Pidgin 関連製品全体の CVE とセキュリティ脆弱性情報を集約し、CVSS、EPSS、公開日、脆弱性情報データを掲載しています。
過去の問題は主に バッファオーバーフロー and vendor risk input validation などに関し、一部は アプリケーションクラッシュ を招き、vendor surface software deployment and vendor surface production workloads 関連の場面に影響します。
掲載データは公開脆弱性情報とセキュリティ公告に基づき、過去の暴露面と修補優先度の評価に利用できます。
| CVE | 概要 | ソース | CVSS 最大値 | EPSS（%） | 公開 | 更新 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-25544 | Pidgin 2.13.0 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows local attackers to crash the application by providing an excessively long username string during account creation. Attackers can input a buffer of 1000 characters in the username field and trigger a crash when joining a chat, causing the application to become unavailable. | [email protected] | 6.9 | 0.19% | 2026-03-21 | 2026-04-16 |
| CVE-2022-26491 | An issue was discovered in Pidgin before 2.14.9. A remote attacker who can spoof DNS responses can redirect a client connection to a malicious server. The client will perform TLS certificate verification of the malicious domain name instead of the original XMPP service domain, allowing the attacker to take over control over the XMPP connection and to obtain user credentials and all communication content. This is similar to CVE-2022-24968. | [email protected] | 5.9 | 2.36% | 2022-06-02 | 2024-11-21 |
| CVE-2012-1257 | Pidgin 2.10.0 uses DBUS for certain cleartext communication, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information via a dbus session monitor. | [email protected] | 5.5 | 0.74% | 2019-11-20 | 2024-11-21 |
| CVE-2016-1000030 | Pidgin version <2.11.0 contains a vulnerability in X.509 Certificates imports specifically due to improper check of return values from gnutls_x509_crt_init() and gnutls_x509_crt_import() that can result in code execution. This attack appear to be exploitable via custom X.509 certificate from another client. This vulnerability appears to have been fixed in 2.11.0. | [email protected] | 9.8 | 1.84% | 2018-09-05 | 2024-11-21 |
| CVE-2017-2640 | An out-of-bounds write flaw was found in the way Pidgin before 2.12.0 processed XML content. A malicious remote server could potentially use this flaw to crash Pidgin or execute arbitrary code in the context of the pidgin process. | [email protected] | 7.5 | 6.51% | 2018-07-27 | 2024-11-21 |
| CVE-2016-2379 | The Mxit protocol uses weak encryption when encrypting user passwords, which might allow attackers to (1) decrypt hashed passwords by leveraging knowledge of client registration codes or (2) gain login access by eavesdropping on login messages and re-using the hashed passwords. | [email protected] | 8.8 | 0.40% | 2017-03-29 | 2026-05-13 |
| CVE-2016-4323 | A directory traversal exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent from the server could potentially result in an overwrite of files. A malicious server or someone with access to the network traffic can provide an invalid filename for a splash image triggering the vulnerability. | [email protected] | 3.7 | 2.29% | 2017-01-06 | 2026-05-06 |
| CVE-2016-2380 | An information leak exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent to the server could potentially result in an out-of-bounds read. A user could be convinced to enter a particular string which would then get converted incorrectly and could lead to a potential out-of-bounds read. | [email protected] | 3.1 | 1.75% | 2017-01-06 | 2026-05-06 |
| CVE-2016-2378 | A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol Pidgin. Specially crafted data sent via the server could potentially result in a buffer overflow, potentially resulting in memory corruption. A malicious server or an unfiltered malicious user can send negative length values to trigger this vulnerability. | [email protected] | 8.1 | 2.50% | 2017-01-06 | 2026-05-06 |
| CVE-2016-2377 | A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent by the server could potentially result in an out-of-bounds write of one byte. A malicious server can send a negative content-length in response to a HTTP request triggering the vulnerability. | [email protected] | 8.1 | 2.65% | 2017-01-06 | 2026-05-06 |
| CVE-2016-2376 | A buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent from the server could potentially result in arbitrary code execution. A malicious server or an attacker who intercepts the network traffic can send an invalid size for a packet which will trigger a buffer overflow. | [email protected] | 8.1 | 3.70% | 2017-01-06 | 2026-05-06 |
| CVE-2016-2375 | An exploitable out-of-bounds read exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT contact information sent from the server can result in memory disclosure. | [email protected] | 5.3 | 2.69% | 2017-01-06 | 2026-05-06 |
| CVE-2016-2374 | An exploitable memory corruption vulnerability exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT MultiMX message sent via the server can result in an out-of-bounds write leading to memory disclosure and code execution. | [email protected] | 8.1 | 3.20% | 2017-01-06 | 2026-05-06 |
| CVE-2016-2373 | A denial of service vulnerability exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent via the server could potentially result in an out-of-bounds read. A malicious server or user can send an invalid mood to trigger this vulnerability. | [email protected] | 5.9 | 2.28% | 2017-01-06 | 2026-05-06 |
| CVE-2016-2372 | An information leak exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent via the server could potentially result in an out-of-bounds read. A malicious user, server, or man-in-the-middle attacker can send an invalid size for a file transfer which will trigger an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. This could result in a denial of service or copy data from memory to the file, resulting in an information leak if the file is sent to another user. | [email protected] | 5.9 | 1.76% | 2017-01-06 | 2026-05-06 |
| CVE-2016-2371 | An out-of-bounds write vulnerability exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent via the server could cause memory corruption resulting in code execution. | [email protected] | 8.1 | 3.15% | 2017-01-06 | 2026-05-06 |
| CVE-2016-2370 | A denial of service vulnerability exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent from the server could potentially result in an out-of-bounds read. A malicious server or man-in-the-middle attacker can send invalid data to trigger this vulnerability. | [email protected] | 5.9 | 2.10% | 2017-01-06 | 2026-05-06 |
| CVE-2016-2369 | A NULL pointer dereference vulnerability exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent via the server could potentially result in a denial of service vulnerability. A malicious server can send a packet starting with a NULL byte triggering the vulnerability. | [email protected] | 5.9 | 2.23% | 2017-01-06 | 2026-05-06 |
| CVE-2016-2368 | Multiple memory corruption vulnerabilities exist in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent via the server could result in multiple buffer overflows, potentially resulting in code execution or memory disclosure. | [email protected] | 8.1 | 4.52% | 2017-01-06 | 2026-05-06 |
| CVE-2016-2367 | An information leak exists in the handling of the MXIT protocol in Pidgin. Specially crafted MXIT data sent via the server could potentially result in an out-of-bounds read. A malicious user, server, or man-in-the-middle can send an invalid size for an avatar which will trigger an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. This could result in a denial of service or copy data from memory to the file, resulting in an information leak if the avatar is sent to another user. | [email protected] | 5.9 | 1.91% | 2017-01-06 | 2026-05-06 |