NVD や CVE、ほか複数の脅威フィードを束ね、RCE など高リスクな事象を深く追える一覧です。CVSS と EPSS を組み合わせ、Exploit 参照や PoC の有無から悪用しやすさを追跡します。ベンダー修正や緩和策の文脈とあわせて優先度を決め、対応サイクルを短く保ちつつ重要資産を守る支援をします。
Assigner（CNA／発行元）：[email protected] この条件を外す
| CVE | 説明 | CVSS 最大値 | EPSS（%） | 公開 | 更新 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-48620 | In onSomePackagesChanged of VoiceInteractionManagerService.java, there is a possible way for a third party application's component name to persist even after uninstalling due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 7.8 | 0.08% | 2025-12-08 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48618 | In processLaunchBrowser of CommandParamsFactory.java, there is a possible browser interaction from the lockscreen due to improper locking. This could lead to physical escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 6.8 | 0.11% | 2025-12-08 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48615 | In getComponentName of MediaButtonReceiverHolder.java, there is a possible desync in persistence due to resource exhaustion. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 7.8 | 0.07% | 2025-12-08 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48614 | In rebootWipeUserData of RecoverySystem.java, there is a possible way to factory reset the device while in DSU mode due to a missing permission check. This could lead to physical denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 4.6 | 0.09% | 2025-12-08 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48612 | In setDefaultKey of DefaultPaymentSettings.java, there is a possible way for an application to set the main user's default NFC payment setting due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 7.8 | 0.07% | 2025-12-08 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48610 | In __pkvm_guest_relinquish_to_host of mem_protect.c, there is a possible configuration data leak due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 5.5 | 0.08% | 2025-12-08 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48607 | In multiple locations, there is a possible way to create a large amount of app ops due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 5.5 | 0.07% | 2025-12-08 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48604 | In multiple locations, there is a possible way to read files from another user due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 5.5 | 0.07% | 2025-12-08 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48603 | In InputMethodInfo of InputMethodInfo.java, there is a possible permanent denial of service due to resource exhaustion. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 5.5 | 0.08% | 2025-12-08 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48601 | In multiple locations, there is a possible permanent denial of service due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 5.5 | 0.07% | 2025-12-08 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48600 | In multiple files, there is a possible way to reveal information across users due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 5.5 | 0.07% | 2025-12-08 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48599 | In multiple functions of WifiScanModeActivity.java, there is a possible way to bypass a device config restriction due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 7.8 | 0.07% | 2025-12-08 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48598 | In multiple locations, there is a possible way to alter the primary user's face unlock settings due to a confused deputy. This could lead to physical escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 6.6 | 0.10% | 2025-12-08 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48597 | In multiple locations, there is a possible way to trick a user into accepting a permission due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 7.8 | 0.07% | 2025-12-08 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48596 | In appendFrom of Parcel.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 7.8 | 0.08% | 2025-12-08 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48594 | In onUidImportance of DisassociationProcessor.java, there is a possible way to retain companion application privileges after disassociation due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | 7.3 | 0.08% | 2025-12-08 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48592 | In initDecoder of C2SoftDav1dDec.cpp, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to remote information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 7.5 | 0.30% | 2025-12-08 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48591 | In multiple locations, there is a possible way to read files from another user due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 5.5 | 0.08% | 2025-12-08 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48590 | In verifyAndGetBypass of AppOpsService.java, there is a possible method for a malicious app to prevent dialing emergency services under limited circumstances due to resource exhaustion. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 5.5 | 0.09% | 2025-12-08 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2025-48589 | In multiple functions of HeaderPrivacyIconsController.kt, there is a possible way to grand permissions across user due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | 7.8 | 0.09% | 2025-12-08 | 2026-06-17 |