NVD や CVE、ほか複数の脅威フィードを束ね、RCE など高リスクな事象を深く追える一覧です。CVSS と EPSS を組み合わせ、Exploit 参照や PoC の有無から悪用しやすさを追跡します。ベンダー修正や緩和策の文脈とあわせて優先度を決め、対応サイクルを短く保ちつつ重要資産を守る支援をします。
Assigner（CNA／発行元）：[email protected] この条件を外す
| CVE | 説明 | CVSS 最大値 | EPSS（%） | 公開 | 更新 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2003-1217 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2003-1218 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2003. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2005-1844 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2005-1845 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2005. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2007-6247 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2007. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2009-1871 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2009-3795 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2009. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2010-0200 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2010-1241. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2010-1241. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2010-1241 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | 該当なし | 0.17% | 2010-04-14 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2011-0576 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2011. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2011-0597 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2011. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2011-0601 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2011. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2011-0616 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2011. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2011-0617 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2011. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2011-2129 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2011. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2011-2418 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2011. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2011-4375 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2011. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.17% | 2013-10-01 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2011-4376 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2011. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.17% | 2013-10-01 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2011-4377 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2011. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.17% | 2013-10-01 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2011-4378 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2011. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.17% | 2013-10-01 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2011-4379 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2011. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.17% | 2013-10-01 | 2023-11-07 |