CVE-2026-2673 | OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server may choose unexpected key agreement group

Issue summary: An OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server may fail to negotiate the expected preferred key exchange group when its key exchange group configuration includes the default by using the 'DEFAULT' keyword. Impact summary: A less preferred key exchange may be used even when a more preferred group is supported by both client and server, if the group was not included among the client's initial predicated keyshares. This will sometimes be the case with the new hybrid post-quantum groups, if the client chooses to defer their use until specifically requested by the server. If an OpenSSL TLS 1.3 server's configuration uses the 'DEFAULT' keyword to interpolate the built-in default group list into its own configuration, perhaps adding or removing specific elements, then an implementation defect causes the 'DEFAULT' list to lose its 'tuple' structure, and all server-supported groups were treated as a single sufficiently secure 'tuple', with the server not sending a Hello Retry Request (HRR) even when a group in a more preferred tuple was mutually supported. As a result, the client and server might fail to negotiate a mutually supported post-quantum key agreement group, such as 'X25519MLKEM768', if the client's configuration results in only 'classical' groups (such as 'X25519' being the only ones in the client's initial keyshare prediction). OpenSSL 3.5 and later support a new syntax for selecting the most preferred TLS 1.3 key agreement group on TLS servers. The old syntax had a single 'flat' list of groups, and treated all the supported groups as sufficiently secure. If any of the keyshares predicted by the client were supported by the server the most preferred among these was selected, even if other groups supported by the client, but not included in the list of predicted keyshares would have been more preferred, if included. The new syntax partitions the groups into distinct 'tuples' of roughly equivalent security. Within each tuple the most preferred group included among the client's predicted keyshares is chosen, but if the client supports a group from a more preferred tuple, but did not predict any corresponding keyshares, the server will ask the client to retry the ClientHello (by issuing a Hello Retry Request or HRR) with the most preferred mutually supported group. The above works as expected when the server's configuration uses the built-in default group list, or explicitly defines its own list by directly defining the various desired groups and group 'tuples'. No OpenSSL FIPS modules are affected by this issue, the code in question lies outside the FIPS boundary. OpenSSL 3.6 and 3.5 are vulnerable to this issue. OpenSSL 3.6 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.6.2 once it is released. OpenSSL 3.5 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 3.5.6 once it is released. OpenSSL 3.4, 3.3, 3.0, 1.0.2 and 1.1.1 are not affected by this issue.

公開: 2026-03-13 最終更新: 2026-06-17 Assigner: [email protected] ソース: [email protected]

総合評価: CVE-2026-2673 は低リスク(38.5/100)。CVSS 深刻度は中。悪用される可能性が高い(EPSS 0.43%、34 パーセンタイル) 推奨対応: 悪用情報と EPSS の推移を監視し、必要に応じて優先度を見直してください。

リスクは変動します。再評価に基づき、本ページの表示内容を更新しています。

CVE-2026-2673 の EPSS(Exploit Prediction Scoring System)スコア

EPSS は日次で悪用されやすさの相対度合いを推定します。パーセンタイルは採点済み CVE の中での相対位置(高いほど相対的に深刻)を示します。

# 日付 旧 EPSS スコア 新 EPSS スコア Δ(新 − 旧)
1 2026-06-15 0.02% 0.43% +0.41%
2 2026-03-14 0.02%

EPSS の全履歴 (全 2 件)

CVE-2026-2673 の CVSS(Common Vulnerability Scoring System)指標

この CVE の CVSS 指標。

ベーススコア バージョン 深刻度 ベクトル 悪用しやすさ 影響 スコアの出典
6.5 3.1 MEDIUM
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L クリックして展開
攻撃ベクター (AV:N)
インターネットなど、ルーティングされたネットワーク越しに遠隔から悪用しうる。端末の前にいる必要はない。
攻撃の複雑さ (AC:L)
攻撃者が条件を満たせば、レース条件や珍しい構成に依存せずに再現しやすい。
必要な権限 (PR:N)
事前のログインや昇格は不要で、匿名アクセスのまま踏み台にしうる。
ユーザーの関与 (UI:N)
メールのリンクを開く、マクロを有効にするなど、被害者の協力がなくても成立しうる。
スコープ (S:U)
影響は脆弱コンポーネントと同一のセキュリティ権限・信頼境界の内側に収まる。
機密性への影響 (C:N)
機微情報の漏えいは想定しにくい。
完全性への影響 (I:L)
レコードの一部書き換えや設定の歪みなど、限定的だが検知・復旧が必要な水準。
可用性への影響 (A:L)
遅延や一部機能の停止、断続的な障害など、運用で吸収しうる範囲。
3.9 2.5 134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0

CVE-2026-2673 の弱点分類(列挙)

CVE-2026-2673 の OS トラッカー

vendor priority summary link
alpine CVE-2026-2673: 1 source package rows (openssl); 3 state rows across 3 repos (3.22-main, 3.23-main, edge-main); fixed 3, open 0. https://security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2026-2673
debian unimportant CVE-2026-2673 unimportant priority: Debian including 1 source packages (openssl), 5 status rows across 5 suites (bookworm, bullseye, forky, sid, trixie): resolved 5. https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2026-2673
redhat low https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-2673
suse medium CVE-2026-2673 severity moderate: SUSE including 59 source package names (compat-openssl098, libopenssl-1_0_0-devel, …), 345 product×package rows across 36 product lines (SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS, SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS, … (36 product lines)): Known Not Affected 324, Fixed 14, First Fixed 7. https://www.suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-2673/
ubuntu low CVE-2026-2673 low priority: Ubuntu including 5 source packages (edk2, nodejs, openssl, openssl-fips, openssl1.0), 32 status rows across 8 suites (bionic, focal, jammy, noble, questing, trusty, upstream, xenial): not-affected 21, needs-triage 5, DNE 4, needed 1, released 1. https://ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-2673

CVE-2026-2673 の影響を受けるソフトウェア/構成

ベンダー 製品 バージョン 生の CPE
openssl openssl >= 3.5.0, < 3.5.6 cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
openssl openssl >= 3.6.0, < 3.6.2 cpe:2.3:a:openssl:openssl:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
siemens simatic_cn_4100_firmware < 5.0 cpe:2.3:o:siemens:simatic_cn_4100_firmware:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

CVE-2026-2673 の参考情報

cvelogic Threat Intelligence