ws_project ws CVE Vulnerabilities (4)

CVEs: 4 CPE versions: View versions table

Summary

This page lists publicly disclosed CVE vulnerabilities affecting ws_project ws (linked via NVD CPE). Each row includes severity scores, summaries, and publication dates to help identify and analyze security issues.

Showing 14 of 4 CVEs
«« First « Prev Page 1 / 1 Next »
CVE Summary Source Max CVSS EPSS % Published Updated
CVE-2026-45736 ws is an open source WebSocket client and server for Node.js. Prior to 8.20.1, the websocket.close() implementation is vulnerable to uninitialized memory disclosure when a TypedArray is passed as the reason argument. This vulnerability is fixed in 8.20.1. [email protected] 4.4 0.01% 2026-05-15 2026-05-19
CVE-2021-32640 ws is an open source WebSocket client and server library for Node.js. A specially crafted value of the `Sec-Websocket-Protocol` header can be used to significantly slow down a ws server. The vulnerability has been fixed in [email protected] (https://github.com/websockets/ws/commit/00c425ec77993773d823f018f64a5c44e17023ff). In vulnerable versions of ws, the issue can be mitigated by reducing the maximum allowed length of the request headers using the [`--max-http-header-size=size`](https://nodejs.org/api/ [email protected] 5.3 1.15% 2021-05-25 2024-11-21
CVE-2016-10542 ws is a "simple to use, blazing fast and thoroughly tested websocket client, server and console for node.js, up-to-date against RFC-6455". By sending an overly long websocket payload to a `ws` server, it is possible to crash the node process. This affects ws 1.1.0 and earlier. [email protected] 7.5 66.07% 2018-05-31 2024-11-21
CVE-2016-10518 A vulnerability was found in the ping functionality of the ws module before 1.0.0 which allowed clients to allocate memory by sending a ping frame. The ping functionality by default responds with a pong frame and the previously given payload of the ping frame. This is exactly what you expect, but internally ws always transforms all data that we need to send to a Buffer instance and that is where the vulnerability existed. ws didn't do any checks for the type of data it was sending. With buffers [email protected] 7.5 0.34% 2018-05-31 2024-11-21
«« First « Prev Page 1 / 1 Next »
cvelogic Threat Intelligence