CVE-2025-68807 | block: fix race between wbt_enable_default and IO submission

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: block: fix race between wbt_enable_default and IO submission When wbt_enable_default() is moved out of queue freezing in elevator_change(), it can cause the wbt inflight counter to become negative (-1), leading to hung tasks in the writeback path. Tasks get stuck in wbt_wait() because the counter is in an inconsistent state. The issue occurs because wbt_enable_default() could race with IO submission, allowing the counter to be decremented before proper initialization. This manifests as: rq_wait[0]: inflight: -1 has_waiters: True rwb_enabled() checks the state, which can be updated exactly between wbt_wait() (rq_qos_throttle()) and wbt_track()(rq_qos_track()), then the inflight counter will become negative. And results in hung task warnings like: task:kworker/u24:39 state:D stack:0 pid:14767 Call Trace: rq_qos_wait+0xb4/0x150 wbt_wait+0xa9/0x100 __rq_qos_throttle+0x24/0x40 blk_mq_submit_bio+0x672/0x7b0 ... Fix this by: 1. Splitting wbt_enable_default() into: - __wbt_enable_default(): Returns true if wbt_init() should be called - wbt_enable_default(): Wrapper for existing callers (no init) - wbt_init_enable_default(): New function that checks and inits WBT 2. Using wbt_init_enable_default() in blk_register_queue() to ensure proper initialization during queue registration 3. Move wbt_init() out of wbt_enable_default() which is only for enabling disabled wbt from bfq and iocost, and wbt_init() isn't needed. Then the original lock warning can be avoided. 4. Removing the ELEVATOR_FLAG_ENABLE_WBT_ON_EXIT flag and its handling code since it's no longer needed This ensures WBT is properly initialized before any IO can be submitted, preventing the counter from going negative.

公開: 2026-01-13 最終更新: 2026-06-17 Assigner: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67 ソース: 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67

総合評価: CVE-2025-68807 は低リスク(5.2/100)。悪用される可能性が高い(EPSS 0.15%、5 パーセンタイル) 推奨対応: 総合リスクは低く緊急対応は不要です。通常の保守サイクルでパッチを適用し、CVSS / EPSS が上昇したら優先度を見直してください。

リスクは変動します。再評価に基づき、本ページの表示内容を更新しています。

CVE-2025-68807 の EPSS(Exploit Prediction Scoring System)スコア

EPSS は日次で悪用されやすさの相対度合いを推定します。パーセンタイルは採点済み CVE の中での相対位置(高いほど相対的に深刻)を示します。

# 日付 旧 EPSS スコア 新 EPSS スコア Δ(新 − 旧)
1 2026-06-15 0.02% 0.15% +0.14%
2 2026-01-14 0.02%

EPSS の全履歴 (全 2 件)

CVE-2025-68807 の CVSS(Common Vulnerability Scoring System)指標

この CVE の CVSS 指標。

この CVE のデータセットに CVSS はありません。

CVE-2025-68807 の弱点分類(列挙)

CVE-2025-68807 の OS トラッカー

vendor priority summary link
debian unimportant CVE-2025-68807 unimportant priority: Debian including 1 source packages (linux), 5 status rows across 5 suites (bookworm, bullseye, forky, sid, trixie): resolved 5. https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2025-68807
redhat low https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-68807
suse medium CVE-2025-68807 severity moderate: SUSE including 23 source package names (cluster-md-kmp-default, dlm-kmp-default, …), 220 product×package rows across 42 product lines (SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 15 SP7, SUSE Linux Enterprise High Availability Extension 16.0, … (42 product lines)): Known Not Affected 220. https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-68807/
ubuntu medium CVE-2025-68807 medium priority: Ubuntu including 157 source packages (linux, linux-allwinner-5.19, …), 1405 status rows across 9 suites (bionic, focal, jammy, noble, plucky, questing, trusty, upstream, xenial): DNE 1010, ignored 174, not-affected 120, released 88, pending 11, needed 2. https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-68807

CVE-2025-68807 の影響を受けるソフトウェア/構成

ベンダー 製品 バージョン 生の CPE
linux linux_kernel >= 6.16, < 6.18.3 cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
linux linux_kernel >= 6.16, < 6.19 cpe:2.3:o:linux:linux_kernel:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

CVE-2025-68807 の参考情報

cvelogic Threat Intelligence