Aggregating NVD, CVE, and multi-source threat feeds, this list provides deep analysis of high-risk threats such as RCE. By integrating CVSS and EPSS models, the system dynamically tracks Exp (Exploit) resources and PoC availability to accurately assess Exploitability. Combined with official Patches and remediation strategies, it helps prioritize Vulnerability Management workflows, significantly shortening response cycles and securing your critical assets.
| CVE | Description | Max CVSS | EPSS % | Published | Updated |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2002-20002 | The Net::EasyTCP package before 0.15 for Perl always uses Perl's builtin rand(), which is not a strong random number generator, for cryptographic keys. | 5.4 | 0.29% | 2025-01-02 | 2026-04-15 |
| CVE-2002-20001 | The Diffie-Hellman Key Agreement Protocol allows remote attackers (from the client side) to send arbitrary numbers that are actually not public keys, and trigger expensive server-side DHE modular-exponentiation calculations, aka a D(HE)at or D(HE)ater attack. The client needs very little CPU resources and network bandwidth. The attack may be more disruptive in cases where a client can require a server to select its largest supported key size. The basic attack scenario is that the client must cla | 7.5 | 23.06% | 2021-11-11 | 2025-08-22 |
| CVE-2002-2438 | TCP firewalls could be circumvented by sending a SYN Packets with other flags (like e.g. RST flag) set, which was not correctly discarded by the Linux TCP stack after firewalling. | 7.5 | 3.74% | 2021-05-18 | 2024-11-20 |
| CVE-2002-2442 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | N/A | 0.24% | 2020-11-05 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2002-2441 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | N/A | 0.24% | 2020-11-05 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2002-2440 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: This candidate was withdrawn by its CNA. Notes: none | N/A | 0.24% | 2020-11-05 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2002-2444 | Snoopy before 2.0.0 has a security hole in exec cURL | 9.8 | 1.61% | 2019-10-28 | 2024-11-20 |
| CVE-2002-2439 | Integer overflow in the new[] operator in gcc before 4.8.0 allows attackers to have unspecified impacts. | 7.8 | 0.55% | 2019-10-23 | 2024-11-20 |
| CVE-2002-0390 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: CVE-2002-0639. Reason: This candidate is a reservation duplicate of CVE-2002-0639. Notes: All CVE users should reference CVE-2002-0639 instead of this candidate. All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage | N/A | 0.24% | 2019-07-21 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2002-1305 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2002. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2002-1304 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2002. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2002-1303 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2002. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2002-1302 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2002. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2002-1301 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2002. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2002-1300 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2002. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2002-1299 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2002. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2002-1298 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2002. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2002-1297 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2002. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2002-0635 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2002. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |
| CVE-2002-0634 | Rejected reason: DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2002. Notes: none | N/A | 0.27% | 2017-05-11 | 2023-11-07 |