.1, 2.1.3-6.31:libsqlite3-0-3.49.1-1.1, …), 493 product×package rows across 83 product lines (Container suse/sl-micro/6.0/baremetal-os-container, Container suse/sl-micro/6.0/base-os-container, … (83 product lines)): Known Not Affected 297, Fixed 171, First Fixed 25. | https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-68359/ |
ubuntu
|
medium | CVE-2025-68359 medium priority: Ubuntu including 157 source packages (linux, linux-allwinner-5.19, …), 1405 status rows across 9 suites (bionic, focal, jammy, noble, plucky, questing, trusty, upstream, xenial): DNE 1010, ignored 179, not-affected 112, released 99, needed 5. | https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-68359 |
| ベンダー | 製品 | バージョン | 生の CPE |
|---|---|---|---|
| データセットに影響を受ける製品はありません。 | |||