securifi 関連製品全体の CVE とセキュリティ脆弱性情報を集約し、CVSS、EPSS、公開日、脆弱性情報データを掲載しています。
公開された問題は バッファオーバーフロー、vendor risk input validation, and vendor risk cross-site scripting に関連することが多く、vendor surface production workloads and vendor surface software deployment の文脈で ファイル上書き and vendor impact session compromise などの暴露リスクを伴う場合があります。
掲載データは公開脆弱性情報とセキュリティ公告に基づき、過去の暴露面と修補優先度の評価に利用できます。
| CVE | 概要 | ソース | CVSS 最大値 | EPSS（%） | 公開 | 更新 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-8337 | An issue was discovered on Securifi Almond, Almond+, and Almond 2015 devices with firmware AL-R096. The device provides a user with the capability of executing various actions on the web management interface. It seems that the device does not implement any Origin header check which allows an attacker who can trick a user to navigate to an attacker's webpage to exploit this issue and brute force the password for the web management interface. It also allows an attacker to then execute any other ac | [email protected] | 8.8 | 2.60% | 2019-06-18 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2017-8334 | An issue was discovered on Securifi Almond, Almond+, and Almond 2015 devices with firmware AL-R096. The device provides a user with the capability of blocking IP addresses using the web management interface. It seems that the device does not implement any cross-site scripting forgery protection mechanism which allows an attacker to trick a user who is logged in to the web management interface into executing a cross-site scripting payload on the user's browser and execute any action on the device | [email protected] | 8.0 | 0.93% | 2019-06-18 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2017-8332 | An issue was discovered on Securifi Almond, Almond+, and Almond 2015 devices with firmware AL-R096. The device provides a user with the capability of blocking key words passing in the web traffic to prevent kids from watching content that might be deemed unsafe using the web management interface. It seems that the device does not implement any cross-site scripting protection mechanism which allows an attacker to trick a user who is logged in to the web management interface into executing a store | [email protected] | 8.8 | 2.93% | 2019-06-18 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2017-8330 | An issue was discovered on Securifi Almond, Almond+, and Almond 2015 devices with firmware AL-R096. The device provides a UPnP functionality for devices to interface with the router and interact with the device. It seems that the "NewInMessage" SOAP parameter passed with a huge payload results in crashing the process. If the firmware version AL-R096 is dissected using binwalk tool, we obtain a cpio-root archive which contains the filesystem set up on the device that contains all the binaries. Th | [email protected] | 6.5 | 1.48% | 2019-06-18 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2017-8328 | An issue was discovered on Securifi Almond, Almond+, and Almond 2015 devices with firmware AL-R096. The device provides a user with the capability of changing the administrative password for the web management interface. It seems that the device does not implement any cross site request forgery protection mechanism which allows an attacker to trick a user who is logged in to the web management interface to change a user's password. Also this is a systemic issue. | [email protected] | 8.8 | 1.37% | 2019-06-18 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2017-8333 | An issue was discovered on Securifi Almond, Almond+, and Almond 2015 devices with firmware AL-R096. The device provides a user with the capability of adding new routes to the device. It seems that the POST parameters passed in this request to set up routes on the device can be set in such a way that would result in passing commands to a "popen" API in the function and thus result in command injection on the device. If the firmware version AL-R096 is dissected using binwalk tool, we obtain a cpio | [email protected] | 8.8 | 7.09% | 2019-06-18 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2017-8331 | An issue was discovered on Securifi Almond, Almond+, and Almond 2015 devices with firmware AL-R096. The device provides a user with the capability of adding new port forwarding rules to the device. It seems that the POST parameters passed in this request to set up routes on the device can be set in such a way that would result in passing commands to a "system" API in the function and thus result in command injection on the device. If the firmware version AL-R096 is dissected using binwalk tool, | [email protected] | 8.8 | 6.98% | 2019-06-18 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2017-8329 | An issue was discovered on Securifi Almond, Almond+, and Almond 2015 devices with firmware AL-R096. The device provides a user with the capability of setting a name for the wireless network. These values are stored by the device in NVRAM (Non-volatile RAM). It seems that the POST parameters passed in this request to set up names on the device do not have a string length check on them. This allows an attacker to send a large payload in the "mssid_1" POST parameter. The device also allows a user t | [email protected] | 6.4 | 2.01% | 2019-06-18 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2017-8336 | An issue was discovered on Securifi Almond, Almond+, and Almond 2015 devices with firmware AL-R096. The device provides a user with the capability of adding new routes to the device. It seems that the POST parameters passed in this request to set up routes on the device can be set in such a way that would result in overflowing the stack set up and allow an attacker to control the $ra register stored on the stack. If the firmware version AL-R096 is dissected using binwalk tool, we obtain a cpio-r | [email protected] | 8.8 | 2.69% | 2019-06-18 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2017-8335 | An issue was discovered on Securifi Almond, Almond+, and Almond 2015 devices with firmware AL-R096. The device provides a user with the capability of setting name for wireless network. These values are stored by the device in NVRAM (Non-volatile RAM). It seems that the POST parameters passed in this request to set up names on the device do not have a string length check on them. This allows an attacker to send a large payload in the "mssid_1" POST parameter. The device also allows a user to view | [email protected] | 8.0 | 2.08% | 2019-06-18 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2015-7296 | Securifi Almond devices with firmware before AL1-R201EXP10-L304-W34 and Almond-2015 devices with firmware before AL2-R088M use a linear algorithm for selecting the ID value in the header of a DNS query performed on behalf of the device itself, which makes it easier for remote attackers to spoof responses by including this ID value, as demonstrated by a response containing the address of the firmware update server, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-2914. | [email protected] | 4.3 | 1.24% | 2015-09-21 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2015-2917 | Securifi Almond devices with firmware before AL1-R201EXP10-L304-W34 and Almond-2015 devices with firmware before AL2-R088M unintentionally omit the X-Frame-Options HTTP header, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct clickjacking attacks via a crafted web site that contains a (1) FRAME, (2) IFRAME, or (3) OBJECT element. | [email protected] | 4.3 | 0.93% | 2015-09-21 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2015-2916 | Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability on Securifi Almond devices with firmware before AL1-R201EXP10-L304-W34 and Almond-2015 devices with firmware before AL2-R088M allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users. | [email protected] | 6.8 | 0.66% | 2015-09-21 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2015-2915 | Securifi Almond devices with firmware before AL1-R201EXP10-L304-W34 and Almond-2015 devices with firmware before AL2-R088M have a default password of admin for the admin account, which allows remote attackers to obtain web-management access by leveraging the ability to authenticate from the intranet. | [email protected] | 7.3 | 0.86% | 2015-09-21 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2015-2914 | Securifi Almond devices with firmware before AL1-R201EXP10-L304-W34 and Almond-2015 devices with firmware before AL2-R088M use a fixed source-port number in outbound DNS queries performed on behalf of any device, which makes it easier for remote attackers to spoof responses by using this number for the destination port, a different vulnerability than CVE-2015-7296. | [email protected] | 5.0 | 1.52% | 2015-09-21 | 2026-06-16 |