NVD や CVE、ほか複数の脅威フィードを束ね、RCE など高リスクな事象を深く追える一覧です。CVSS と EPSS を組み合わせ、Exploit 参照や PoC の有無から悪用しやすさを追跡します。ベンダー修正や緩和策の文脈とあわせて優先度を決め、対応サイクルを短く保ちつつ重要資産を守る支援をします。
Assigner（CNA／発行元）：[email protected] この条件を外す
| CVE | 説明 | CVSS 最大値 | EPSS（%） | 公開 | 更新 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2006-3863 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2006-3865 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2006-3866 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2006-4868. Reason: This candidate is a duplicate of CVE-2006-4868. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2006-4868 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | 該当なし | 0.26% | 2006-09-19 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2006-3870 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2006-3871 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2006-3872 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2006-3874 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2006-4690 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2006-4698 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2006-4699 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2006-4700 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2006-4701 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2006-4703 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2006-5572 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2006-5573 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2006-5575 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2006-5576 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2006-5582 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2006-5992 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |
| CVE-2006-5993 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2006. Notes: none | 該当なし | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-06 |