NVD や CVE、ほか複数の脅威フィードを束ね、RCE など高リスクな事象を深く追える一覧です。CVSS と EPSS を組み合わせ、Exploit 参照や PoC の有無から悪用しやすさを追跡します。ベンダー修正や緩和策の文脈とあわせて優先度を決め、対応サイクルを短く保ちつつ重要資産を守る支援をします。
Assigner（CNA／発行元）：[email protected] この条件を外す
| CVE | 説明 | CVSS 最大値 | EPSS（%） | 公開 | 更新 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2008-0030 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2008-2737 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2008-3558. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2008-3558. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2008-3558 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | 該当なし | 0.17% | 2008-08-18 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2008-3822 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2008. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2012-2497 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2012-3497, CVE-2012-6400. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2012-3497 and CVE-2012-6400. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2012-3497 (an issue in Xen) or CVE-2012-6400 (an issue not in Xen) instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | 該当なし | 0.17% | 2013-10-02 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2012-4080 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2012. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2012-4100 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2012. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2012-4101 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2012. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2012-4118 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2012. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2012-4119 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2012. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2012-4120 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2012. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2012-4123 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2012. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2012-4124 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2012. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2012-4125 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2012. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2012-4126 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2012. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2012-4127 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2012. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2012-4128 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2012. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2012-4129 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2012. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2012-4130 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2012. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2012-4132 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2012. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2012-4133 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2012. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |