NVD や CVE、ほか複数の脅威フィードを束ね、RCE など高リスクな事象を深く追える一覧です。CVSS と EPSS を組み合わせ、Exploit 参照や PoC の有無から悪用しやすさを追跡します。ベンダー修正や緩和策の文脈とあわせて優先度を決め、対応サイクルを短く保ちつつ重要資産を守る支援をします。
Assigner（CNA／発行元）：[email protected] この条件を外す
| CVE | 説明 | CVSS 最大値 | EPSS（%） | 公開 | 更新 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-0050 | In handleBondStateChanged of AdapterService.java, there is a possible sensitive information disclosure due to a permissions bypass. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 3.3 | 0.07% | 2026-06-01 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2026-0049 | In onHeaderDecoded of LocalImageResolver.java, there is a possible persistent denial of service due to resource exhaustion. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 6.2 | 0.10% | 2026-04-06 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2026-0048 | In hide of WindowState.java, there is a possible way to trick the user into approving permissions due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 6.8 | 0.07% | 2026-06-01 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2026-0047 | In dumpBitmapsProto of ActivityManagerService.java, there is a possible way for an app to access private information due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 8.4 | 0.14% | 2026-03-02 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2026-0046 | In InputInterceptor of Letterbox.java, there is a possible way to trick a user into accepting a permission due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 6.2 | 0.08% | 2026-06-01 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2026-0045 | In bta_jv_rfcomm_connect of bta_jv_act.cc, there is a possible bypass of bonding for a secure connection due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 7.8 | 0.08% | 2026-06-01 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2026-0044 | In multiple functions of ubsan_throwing_runtime.cpp, there is a possible way to cause the system to crash due to an integer overflow. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 6.5 | 0.25% | 2026-06-01 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2026-0043 | In multiple functions of ubsan_throwing_runtime.cpp, there is a possible persistent denial of service due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 5.5 | 0.07% | 2026-06-01 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2026-0042 | In multiple functions of ubsan_throwing_runtime.cpp, there is a possible persistent denial of service due to resource exhaustion. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 5.5 | 0.07% | 2026-06-01 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2026-0041 | In multiple functions of ubsan_throwing_runtime.cpp, there is a possible UBSan failure due to an integer overflow. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 6.5 | 0.25% | 2026-06-01 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2026-0040 | In multiple functions of ubsan_throwing_runtime.cpp, there is a possible way to cause a crash due to an integer overflow. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 6.5 | 0.25% | 2026-06-01 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2026-0039 | In multiple functions of ubsan_throwing_runtime.cpp, there is a possible persistent denial of service due to an integer overflow. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 6.5 | 0.25% | 2026-06-01 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2026-0038 | In multiple functions of mem_protect.c, there is a possible way to execute arbitrary code due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 8.4 | 0.23% | 2026-03-02 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2026-0037 | In multiple functions of ffa.c, there is a possible memory corruption due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 8.4 | 0.15% | 2026-03-02 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2026-0036 | In startAnimation of StageCoordinator.java, there is a possible tapjacking issue due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 7.8 | 0.07% | 2026-06-01 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2026-0035 | In createRequest of MediaProvider.java, there is a possible way for an app to gain read/write access to non-existing files due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 8.4 | 0.10% | 2026-03-02 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2026-0034 | In setPackageOrComponentEnabled of ManagedServices.java, there is a possible notification policy desync due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 8.4 | 0.10% | 2026-03-02 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2026-0032 | In multiple functions of mem_protect.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 7.8 | 0.09% | 2026-03-02 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2026-0031 | In multiple functions of mem_protect.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an integer overflow. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 8.4 | 0.15% | 2026-03-02 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2026-0030 | In __host_check_page_state_range of mem_protect.c, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 8.4 | 0.15% | 2026-03-02 | 2026-06-17 |