This page lists publicly disclosed CVE vulnerabilities affecting oracle secure_global_desktop (linked via NVD CPE). Each row includes severity scores, summaries, and publication dates to help identify and analyze security issues.
| CVE | Summary | Source | Max CVSS | EPSS % | Published | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-35650 | Vulnerability in the Oracle Secure Global Desktop product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Client). The supported version that is affected is 5.6. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Oracle Secure Global Desktop. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Secure Globa | [email protected] | 4.6 | 0.62% | 2021-10-20 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2021-35649 | Vulnerability in the Oracle Secure Global Desktop product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Server). The supported version that is affected is 5.6. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Oracle Secure Global Desktop. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Secure Global Desktop accessible data and unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of serv | [email protected] | 5.4 | 0.78% | 2021-10-20 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2021-40438 KEV | A crafted request uri-path can cause mod_proxy to forward the request to an origin server choosen by the remote user. This issue affects Apache HTTP Server 2.4.48 and earlier. | [email protected] | 9.0 | 100.00% | 2021-09-16 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2021-2447 | Vulnerability in the Oracle Secure Global Desktop product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Server). The supported version that is affected is 5.6. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Oracle Secure Global Desktop. While the vulnerability is in Oracle Secure Global Desktop, attacks may significantly impact additional products. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Secure Glo | [email protected] | 9.9 | 1.09% | 2021-07-21 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2021-2446 | Vulnerability in the Oracle Secure Global Desktop product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Client). The supported version that is affected is 5.6. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Oracle Secure Global Desktop. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Secure Global Desktop, attacks may significantly impact additional produc | [email protected] | 9.6 | 1.58% | 2021-07-21 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2021-33037 | Apache Tomcat 10.0.0-M1 to 10.0.6, 9.0.0.M1 to 9.0.46 and 8.5.0 to 8.5.66 did not correctly parse the HTTP transfer-encoding request header in some circumstances leading to the possibility to request smuggling when used with a reverse proxy. Specifically: - Tomcat incorrectly ignored the transfer encoding header if the client declared it would only accept an HTTP/1.0 response; - Tomcat honoured the identify encoding; and - Tomcat did not ensure that, if present, the chunked encoding was the fina | [email protected] | 5.3 | 75.35% | 2021-07-12 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2021-2248 | Vulnerability in the Oracle Secure Global Desktop product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Server). The supported version that is affected is 5.6. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Oracle Secure Global Desktop. While the vulnerability is in Oracle Secure Global Desktop, attacks may significantly impact additional products. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Secure Gl | [email protected] | 10.0 | 2.50% | 2021-04-22 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2021-2221 | Vulnerability in the Oracle Secure Global Desktop product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Client). The supported version that is affected is 5.6. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Oracle Secure Global Desktop. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Secure Global Desktop, attacks may significantly impact additional produc | [email protected] | 9.6 | 1.99% | 2021-04-22 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2021-2177 | Vulnerability in the Oracle Secure Global Desktop product of Oracle Virtualization (component: Gateway). The supported version that is affected is 5.6. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Oracle Secure Global Desktop. While the vulnerability is in Oracle Secure Global Desktop, attacks may significantly impact additional products. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Secure G | [email protected] | 10.0 | 2.50% | 2021-04-22 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2021-3450 | The X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT flag enables additional security checks of the certificates present in a certificate chain. It is not set by default. Starting from OpenSSL version 1.1.1h a check to disallow certificates in the chain that have explicitly encoded elliptic curve parameters was added as an additional strict check. An error in the implementation of this check meant that the result of a previous check to confirm that certificates in the chain are valid CA certificates was overwritten. Thi | [email protected] | 7.4 | 18.34% | 2021-03-25 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2021-3449 | An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). O | [email protected] | 5.9 | 62.91% | 2021-03-25 | 2026-06-17 |
| CVE-2019-17091 | faces/context/PartialViewContextImpl.java in Eclipse Mojarra, as used in Mojarra for Eclipse EE4J before 2.3.10 and Mojarra JavaServer Faces before 2.2.20, allows Reflected XSS because a client window field is mishandled. | [email protected] | 6.1 | 2.47% | 2019-10-02 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2019-10092 | In Apache HTTP Server 2.4.0-2.4.39, a limited cross-site scripting issue was reported affecting the mod_proxy error page. An attacker could cause the link on the error page to be malformed and instead point to a page of their choice. This would only be exploitable where a server was set up with proxying enabled but was misconfigured in such a way that the Proxy Error page was displayed. | [email protected] | 6.1 | 81.47% | 2019-09-26 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2019-0227 | A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability affected the Apache Axis 1.4 distribution that was last released in 2006. Security and bug commits commits continue in the projects Axis 1.x Subversion repository, legacy users are encouraged to build from source. The successor to Axis 1.x is Axis2, the latest version is 1.7.9 and is not vulnerable to this issue. | [email protected] | 7.5 | 86.50% | 2019-05-01 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2019-1559 | If an application encounters a fatal protocol error and then calls SSL_shutdown() twice (once to send a close_notify, and once to receive one) then OpenSSL can respond differently to the calling application if a 0 byte record is received with invalid padding compared to if a 0 byte record is received with an invalid MAC. If the application then behaves differently based on that in a way that is detectable to the remote peer, then this amounts to a padding oracle that could be used to decrypt dat | [email protected] | 5.9 | 17.14% | 2019-02-27 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2019-3823 | libcurl versions from 7.34.0 to before 7.64.0 are vulnerable to a heap out-of-bounds read in the code handling the end-of-response for SMTP. If the buffer passed to `smtp_endofresp()` isn't NUL terminated and contains no character ending the parsed number, and `len` is set to 5, then the `strtol()` call reads beyond the allocated buffer. The read contents will not be returned to the caller. | [email protected] | 4.3 | 4.29% | 2019-02-06 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2019-3822 | libcurl versions from 7.36.0 to before 7.64.0 are vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow. The function creating an outgoing NTLM type-3 header (`lib/vauth/ntlm.c:Curl_auth_create_ntlm_type3_message()`), generates the request HTTP header contents based on previously received data. The check that exists to prevent the local buffer from getting overflowed is implemented wrongly (using unsigned math) and as such it does not prevent the overflow from happening. This output data can grow larger t | [email protected] | 9.8 | 12.77% | 2019-02-06 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2018-16890 | libcurl versions from 7.36.0 to before 7.64.0 is vulnerable to a heap buffer out-of-bounds read. The function handling incoming NTLM type-2 messages (`lib/vauth/ntlm.c:ntlm_decode_type2_target`) does not validate incoming data correctly and is subject to an integer overflow vulnerability. Using that overflow, a malicious or broken NTLM server could trick libcurl to accept a bad length + offset combination that would lead to a buffer read out-of-bounds. | [email protected] | 7.5 | 5.35% | 2019-02-06 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2018-19439 | XSS exists in the Administration Console in Oracle Secure Global Desktop 4.4 20080807152602 (but was fixed in later versions including 5.4). helpwindow.jsp has reflected XSS via all parameters, as demonstrated by the sgdadmin/faces/com_sun_web_ui/help/helpwindow.jsp windowTitle parameter. | [email protected] | 6.1 | 20.54% | 2018-12-13 | 2026-06-16 |
| CVE-2018-0735 | The OpenSSL ECDSA signature algorithm has been shown to be vulnerable to a timing side channel attack. An attacker could use variations in the signing algorithm to recover the private key. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.0j (Affected 1.1.0-1.1.0i). Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1a (Affected 1.1.1). | [email protected] | 5.9 | 4.76% | 2018-10-29 | 2026-06-16 |