This page lists publicly disclosed CVE vulnerabilities affecting foxitsoftware phantompdf (linked via NVD CPE). Each row includes severity scores, summaries, and publication dates to help identify and analyze security issues.
| CVE | Summary | Source | Max CVSS | EPSS % | Published | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-27265 | This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 10.1.0.37527. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of U3D objects embedded in PDF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated object. An attac | [email protected] | 3.3 | 2.02% | 2021-03-30 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2021-27264 | This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 10.1.0.37527. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of U3D objects embedded in PDF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated object. An attac | [email protected] | 3.3 | 2.19% | 2021-03-30 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2021-27263 | This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 10.1.0.37527. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of U3D objects embedded in PDF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated object. An attac | [email protected] | 3.3 | 2.90% | 2021-03-30 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2021-27262 | This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 10.1.0.37527. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of U3D objects embedded in PDF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated object. An attac | [email protected] | 3.3 | 2.02% | 2021-03-30 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2021-27261 | This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 10.1.0.37527. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of U3D objects in PDF files. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a read past the end of an allocated structure. An attacker can levera | [email protected] | 7.8 | 2.69% | 2021-03-30 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2020-27860 | This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.0.1.35811. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the processing of XFA templates. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated data structure. An attacker can leverage this | [email protected] | 7.8 | 3.55% | 2021-02-11 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2018-20316 | Foxit Reader before 9.5, and PhantomPDF before 8.3.10 and 9.x before 9.5, has a proxyDoAction race condition that can cause a stack-based buffer overflow or an out-of-bounds read, a different issue than CVE-2018-20310 because of a different opcode. | [email protected] | 8.1 | 0.82% | 2021-01-07 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2018-20315 | Foxit Reader before 9.5, and PhantomPDF before 8.3.10 and 9.x before 9.5, has a race condition that can cause a stack-based buffer overflow or an out-of-bounds read. | [email protected] | 8.1 | 0.82% | 2021-01-07 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2018-20314 | Foxit Reader before 9.5, and PhantomPDF before 8.3.10 and 9.x before 9.5, has a proxyCheckLicence race condition that can cause a stack-based buffer overflow or an out-of-bounds read. | [email protected] | 8.1 | 0.84% | 2021-01-07 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2018-20313 | Foxit Reader before 9.5, and PhantomPDF before 8.3.10 and 9.x before 9.5, has a proxyPreviewAction race condition that can cause a stack-based buffer overflow or an out-of-bounds read. | [email protected] | 8.1 | 0.82% | 2021-01-07 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2018-18688 | The Portable Document Format (PDF) specification does not provide any information regarding the concrete procedure of how to validate signatures. Consequently, an Incremental Saving vulnerability exists in multiple products. When an attacker uses the Incremental Saving feature to add pages or annotations, Body Updates are displayed to the user without any action by the signature-validation logic. This affects Foxit Reader before 9.4 and PhantomPDF before 8.3.9 and 9.x before 9.4. It also affects | [email protected] | 5.3 | 1.13% | 2021-01-07 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2018-20312 | Foxit Reader before 9.5, and PhantomPDF before 8.3.10 and 9.x before 9.5, has a proxyDoAction race condition that can cause a stack-based buffer overflow or an out-of-bounds read, a different issue than CVE-2018-20310 because of a different opcode. | [email protected] | 8.1 | 0.82% | 2021-01-07 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2018-20311 | Foxit Reader before 9.5, and PhantomPDF before 8.3.10 and 9.x before 9.5, has a proxyCPDFAction race condition that can cause a stack-based buffer overflow or an out-of-bounds read. | [email protected] | 8.1 | 0.82% | 2021-01-07 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2018-20310 | Foxit Reader before 9.5, and PhantomPDF before 8.3.10 and 9.x before 9.5, has a proxyDoAction race condition that can cause a stack-based buffer overflow or an out-of-bounds read. | [email protected] | 8.1 | 0.86% | 2021-01-07 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2018-20309 | Foxit Reader before 9.5, and PhantomPDF before 8.3.10 and 9.x before 9.5, has a proxyGetAppEdition race condition that can cause a stack-based buffer overflow or an out-of-bounds read. | [email protected] | 8.1 | 0.82% | 2021-01-07 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2020-35931 | An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader before 10.1.1 (and before 4.1.1 on macOS) and PhantomPDF before 9.7.5 and 10.x before 10.1.1 (and before 4.1.1 on macOS). An attacker can spoof a certified PDF document via an Evil Annotation Attack because the products fail to consider a null value for a Subtype entry of the Annotation dictionary, in an incremental update. | [email protected] | 7.8 | 2.29% | 2020-12-31 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2020-28203 | An issue was discovered in Foxit Reader and PhantomPDF 10.1.0.37527 and earlier. There is a null pointer access/dereference while opening a crafted PDF file, leading the application to crash (denial of service). | [email protected] | 5.5 | 1.87% | 2020-12-15 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2020-17417 | This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.0.1.35811. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the Annotation objects. The issue results from the lack of validating the existence of an object prior to performing operations on the object. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execu | [email protected] | 7.8 | 9.08% | 2020-10-13 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2020-17416 | This vulnerability allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Foxit Reader 10.0.0.35798. User interaction is required to exploit this vulnerability in that the target must visit a malicious page or open a malicious file. The specific flaw exists within the parsing of JPEG2000 images. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a write past the end of an allocated structure. An attacker can leverage this vulne | [email protected] | 7.8 | 9.08% | 2020-10-13 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2020-17415 | This vulnerability allows local attackers to escalate privileges on affected installations of Foxit PhantomPDF 10.0.0.35798. An attacker must first obtain the ability to execute low-privileged code on the target system in order to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the handling of the configuration files used by the Foxit PhantomPDF Update Service. The issue results from incorrect permissions set on a resource used by the service. An attacker can leverage this vulnerabil | [email protected] | 7.8 | 2.06% | 2020-10-13 | 2026-06-16 |