NVD や CVE、ほか複数の脅威フィードを束ね、RCE など高リスクな事象を深く追える一覧です。CVSS と EPSS を組み合わせ、Exploit 参照や PoC の有無から悪用しやすさを追跡します。ベンダー修正や緩和策の文脈とあわせて優先度を決め、対応サイクルを短く保ちつつ重要資産を守る支援をします。
| CVE | 説明 | CVSS 最大値 | EPSS（%） | 公開 | 更新 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2004-2775 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.24% | 2020-11-05 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2004-2774 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.24% | 2020-11-05 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2004-2773 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.24% | 2020-11-05 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2004-2772 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.24% | 2020-11-05 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2004-2776 | go.cgi in GoScript 2.0 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via shell metacharacters in the (1) query string or (2) artarchive parameter. | 9.8 | 2.99% | 2019-12-31 | 2024-11-20 |
| CVE-2004-2779 | id3_utf16_deserialize() in utf16.c in libid3tag through 0.15.1b misparses ID3v2 tags encoded in UTF-16 with an odd number of bytes, triggering an endless loop allocating memory until an OOM condition is reached, leading to denial-of-service (DoS). | 7.5 | 0.33% | 2018-02-20 | 2024-11-20 |
| CVE-2004-2778 | Ebuild in Gentoo may change directory and file permissions depending on the order of installed packages, which allows local users to read or write to restricted directories or execute restricted commands via navigating to the affected directories, or executing the affected commands. | 7.1 | 0.05% | 2017-06-27 | 2026-05-13 |
| CVE-2004-1344 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2004-0995 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2004-0861 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2004-0860 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2004-0859 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2004-0858 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2004-0857 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2004-0856 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2004-0855 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2004-0854 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2004-0853 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2004-0818 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2004-0756 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2004. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |