Aggregates CVE and security vulnerability intelligence across all cockpit-project-related products, including CVSS, EPSS, publication dates, and vulnerability intelligence data.
Historical issues mainly involve vendor risk ssrf and vendor risk denial of service and related problems; some flaws may lead to vendor impact application crash, affecting vendor surface software deployment scenarios.
| CVE | Summary | Source | Max CVSS | EPSS % | Published | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2021-3698 | A flaw was found in Cockpit in versions prior to 260 in the way it handles the certificate verification performed by the System Security Services Daemon (SSSD). This flaw allows client certificates to authenticate successfully, regardless of the Certificate Revocation List (CRL) configuration or the certificate status. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to confidentiality. | [email protected] | 7.5 | 0.14% | 2022-03-10 | 2024-11-21 |
| CVE-2021-3660 | Cockpit (and its plugins) do not seem to protect itself against clickjacking. It is possible to render a page from a cockpit server via another website, inside an <iFrame> HTML entry. This may be used by a malicious website in clickjacking or similar attacks. | [email protected] | 4.3 | 0.26% | 2022-03-10 | 2024-11-21 |
| CVE-2020-35850 | An SSRF issue was discovered in cockpit-project.org Cockpit 234. NOTE: this is unrelated to the Agentejo Cockpit product. NOTE: the vendor states "I don't think [it] is a big real-life issue. | [email protected] | 6.5 | 0.45% | 2020-12-30 | 2024-11-21 |
| CVE-2019-3804 | It was found that cockpit before version 184 used glib's base64 decode functionality incorrectly resulting in a denial of service attack. An unauthenticated attacker could send a specially crafted request with an invalid base64-encoded cookie which could cause the web service to crash. | [email protected] | 7.5 | 4.31% | 2019-03-26 | 2024-11-21 |